Freedman Alexa A, Cersonsky Tess E K, Pinar Halit, Goldenberg Robert L, Silver Robert M, Ernst Linda M
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois.
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Am J Perinatol. 2025 Mar;42(4):462-470. doi: 10.1055/a-2405-1621. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
Adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm birth and preeclampsia, are associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes for offspring. Examination of the placenta is important for understanding how the prenatal period shapes long-term cardiovascular health. We sought to investigate the association between placental vascular malperfusion and fetal cardiac structure.
Data obtained from the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network included stillbirths with placental pathology and autopsy. Stillbirths were classified in two ways: based on the severity of placental maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM) and based on the cause of death (MVM, fetal vascular malperfusion [FVM], or acute infection/controls). Organ weight and heart measures were standardized by gestational age (GA) and compared across groups.
We included 329 stillbirths in the analysis by MVM severity and 76 in the analysis by cause of death (COD). While -scores for most organ weights/heart measures were smaller when COD was attributed to MVM as compared with FVM or controls, heart weight and brain weight -scores did not differ by COD ( > 0.05). In analyses accounting for body size, the difference between heart and body weight z-score was -0.05 (standard deviation [SD]: 0.53) among those with MVM as a COD and -0.20 (SD: 0.95) among those with severe MVM. Right and left ventricle thicknesses and tricuspid, pulmonary, mitral, and aortic valve circumferences were consistently as expected or larger than expected for GA and body weight. In the analysis investigating the severity of MVM, those with the most severe MVM had heart measures that were as expected or larger than expected for body weight while those with only mild to moderate MVM had heart measures that were generally small relative to body weight.
When assessed as COD or based on severity, MVM was associated with heart measures that were as expected or larger than expected for GA and body weight, indicating possible heart sparing.
· Fetal deaths with MVM show smaller organ weights.. · Heart weight sparing is seen with fetal death attributed to MVM.. · Heart weight sparing is more pronounced with severe MVM..
不良妊娠结局,包括早产和子痫前期,与后代更差的心血管结局相关。检查胎盘对于理解孕期如何塑造长期心血管健康很重要。我们试图研究胎盘血管灌注不良与胎儿心脏结构之间的关联。
从死产协作研究网络获得的数据包括有胎盘病理学检查和尸检的死产病例。死产病例按两种方式分类:基于胎盘母体血管灌注不良(MVM)的严重程度,以及基于死亡原因(MVM、胎儿血管灌注不良[FVM]或急性感染/对照组)。器官重量和心脏测量值按胎龄(GA)进行标准化,并在各群组间进行比较。
我们纳入了329例按MVM严重程度分析的死产病例以及76例按死亡原因(COD)分析的病例。与FVM或对照组相比,当COD归因于MVM时,大多数器官重量/心脏测量值的z分数较小,但心脏重量和脑重量的z分数在不同COD之间没有差异(P>0.05)。在考虑体型的分析中,以MVM作为COD的病例中,心脏与体重的z分数差值为-0.05(标准差[SD]:0.53),而严重MVM病例中该差值为-0.20(SD:0.95)。右心室和左心室厚度以及三尖瓣、肺动脉瓣、二尖瓣和主动脉瓣周长始终符合预期或大于根据GA和体重预期的值。在研究MVM严重程度的分析中,MVM最严重的病例其心脏测量值符合或大于根据体重预期的值,而仅有轻度至中度MVM的病例其心脏测量值相对于体重通常较小。
当按COD评估或基于严重程度评估时,MVM与符合或大于根据GA和体重预期的心脏测量值相关,表明可能存在心脏保护。
· 因MVM导致的胎儿死亡显示器官重量较小。· 因MVM导致的胎儿死亡可见心脏重量保护。· 严重MVM时心脏重量保护更明显。