Suppr超能文献

短信作为乳腺癌筛查替代邀请方式的应用:一项随机对照试验(M-TICS 研究)。

The use of text messages as an alternative invitation method for breast cancer screening: A randomized controlled trial (M-TICS study).

机构信息

Cancer Screening Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

Early Detection of Cancer Research Group, EPIBELL Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Aug 29;19(8):e0306720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306720. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine whether a text message is as good as a postal letter as an invitation method for previous screenees in a breast cancer screening program, considering a non-inferiority margin of -2 percent points on participation rate. A non-inferiority randomized control trial was conducted. Women in the intervention group (n = 5,362) were invited by text message, and women in the control group (n = 5,482) were invited by letter, which is the standard invitation procedure of the program. In both groups, the invitation included a fixed appointment for mammography and a text message reminder 96 hours before the appointment. The primary outcome was screening participation rate (completing mammography within 12 weeks of invitation). Secondary outcomes included mammography attendance to initial or rescheduled appointments and cancellation rate. The intention-to-treat analysis showed a participation rate of 87.3% and 86.6% in the control and intervention groups, respectively. The difference in participation rate was -0.7 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.8 to ∞), indicating non-inferiority of text messages compared to letter invitations. The per-protocol analysis showed similar results. Attendance at the initial appointment was higher in women who received the text message invitation compared to those in the control group (P<0.002). Women who received the invitation by letter canceled more the initial appointment scheduled compared to the text message group (21.1% and 15.1%, P<0.007). In conclusion, we found that a text message invitation for women who had previously participated in breast cancer screening was not inferior to the standard letter. This randomized controlled trial provides valuable insights into the use of alternative invitation methods for population-based cancer screening programs. However, further research is needed to determine the best timing and frequency of text messages for better outcomes and identify strategies for facilitating rescheduling or cancellation. Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04343950, (04/09/2020).

摘要

本研究旨在确定在乳腺癌筛查计划中,短信邀请与标准信件邀请(非劣效性边界为 2 个百分点)相比,对于之前参加过筛查的女性来说,哪种方法更能提高参与率。为此,我们进行了一项非劣效性随机对照试验。干预组(n=5362)的女性通过短信邀请,对照组(n=5482)的女性通过信件邀请,这是该项目的标准邀请程序。在两组中,邀请都包括固定的乳房 X 光检查预约和 96 小时前的预约短信提醒。主要结局是筛查参与率(在邀请后 12 周内完成乳房 X 光检查)。次要结局包括首次或重新安排的预约时的乳房 X 光检查出席率和取消率。意向治疗分析显示,对照组和干预组的参与率分别为 87.3%和 86.6%。参与率的差异为-0.7 个百分点(95%置信区间[CI],-1.8 至 ∞),表明短信邀请与信件邀请相比具有非劣效性。按方案分析也得到了类似的结果。与对照组相比,收到短信邀请的女性更有可能出席首次预约(P<0.002)。与短信组相比,收到信件邀请的女性取消初始预约的比例更高(21.1%和 15.1%,P<0.007)。综上所述,我们发现,对于之前参加过乳腺癌筛查的女性,短信邀请并不劣于标准信件邀请。这项随机对照试验为基于人群的癌症筛查计划中替代邀请方法的使用提供了有价值的见解。然而,需要进一步研究以确定短信的最佳发送时间和频率,以获得更好的结果,并确定促进重新安排或取消预约的策略。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04343950,(2020 年 4 月 9 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2fb0/11361687/c990f0485c29/pone.0306720.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验