• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿莫西林对比安慰剂治疗 A 组链球菌性咽炎患儿的症状:一项随机、多中心、双盲、非劣效性试验。

Amoxicillin vs. placebo to reduce symptoms in children with group A streptococcal pharyngitis: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.

机构信息

Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Geneva University Children's Hospital and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Pediatric Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Nov;183(11):4773-4782. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05705-1. Epub 2024 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1007/s00431-024-05705-1
PMID:39215861
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11473506/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The efficacy of antibiotic therapy for group A streptococcus (GAS) pharyngitis is debated. The role of antibiotics in preventing complications seems limited, with the main potential benefit being symptom duration reduction. Our study aimed to evaluate whether a placebo is non-inferior to amoxicillin in reducing fever duration. We randomized 88 children between 3 and 15 years of age presenting with acute symptoms of pharyngitis and a positive rapid antigen detection test for GAS to receive 6-day treatment with either placebo (n = 46) or amoxicillin (n = 42). The primary outcome was the difference in fever duration, with a non-inferiority threshold set at 12 h. The secondary outcomes included pain intensity and complications of streptococcal pharyngitis. The mean difference in fever duration between the amoxicillin and placebo groups was 2.0 h (95% CI, - 8.3 to 12.3) in the per-protocol analysis and 2.8 h (95% CI, - 6.5 to 12.2) in the intention-to-treat analysis. Treatment failure was observed in six participants in the placebo group and two in the amoxicillin group (relative risk, 2.15; 95% CI, 0.44-10.57). All patients were identified early and recovered well. There was no clinically relevant difference in pain intensity between groups over the 7 days following randomization, with the largest difference of 0.5 (95% CI, - 0.62-1.80) observed on day 3.

CONCLUSION

Placebo appears to be non-inferior to amoxicillin in reducing fever duration. Pain intensity and risk of complications were similar between the two groups. These findings support the restrictive antibiotic treatment for streptococcal pharyngitis.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Group A streptococcus pharyngitis is a common reason for prescribing antibiotics in pediatric care. • In high-income countries, while antibiotic treatment has not been effective in preventing non-suppurative complications, the primary justification for their use remains the reduction of symptoms.

WHAT IS NEW

• Our results suggest that antibiotics have a limited impact on the duration of fever and the intensity of pain in children with streptococcal pharyngitis. • Considering that suppurative complications can be promptly treated if they arise, we recommend a more judicious approach to antibiotic prescriptions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) # NCT03264911 on 15.08.2017.

摘要

未加标签

关于 A 组链球菌(GAS)咽炎的抗生素治疗效果存在争议。抗生素预防并发症的作用似乎有限,主要潜在益处是缩短症状持续时间。我们的研究旨在评估安慰剂是否不劣于阿莫西林缩短发热持续时间。我们将 88 名 3-15 岁的急性咽炎患儿和 GAS 快速抗原检测阳性的患儿随机分为接受 6 天安慰剂(n=46)或阿莫西林(n=42)治疗的两组。主要结局是发热持续时间的差异,非劣效性界值设定为 12 小时。次要结局包括疼痛强度和链球菌性咽炎的并发症。在方案分析中,阿莫西林组和安慰剂组的发热持续时间平均差异为 2.0 小时(95%CI,-8.3 至 12.3),意向治疗分析中为 2.8 小时(95%CI,-6.5 至 12.2)。安慰剂组有 6 名参与者和阿莫西林组有 2 名参与者治疗失败(相对风险,2.15;95%CI,0.44-10.57)。所有患者均在早期发现并康复良好。随机分组后 7 天内,两组间疼痛强度无临床相关差异,最大差异为 0.5(95%CI,-0.62-1.80),第 3 天观察到。

