Suppr超能文献

NANO-LM:软脑膜转移患者临床评估的更新记分卡

NANO-LM: An updated scorecard for the clinical assessment of patients with leptomeningeal metastases.

作者信息

Le Rhun Emilie, Nayak Lakshmi, Lim-Fat Mary Jane, Rudà Roberta, Pentsova Elena, Forsyth Peter, O'Brien Barbara J, Preusser Matthias, Kumthekar Priya, Brandsma Dieta, Weller Michael

机构信息

Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Clinical Neuroscience Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

Neuro Oncol. 2025 Feb 10;27(2):455-465. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noae171.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are no validated tools for the clinical neurological assessment of patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM). However, clinical examination during the course of the disease guides medical management and is part of response assessment in clinical trials. Because neuroimaging may not always be obtained owing to rapid clinical deterioration, clinical neurological assessment of LM is essential, and standardization is important to minimize rater disagreement.

METHODS

The Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology-LM group launched a 2-step process, aiming at improving and standardizing the clinical assessment of patients with LM. We report here on the first step the establishment of a consensus scorecard. The task force had 9 virtual meetings to define general recommendations on neurological assessment and selected domains of interest that should be tested.

RESULTS

Fourteen domains of neurological symptoms and signs were selected: level of consciousness, cognition, nausea and vomiting, vision, eye movement, facial strength, hearing, swallowing, speech, limb strength, limb ataxia, walking, and bladder bowel functions. For each item, a clear instruction on how to perform the assessment is provided with scoring criteria between 0 and 2. The general clinical status of the patient and use of steroids, pain medications, and antiemetics should be documented. Neurological sequelae from previous brain metastases or cancer treatment should be rated at the baseline evaluation; it should be specified when symptoms or signs may be related to a condition other than LM.

DISCUSSION

A revised Neurological Assessment in Neuro-Oncology-LM consensus scorecard for clinical assessment has been established. An international prospective validation study of the proposal is currently ongoing (NCT06417710).

摘要

背景

目前尚无经过验证的工具可用于软脑膜转移(LM)患者的临床神经学评估。然而,疾病过程中的临床检查指导医疗管理,并且是临床试验中疗效评估的一部分。由于临床病情迅速恶化可能无法总是进行神经影像学检查,因此LM的临床神经学评估至关重要,标准化对于尽量减少评估者之间的分歧很重要。

方法

神经肿瘤学-LM疗效评估组启动了一个两步流程,旨在改善和标准化LM患者的临床评估。我们在此报告第一步,即建立一个共识记分卡。特别工作组举行了9次虚拟会议,以确定神经学评估的一般建议,并选定应测试的感兴趣领域。

结果

选定了14个神经症状和体征领域:意识水平、认知、恶心和呕吐、视力、眼球运动、面部肌力、听力、吞咽、言语、肢体肌力、肢体共济失调、行走以及膀胱和肠道功能。对于每个项目,都提供了关于如何进行评估的明确说明,评分标准为0至2分。应记录患者的一般临床状况以及类固醇、止痛药物和止吐药的使用情况。既往脑转移或癌症治疗引起的神经后遗症应在基线评估时进行评分;应明确说明症状或体征何时可能与LM以外的疾病有关。

讨论

已建立了一份经修订的用于临床评估的神经肿瘤学-LM神经学评估共识记分卡。目前正在对该提议进行一项国际前瞻性验证研究(NCT06417710)。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验