• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

清晨和傍晚的使用习惯会增加错误信息的传播。

Early morning hour and evening usage habits increase misinformation-spread.

机构信息

Computational Social Science, Department of Humanities, Social and Political Sciences, ETH Zurich, Zurich, 8092, Switzerland.

Complex Human Behaviour Lab, Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, 38123, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 30;14(1):20233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69447-8.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-69447-8
PMID:39215045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11364767/
Abstract

Social media manipulation poses a significant threat to cognitive autonomy and unbiased opinion formation. Prior literature explored the relationship between online activity and emotional state, cognitive resources, sunlight and weather. However, a limited understanding exists regarding the role of time of day in content spread and the impact of user activity patterns on susceptibility to mis- and disinformation. This work uncovers a strong correlation between user activity time patterns and the tendency to spread potentially disinformative content. Through quantitative analysis of Twitter (now X) data, we examine how user activity throughout the day aligns with diurnal behavioural archetypes. Evening types exhibit a significantly higher inclination towards spreading potentially disinformative content, which is more likely at night-time. This knowledge can become crucial for developing targeted interventions and strategies that mitigate misinformation spread by addressing vulnerable periods and user groups more susceptible to manipulation.

摘要

社交媒体操纵对认知自主性和客观意见的形成构成了重大威胁。现有文献探讨了在线活动与情绪状态、认知资源、阳光和天气之间的关系。然而,对于一天中的时间在内容传播中的作用以及用户活动模式对错误和虚假信息的易感性的影响,我们的了解还很有限。这项工作揭示了用户活动时间模式和传播潜在虚假信息内容的倾向之间的强烈相关性。通过对 Twitter(现为 X)数据的定量分析,我们研究了用户全天的活动如何与昼夜行为原型相吻合。夜猫子型人群表现出传播潜在虚假信息内容的明显更高倾向,这种倾向在夜间更为明显。这一知识对于制定有针对性的干预措施和策略至关重要,这些措施和策略可以通过解决易受操纵的脆弱时期和用户群体来减轻错误信息的传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111c/11364767/c4b6dd5229f0/41598_2024_69447_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111c/11364767/b01b96aa9984/41598_2024_69447_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111c/11364767/efe18baa9dca/41598_2024_69447_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111c/11364767/17bad6f2d1f0/41598_2024_69447_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111c/11364767/c4b6dd5229f0/41598_2024_69447_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111c/11364767/b01b96aa9984/41598_2024_69447_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111c/11364767/efe18baa9dca/41598_2024_69447_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111c/11364767/17bad6f2d1f0/41598_2024_69447_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/111c/11364767/c4b6dd5229f0/41598_2024_69447_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Early morning hour and evening usage habits increase misinformation-spread.清晨和傍晚的使用习惯会增加错误信息的传播。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 30;14(1):20233. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69447-8.
2
Misinformation about spinal manipulation and boosting immunity: an analysis of Twitter activity during the COVID-19 crisis.关于脊柱推拿与增强免疫力的错误信息:对新冠疫情危机期间推特活动的分析
Chiropr Man Therap. 2020 Jun 9;28(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12998-020-00319-4.
3
Bots and Misinformation Spread on Social Media: Implications for COVID-19.社交媒体上的机器人与错误信息传播:对新冠疫情的影响
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 20;23(5):e26933. doi: 10.2196/26933.
4
Mitigating the influence of message features on health misinformation sharing intention in social media: Experimental evidence for accuracy-nudge intervention.减轻社交媒体中信息特征对健康错误信息分享意愿的影响:准确性提示干预的实验证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Sep;356:117136. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117136. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
5
A scoping review of digital health interventions for combating COVID-19 misinformation and disinformation.针对 COVID-19 错误信息和虚假信息的数字健康干预措施的范围综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023 Mar 16;30(4):752-760. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad005.
6
[Mis- and disinformation in social media: mitigating risks in digital health communication].[社交媒体中的错误信息和虚假信息:减轻数字健康传播中的风险]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2024 Mar;67(3):300-307. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03836-2. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
7
Changing the incentive structure of social media platforms to halt the spread of misinformation.改变社交媒体平台的激励结构以阻止错误信息的传播。
Elife. 2023 Jun 6;12:e85767. doi: 10.7554/eLife.85767.
8
The spread of low-credibility content by social bots.社交机器人传播低可信度内容。
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 20;9(1):4787. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7.
9
Medical and Health-Related Misinformation on Social Media: Bibliometric Study of the Scientific Literature.社交媒体上的医疗健康相关错误信息:科学文献的文献计量研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 25;24(1):e28152. doi: 10.2196/28152.
10
A Stanford Conference on Social Media, Ethics, and COVID-19 Misinformation (INFODEMIC): Qualitative Thematic Analysis.斯坦福社交媒体、伦理与 COVID-19 错误信息会议(INFODEMIC):定性主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Feb 15;24(2):e35707. doi: 10.2196/35707.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between circadian rhythm and brain cognitive functions.昼夜节律与大脑认知功能之间的关系。
Front Optoelectron. 2021 Sep;14(3):278-287. doi: 10.1007/s12200-021-1090-y. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
2
Social Media News Use and COVID-19 Misinformation Engagement: Survey Study.社交媒体新闻使用与新冠病毒错误信息接触:调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Sep 20;24(9):e38944. doi: 10.2196/38944.
3
Sleep loss leads to the withdrawal of human helping across individuals, groups, and large-scale societies.睡眠缺失会导致人际间、群体间和大规模社会中的助人行为减少。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Aug 23;20(8):e3001733. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001733. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Editorial: Effects of COVID-19 on sleep and circadian rhythms: Searching for evidence of reciprocal interactions.社论:2019冠状病毒病对睡眠和昼夜节律的影响:寻找相互作用的证据
Front Neurosci. 2022 Aug 5;16:952305. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.952305. eCollection 2022.
5
Misinformation: susceptibility, spread, and interventions to immunize the public.错误信息:易感性、传播以及让公众免疫的干预措施。
Nat Med. 2022 Mar;28(3):460-467. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
6
Reading on a smartphone affects sigh generation, brain activity, and comprehension.在智能手机上阅读会影响叹气的产生、大脑活动及阅读理解。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1589. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-05605-0.
7
Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries.在 26 个国家的阴谋心态和政治倾向。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Mar;6(3):392-403. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
8
A systematic review on fake news research through the lens of news creation and consumption: Research efforts, challenges, and future directions.虚假新闻研究的系统综述:从新闻创作和消费的角度看研究努力、挑战和未来方向。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 9;16(12):e0260080. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260080. eCollection 2021.
9
How social media shapes polarization.社交媒体如何塑造极化现象。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Nov;25(11):913-916. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.07.013. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
10
Twitter, time and emotions.推特、时间与情感。
R Soc Open Sci. 2021 May 26;8(5):201900. doi: 10.1098/rsos.201900.