• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国黑人女性巴氏试验使用中的社会经济不平等:一种交叉性方法。

Socioeconomic Inequities in Pap Test Use Among Black Women in the United States: An Intersectional Approach.

作者信息

Fisher Sydney, Agénor Madina

机构信息

Undergraduate Public Health Program, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.

Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.

出版信息

J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02148-0.

DOI:10.1007/s40615-024-02148-0
PMID:39207671
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Research investigating racialized inequities in cervical cancer screening has rarely considered the influence of socioeconomic position (SEP), a key social determinant of health that intersects with race/ethnicity and racism. Thus, data on socioeconomic inequities in Pap test use within racialized groups-including Black women, who are at elevated risk of cervical cancer morbidity and mortality-are limited.

METHODS

Using 2011-2019 data from the National Survey of Family Growth and guided by an intersectional framework, we used multivariable logistic regression to examine the association between educational attainment, employment status, and income and the adjusted odds of Pap test use in the last 3 years among Black U.S. women.

RESULTS

Compared to Black women with a bachelor's degree or greater, those with less than a high school diploma ([odds ratio] = 0.45; [95% confidence interval] 0.31-0.67) and a high school diploma/GED (0.57; 0.40-0.81) had significantly lower odds of Pap test use, adjusting for sociodemographic factors. Unemployed women had significantly lower adjusted odds of Pap test use compared to employed women (0.67; 0.50-0.89), and women living below 100% of the federal poverty level (FPL) had significantly lower adjusted odds of Pap test use relative to those living at or above 300% FPL (0.63; 0.45-0.88).

CONCLUSION

Low-SEP Black women had significantly lower adjusted odds of Pap test use relative to their higher SEP counterparts. Interventions that address both racism and economic barriers to care are needed to facilitate access to regular cervical cancer screening among low-SEP Black women.

摘要

引言

研究宫颈癌筛查中种族化不平等现象的研究很少考虑社会经济地位(SEP)的影响,社会经济地位是与种族/民族和种族主义相互交织的健康关键社会决定因素。因此,关于种族化群体(包括患宫颈癌发病和死亡风险较高的黑人女性)巴氏试验使用情况的社会经济不平等数据有限。

方法

利用2011 - 2019年全国家庭成长调查数据,并在交叉性框架的指导下,我们使用多变量逻辑回归来研究教育程度、就业状况和收入与美国黑人女性过去3年巴氏试验使用调整后几率之间的关联。

结果

与拥有学士学位或更高学历的黑人女性相比,高中文凭以下(优势比=0.45;95%置信区间0.31 - 0.67)和高中文凭/普通同等学历证书(0.57;0.40 - 0.81)的女性巴氏试验使用几率显著较低,对社会人口学因素进行了调整。与就业女性相比,失业女性巴氏试验使用调整后几率显著较低(0.67;0.50 - 0.89),生活在联邦贫困线(FPL)100%以下的女性相对于生活在FPL 300%及以上的女性巴氏试验使用调整后几率显著较低(0.63;0.45 - 0.88)。

结论

与社会经济地位较高的黑人女性相比,社会经济地位较低的黑人女性巴氏试验使用调整后几率显著较低。需要采取干预措施来解决种族主义和医疗保健的经济障碍,以促进社会经济地位较低的黑人女性能够定期进行宫颈癌筛查。

