Dept. of Interventional Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, the Netherlands.
Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Eur J Radiol. 2024 Nov;180:111645. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111645. Epub 2024 Aug 18.
During Interventional Cardiology (IC) and Interventional Radiology (IR) procedures operators' gloves, guide wires and catheters may stick together due to the inherent stickiness of Iodine Containing Contrast Media (ICCM). This may result in displacement of materials, compromising technical success. In this study we compare the stickiness of seven frequently used types of ICCM.
Xenetix 300, Hexabrix 320 (Guerbet, Villepinte, France), Ultravist 300 (Bayer, Leverkusen, Germany), Visipaque 270, Omnipaque 300, Visipaque 320 (GE, Wauwatosa, WI) and Iomeron300 (Bracco, Milano, Italy) are compared using a probe-tack test. Pieces of surgical gloves are put together with 0.1 ml of of ICCM in between, and subsequently pulled apart under computer control. Stickiness is measured as the work needed to separate the probes.
From least to most sticky results were: Hexabrix 320 (mean Work (mJ); range: 0.70; 0.16-1.23), Visipaque 270 (1.18; 0.47-1.89), Visipaque 320 (1.70; 0.59-2.81), Iomeron 300 (3.01; 1.82-4.20), Xenetix 300 (5.83; 3.96-7.69), Ultravist 300 (5.83; 2.83-8.84), Omnipaque 300 (8.14; 6.95-9.33). The four least sticky ICCM differ statistically significantly (p = 0.000-0.004) from the remaining. In this research Omnipaque 300, Ultravist 300 and Xenetix 300 are the stickiest and may hence pose the greatest practical problems during procedures; in contrast, Hexabrix 320, Visipaque 270 and Visipaque 320 are the least sticky in this research and may therefore aid in constraining complications caused by stickiness.
A significant and reproducible difference in stickiness exists between commercially available ICCM, Hexabrix 320, Visipaque 270, Visipaque 320 and Iomeron 300, being least sticky.
在介入心脏病学(IC)和介入放射学(IR)手术中,由于含碘对比剂(ICCM)固有的粘性,操作者的手套、导丝和导管可能会粘在一起。这可能导致材料移位,从而影响技术成功率。在这项研究中,我们比较了七种常用类型的 ICCM 的粘性。
使用探针粘性测试比较 Xenetix 300、Hexabrix 320(Guerbet,Villepinte,法国)、Ultravist 300(Bayer,Leverkusen,德国)、Visipaque 270、Omnipaque 300、Visipaque 320(GE,Wauwatosa,WI)和 Iomeron300(Bracco,Milano,意大利)。将手术手套的碎片放在 0.1ml 的 ICCM 之间,然后在计算机控制下将探针拉开。粘性通过分离探针所需的功来测量。
粘性从低到高依次为:Hexabrix 320(平均功(mJ);范围:0.70;0.16-1.23)、Visipaque 270(1.18;0.47-1.89)、Visipaque 320(1.70;0.59-2.81)、Iomeron 300(3.01;1.82-4.20)、Xenetix 300(5.83;3.96-7.69)、Ultravist 300(5.83;2.83-8.84)、Omnipaque 300(8.14;6.95-9.33)。这四种粘性最低的 ICCM 与其余的 ICCM 在统计学上有显著差异(p=0.000-0.004)。在这项研究中,Omnipaque 300、Ultravist 300 和 Xenetix 300 的粘性最高,因此在手术过程中可能会出现最大的实际问题;相比之下,Hexabrix 320、Visipaque 270 和 Visipaque 320 在这项研究中的粘性最低,因此可能有助于控制由粘性引起的并发症。
商业上可获得的 ICCM、Hexabrix 320、Visipaque 270、Visipaque 320 和 Iomeron 300 之间存在显著且可重复的粘性差异,它们的粘性最低。