The Breast Cancer Now Toby Robins Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London.
Breast Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
ESMO Open. 2024 Sep;9(9):103687. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.103687. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
In early breast cancer (EBC) patients, we aimed to determine whether circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis following primary surgery, before systemic therapy, identified molecular residual disease and was associated with risk of relapse and relapse-free survival (RFS).
Plasma was collected, retrospectively, before surgery, 1-14 weeks post-operatively, and before adjuvant therapy, and in a subset of patients after adjuvant therapy. A personalized, tumor-informed, multiplex PCR next generation sequencing assay (Signatera™) was used for ctDNA detection and quantification. The primary objective was to compare RFS and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) in patients with detected versus non-detected ctDNA.
A total of 48 patients with EBC (median age 50.5 years) [34 hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-), 5 HER2+, 9 triple-negative breast cancer) were included. ctDNA was detected in 64.5% (20/31) of patients before surgery, and 35.4% (17/48) after surgery. ctDNA detection before surgery was associated with tumor grade (P = 0.019), ctDNA detection after surgery was associated with receptor subtype (P = 0.01). Patients with ctDNA detected after surgery had worse DRFS [hazard ratio = 5.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-28.5, P = 0.04]. RFS in patients with ctDNA detected after surgery was worse than in those with lack of ctDNA detection, although not statistically significant (hazard ratio = 3.7, 95% CI 0.9-15.7, P = 0.073). Patients with ctDNA detected preoperatively or post-operatively had a trend towards worse RFS (hazard ratio = 7.8, 95% CI 0.9-63.7, P = 0.05) and DRFS (hazard ratio = 6.8, 95% CI 0.8-57, P = 0.07) compared with those with ctDNA undetected at both timepoints. ctDNA detection anticipated clinical relapse with a median lead time of 16 months.
In patients with treatment-naive EBC, ctDNA is detectable after surgery. The absence of ctDNA at a single post-surgical timepoint is associated with improved DRFS, supporting the development of future trials studying de-escalation of systemic therapy.
在早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者中,我们旨在确定在接受系统治疗前的主要手术后,循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)分析是否可以识别分子残留疾病,并与复发风险和无复发生存(RFS)相关。
在手术前、手术后 1-14 周以及辅助治疗前,前瞻性地采集血浆,并在部分患者接受辅助治疗后采集。使用个性化、肿瘤信息、多重 PCR 下一代测序检测(Signatera™)用于 ctDNA 的检测和定量。主要目标是比较检测到 ctDNA 与未检测到 ctDNA 的患者的 RFS 和远处无复发生存(DRFS)。
共纳入 48 例 EBC 患者(中位年龄 50.5 岁)[34 例激素受体阳性/人表皮生长因子受体 2 阴性(HR+/HER2-),5 例 HER2+,9 例三阴性乳腺癌]。在手术前,ctDNA 在 64.5%(20/31)的患者中,手术后在 35.4%(17/48)的患者中检测到 ctDNA。手术后 ctDNA 的检测与肿瘤分级相关(P=0.019),手术后 ctDNA 的检测与受体亚型相关(P=0.01)。手术后检测到 ctDNA 的患者的 DRFS 更差[风险比=5.5,95%置信区间(CI)1.1-28.5,P=0.04]。尽管手术后检测到 ctDNA 的患者的 RFS 并不优于未检测到 ctDNA 的患者,但有统计学意义(风险比=3.7,95%CI 0.9-15.7,P=0.073)。术前或术后检测到 ctDNA 的患者的 RFS 和 DRFS 均有恶化的趋势(风险比=7.8,95%CI 0.9-63.7,P=0.05 和风险比=6.8,95%CI 0.8-57,P=0.07)与在两个时间点均未检测到 ctDNA 的患者相比。ctDNA 的检测预期的临床复发,中位领先时间为 16 个月。
在未经治疗的 EBC 患者中,手术后可以检测到 ctDNA。在单个术后时间点未检测到 ctDNA 与改善的 DRFS 相关,支持未来研究系统治疗降级的研究。