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic Inequities in Pap Test Use Among Black Women in the United States: An Intersectional Approach.美国黑人女性巴氏试验使用中的社会经济不平等:一种交叉性方法。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s40615-024-02148-0.
2
At the intersection of sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, and cervical cancer screening: assessing Pap test use disparities by sex of sexual partners among black, Latina, and white U.S. women.在性取向、种族/族裔与宫颈癌筛查的交叉点:评估美国黑人、拉丁裔和白人女性中性伴侣性别导致的巴氏试验使用差异。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Sep;116:110-8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.06.039. Epub 2014 Jun 26.
3
Racial and geographic variation in effects of maternal education and neighborhood-level measures of socioeconomic status on gestational age at birth: Findings from the ECHO cohorts.母亲受教育程度和邻里社会经济地位衡量指标对出生时胎龄的影响在种族和地域上的差异:ECHO 队列的研究结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 8;16(1):e0245064. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245064. eCollection 2021.
4
Racial and ethnic disparities in cervical and breast cancer screenings by nativity and length of U.S. residence.按出生地和在美国居住时间划分的宫颈癌和乳腺癌筛查中的种族和民族差异。
Ethn Health. 2023 Aug;28(6):895-911. doi: 10.1080/13557858.2023.2174254. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
5
Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Initiation Among Sexual Orientation Identity and Racial/Ethnic Subgroups of Black and White U.S. Women and Girls: An Intersectional Analysis.美国黑人和白人女性和女孩的性取向认同和种族/民族亚群中人类乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的启动:交叉分析。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2018 Nov;27(11):1349-1358. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2017.6768. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
6
Assessing Intersectional Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening by Disability Status, Race, and Ethnicity.按残疾状况、种族和族裔评估宫颈癌筛查中的交叉差异。
AJPM Focus. 2022 Aug 5;1(2):100019. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100019. eCollection 2022 Dec.
7
Persistent Disparities in Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake: Knowledge and Sociodemographic Determinants of Papanicolaou and Human Papillomavirus Testing Among Women in the United States.持续性的宫颈癌筛查参与率差距:美国女性巴氏涂片检查和人乳头瘤病毒检测的知识与社会人口学决定因素。
Public Health Rep. 2020 Jul/Aug;135(4):483-491. doi: 10.1177/0033354920925094. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
8
Differences in cervical cancer screening and follow-up for black and white women in the United States.美国黑人和白人女性在宫颈癌筛查和随访方面的差异。
Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Feb;160(2):369-374. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.11.027. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
9
Intersectional nativity and racial/ethnic disparities in human papillomavirus vaccination initiation among U.S. women: a national population-based study.美国女性人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种起始率中的交叉出生地与种族/民族差异:一项基于全国人口的研究
Cancer Causes Control. 2018 Oct;29(10):927-936. doi: 10.1007/s10552-018-1069-1. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
10
Individual-, neighborhood-, and state-level socioeconomic predictors of cervical carcinoma screening among U.S. black women: a multilevel analysis.美国黑人女性宫颈癌筛查的个体、邻里和州层面社会经济预测因素:一项多层次分析。
Cancer. 2006 Feb 1;106(3):664-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21660.

本文引用的文献

1
Recent trends in cervical cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, and mortality according to county-level income in the United States, 2000-2019.美国 2000-2019 年按县收入水平划分的宫颈癌发病率、诊断时分期和死亡率的近期趋势。
Int J Cancer. 2024 May 1;154(9):1549-1555. doi: 10.1002/ijc.34860. Epub 2024 Jan 25.
2
Sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes, and knowledge associated with previous screening for cervical cancer among women in western Jamaica.牙买加西部女性的社会人口学特征、态度以及与既往宫颈癌筛查相关的知识。
Infect Agent Cancer. 2023 Sep 23;18(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13027-023-00537-4.
3
Quality communication can improve patient-centred health outcomes among older patients: a rapid review.
高质量的沟通可以改善老年患者以患者为中心的健康结局:快速综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Aug 22;23(1):886. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09869-8.
4
Experiences and Challenges of African American and Sub-Saharan African Immigrant Black Women in Completing Pap Screening: a Mixed Methods Study.非裔美国人和撒哈拉以南非洲移民黑人女性完成巴氏涂片筛查的经验和挑战:一项混合方法研究。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024 Jun;11(3):1405-1417. doi: 10.1007/s40615-023-01617-2. Epub 2023 May 2.
5
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cervical Cancer Incidence, Survival, and Mortality by Histologic Subtype.按组织学亚型划分的宫颈癌发病率、生存率和死亡率的种族和民族差异。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 10;41(5):1059-1068. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01424. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
6
Increased disparities associated with black women and abnormal cervical cancer screening follow-up.黑人女性与异常宫颈癌筛查随访相关的差异增加。
Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2022 Jul 16;42:101041. doi: 10.1016/j.gore.2022.101041. eCollection 2022 Aug.
7
Explaining Correlates of Cervical Cancer Screening among Minority Women in the United States.美国少数族裔女性宫颈癌筛查相关因素解析
Pharmacy (Basel). 2022 Feb 15;10(1):30. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy10010030.
8
Racism Runs Through It: Examining The Sexual And Reproductive Health Experience Of Black Women In The South.种族主义贯穿始终:审视南方黑人女性的性与生殖健康体验。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Feb;41(2):195-202. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01422.
9
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
10
Persistent racial disparities in cervical cancer screening with Pap test.巴氏试验宫颈癌筛查中持续存在的种族差异。
Prev Med Rep. 2021 Nov 27;24:101652. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101652. eCollection 2021 Dec.