结论

安慰剂似乎不劣于阿莫西林缩短发热持续时间。两组间疼痛强度和并发症风险相似。这些发现支持对链球菌性咽炎的限制性抗生素治疗。

已知

• A 组链球菌咽炎是儿科抗生素治疗的常见原因。• 在高收入国家,虽然抗生素治疗不能有效预防非化脓性并发症,但使用抗生素的主要理由仍是减轻症状。

新内容

• 我们的结果表明,抗生素对儿童链球菌性咽炎发热持续时间和疼痛强度的影响有限。• 考虑到化脓性并发症如果出现可以及时治疗,我们建议更谨慎地开具抗生素处方。

试验注册

该试验于 2017 年 8 月 15 日在美国国立卫生研究院(ClinicalTrials.gov)注册#NCT03264911。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965c/11473506/6fd50c4c5533/431_2024_5705_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965c/11473506/8aab5c278101/431_2024_5705_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965c/11473506/4b6395163a76/431_2024_5705_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965c/11473506/f18b1bd2c27e/431_2024_5705_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965c/11473506/6fd50c4c5533/431_2024_5705_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965c/11473506/8aab5c278101/431_2024_5705_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965c/11473506/4b6395163a76/431_2024_5705_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965c/11473506/f18b1bd2c27e/431_2024_5705_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/965c/11473506/6fd50c4c5533/431_2024_5705_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Amoxicillin vs. placebo to reduce symptoms in children with group A streptococcal pharyngitis: a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.阿莫西林对比安慰剂治疗 A 组链球菌性咽炎患儿的症状:一项随机、多中心、双盲、非劣效性试验。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Nov;183(11):4773-4782. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05705-1. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.不同的抗生素治疗方案用于治疗 A 组链球菌性咽炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 17;3(3):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub5.
3
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.不同的抗生素治疗方案用于治疗 A 组链球菌性咽炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 15;11(11):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub6.
4
Treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis with once-daily compared with twice-daily amoxicillin: a noninferiority trial.每日一次与每日两次阿莫西林治疗链球菌性咽炎的非劣效性试验。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2006 Sep;25(9):761-7. doi: 10.1097/01.inf.0000235678.46805.92.
5
Different antibiotic treatments for group A streptococcal pharyngitis.A组链球菌性咽炎的不同抗生素治疗方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30(4):CD004406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004406.pub3.
6
Antibiotics for acute group A streptococcal pharyngitis.用于治疗A组链球菌性急性咽炎的抗生素
Prescrire Int. 2004 Dec;13(74):227-32.
7
Treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis with once-daily amoxicillin versus intramuscular benzathine penicillin G in low-resource settings: a randomized controlled trial.在资源匮乏地区,每日一次阿莫西林与肌内注射苄星青霉素G治疗链球菌性咽炎的随机对照试验。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011 Jun;50(6):535-42. doi: 10.1177/0009922810394838. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
8
Effectiveness of clinical guidelines for the presumptive treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis in Egyptian children.埃及儿童链球菌性咽炎推定治疗临床指南的有效性
Lancet. 1997 Sep 27;350(9082):918-21. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)03317-5.
9
Recommendations for management of acute pharyngitis in adults.成人急性咽炎管理建议。
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2015 May-Jun;66(3):159-70. doi: 10.1016/j.otorri.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
10
Randomized, single-blinded comparative study of the efficacy of amoxicillin (40 mg/kg/day) versus standard-dose penicillin V in the treatment of group A streptococcal pharyngitis in children.阿莫西林(40毫克/千克/天)与标准剂量青霉素V治疗儿童A组链球菌性咽炎疗效的随机单盲对照研究。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1998 Jun;37(6):341-6. doi: 10.1177/000992289803700602.

引用本文的文献

1
Centor scores associated poorly with rapid antigen test findings in children with sore throat.咽痛患儿中,Centor 评分与快速抗原检测结果相关性差。
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Nov 11;184(1):4. doi: 10.1007/s00431-024-05863-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Are Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections Preventable by Antibiotic Therapy?: A Collaborative Retrospective Study.抗生素治疗能否预防侵袭性A组链球菌感染?一项合作回顾性研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2024 Oct 1;43(10):931-935. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000004403. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
2
Epidemiology of group A streptococcal infection: are we ready for a new scenario?A组链球菌感染的流行病学:我们是否已为新情况做好准备?
Lancet Microbe. 2024 Jul;5(7):620-621. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(24)00071-5. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
3
Antibiotic exposure and adverse long-term health outcomes in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
抗生素暴露与儿童不良长期健康结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Infect. 2022 Sep;85(3):213-300. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.01.005. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
4
Burden of Group A Streptococcal Pharyngitis, Rheumatic Fever, and Rheumatic Heart Disease in India: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.印度 A 组链球菌性咽炎、风湿热和风湿性心脏病负担:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Pediatr. 2022 Jul;89(7):642-650. doi: 10.1007/s12098-021-03845-y. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
5
Comparison of Centor and McIsaac scores in primary care: a meta-analysis over multiple thresholds.基层医疗中 Centor 评分与 McIsaac 评分的比较:多个截断值的荟萃分析。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Mar 26;70(693):e245-e254. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X708833. Print 2020 Apr.
6
[Antibiotics to treat streptococcal pharyngitis in Swiss children: is it still useful?].[用于治疗瑞士儿童链球菌性咽炎的抗生素:它仍然有用吗?]
Rev Med Suisse. 2016 Feb 17;12(506):334-7.
7
Peritonsillar Abscess: Complication of Acute Tonsillitis or Weber's Glands Infection?扁桃体周围脓肿:急性扁桃体炎的并发症还是韦贝尔腺感染?
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Aug;155(2):199-207. doi: 10.1177/0194599816639551. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
8
The Group A Streptococcal Carrier State Reviewed: Still an Enigma.A组链球菌携带状态综述:仍是一个谜。
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2014 Dec;3(4):336-42. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piu030. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
9
Invasive Group A Streptococcal Infections in Children: A Nationwide Survey in Finland.儿童侵袭性A组链球菌感染:芬兰全国性调查
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016 Feb;35(2):123-8. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000945.
10
Rapid diagnostic tests for group A streptococcal pharyngitis: a meta-analysis.快速诊断试验在 A 组链球菌性咽炎中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
Pediatrics. 2014 Oct;134(4):771-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1094. Epub 2014 Sep 8.