Suppr超能文献

微型钢板与无头螺钉用于固定桡骨头移位骨折的随机对照试验

Miniplates vs. headless screws for fixation of displaced radial head fractures: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Afifi Ahmed, Othman Mustafa, Moharram Ashraf N, Abdel-Ati Emad A

机构信息

Hand, Upper Limb, and Microsurgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Hand, Upper Limb, and Microsurgery Unit, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Jan;34(1):10-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.07.016. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fixation of displaced radial head fractures using miniplates is technically challenging and has some drawbacks like hardware prominence and limitation of forearm rotation. Fixation by headless compression screws has emerged as a less invasive alternative to miniplates. This study compares the radiological and functional outcomes of both methods of fixation.

METHODS

This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at an academic level 1 trauma center. Sixty patients with displaced isolated radial head fractures were randomized to treatment using either headless compression screws or miniplates in 2 parallel groups. At the final follow-up of 18 months, patients were evaluated radiologically for union and clinically using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), elbow range of motion, grip strength, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and the Disabilities of the Shoulder, Arm, and Hand (DASH) score.

RESULTS

Union was achieved after 8 ± 1.7 weeks in the screw group and after 8.5 ± 2.7 weeks in the plate group. The MEPS was significantly better in the screw group (87.7 ± 10.7) than in the plate group (80.5 ± 13.9). However, this difference is below the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for the MEPS and as such may not be clinically meaningful. No significant differences were observed between both groups regarding flexion, extension ranges, VAS, grip strength, or the DASH score. However, supination and pronation were significantly better in the screw group. The rate of complications was higher in the plate group (26.7%) than in the screw group (3.3%).

CONCLUSION

Both techniques yielded comparable outcomes with better forearm rotation, a lower complication rate, and a lower hardware removal rate in the screw group.

摘要

背景

使用微型钢板固定移位的桡骨头骨折在技术上具有挑战性,并且存在一些缺点,如硬件突出和前臂旋转受限。无头加压螺钉固定已成为微型钢板的一种侵入性较小的替代方法。本研究比较了两种固定方法的放射学和功能结果。

方法

这项单中心、前瞻性、随机对照试验在一级学术创伤中心进行。60例孤立性移位桡骨头骨折患者被随机分为两组,分别使用无头加压螺钉或微型钢板进行治疗。在18个月的最终随访中,对患者进行放射学评估以确定骨折愈合情况,并使用梅奥肘关节功能评分(MEPS)、肘关节活动范围、握力、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)以及肩、臂和手功能障碍(DASH)评分进行临床评估。

结果

螺钉组在8±1.7周后实现骨折愈合,钢板组在8.5±2.7周后实现骨折愈合。螺钉组的MEPS(87.7±10.7)明显优于钢板组(80.5±13.9)。然而,这种差异低于MEPS的最小临床重要差异(MCID),因此可能没有临床意义。两组在屈曲、伸展范围、VAS、握力或DASH评分方面未观察到显著差异。然而,螺钉组的旋前和旋后功能明显更好。钢板组的并发症发生率(26.7%)高于螺钉组(3.3%)。

结论

两种技术均产生了可比的结果,螺钉组的前臂旋转功能更好,并发症发生率更低,硬件取出率更低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验