Suppr超能文献

青少年健康与促进(HAPPY)混合有效性-实施集群随机试验:比较两种策略在丹麦青少年手球中实施损伤预防运动方案。

Health And Performance Promotion in Youth (HAPPY) hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomised trial: comparison of two strategies to implement an injury prevention exercise programme in Danish youth handball.

机构信息

The Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, Research Unit of Musculoskeletal Function and Physiotherapy, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark

Department of Sports Medicine, Oslo Sports Trauma Research Center, Norwegian School of Sport Sciences, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Br J Sports Med. 2024 Oct 22;58(20):1205-1214. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107880.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if a combination of an online and onsite implementation strategy was superior to an online-only strategy in enhancing the use of an injury prevention exercise programme (IPEP) and in reducing the risk of shoulder, knee and ankle injuries in youth community handball players (age 11-17) over a handball season.

METHODS

In this 30-week hybrid effectiveness-implementation cluster randomised type 3 study, 20 youth handball clubs were randomly assigned 1:1 to either a combined online and onsite implementation strategy (coach workshop using the health action process approach behaviour change model and health service provider (HSP) support) or an online-only strategy (control group). The primary implementation outcome was coach-reported adherence, measured as the average IPEP exercise usage by the team over 30 weeks. The primary effectiveness outcome was player-reported handball playing time to any new handball-related shoulder, knee and ankle injuries, reported weekly using the Oslo Sports Trauma Research Centre Questionnaire on Health Problems.

RESULTS

We enrolled 63 coaches (27% women) and 945 players (mean age 14.5 years, 55% girls). Intention-to-treat analyses showed no statistically significant difference between implementation strategies in adherence (between-group difference 1.4, 95% CI -0.5 to 3.4) or in cumulative injury risk (between-group difference 5.5% points, 95% CI -2.2 to 13.1).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that in youth community handball, a combined online and onsite implementation strategy, including a coach workshop and HSP support, was not superior to an online-only strategy regarding adherence to an IPEP or in reducing shoulder, knee and ankle injury risk.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05294237.

摘要

目的

研究在线和现场实施策略的结合是否优于仅在线策略,以提高青少年社区手球运动员(11-17 岁)在一个手球赛季中使用伤害预防运动方案(IPEP)的频率,并降低肩部、膝部和踝部受伤的风险。

方法

在这项 30 周的混合有效性-实施集群随机 3 期研究中,将 20 个青少年手球俱乐部随机分为 1:1 的组合在线和现场实施策略(使用健康行动过程方法行为改变模型的教练研讨会和健康服务提供者(HSP)支持)或仅在线策略(对照组)。主要实施结果是教练报告的依从性,以团队在 30 周内平均使用 IPEP 锻炼的次数来衡量。主要有效性结果是球员报告的手球比赛时间,任何新的与手球相关的肩部、膝部和踝部受伤,每周使用奥斯陆运动创伤研究中心健康问题问卷报告。

结果

我们招募了 63 名教练(27%为女性)和 945 名运动员(平均年龄 14.5 岁,55%为女性)。意向治疗分析显示,实施策略在依从性(组间差异 1.4,95%CI-0.5 至 3.4)或累积损伤风险(组间差异 5.5%点,95%CI-2.2 至 13.1)方面无统计学显著差异。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,在青少年社区手球中,在线和现场相结合的实施策略,包括教练研讨会和 HSP 支持,在依从性方面并不优于仅在线策略,也不能降低肩部、膝部和踝部受伤的风险。

试验注册号

NCT05294237。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验