Academic Trials Promoting Team (ATPT), Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles (HUB), Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), Brussels, Belgium.
Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
ESMO Open. 2024 Mar;9(3):102390. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.102390. Epub 2024 Mar 10.
The incorporation of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) into the management of operable breast cancer (BC) has been hampered by the heterogeneous results from different studies. We aimed to assess the prognostic value of ctDNA in patients with operable (non metastatic) BC.
A systematic search of databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL) and conference proceedings was conducted to identify studies reporting the association of ctDNA detection with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with stage I-III BC. Log-hazard ratios (HRs) were pooled at each timepoint of ctDNA assessment (baseline, after neoadjuvant therapy, and follow-up). ctDNA assays were classified as primary tumor-informed and non tumor-informed.
Of the 3174 records identified, 57 studies including 5779 patients were eligible. In univariate analyses, ctDNA detection was associated with worse DFS at baseline [HR 2.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.92-4.63], after neoadjuvant therapy (HR 7.69, 95% CI 4.83-12.24), and during follow-up (HR 14.04, 95% CI 7.55-26.11). Similarly, ctDNA detection at all timepoints was associated with worse OS (at baseline: HR 2.76, 95% CI 1.60-4.77; after neoadjuvant therapy: HR 2.72, 95% CI 1.44-5.14; and during follow-up: HR 9.19, 95% CI 3.26-25.90). Similar DFS and OS results were observed in multivariate analyses. Pooled HRs were numerically higher when ctDNA was detected at the end of neoadjuvant therapy or during follow-up and for primary tumor-informed assays. ctDNA detection sensitivity and specificity for BC recurrence ranged from 0.31 to 1.0 and 0.7 to 1.0, respectively. The mean lead time from ctDNA detection to overt recurrence was 10.81 months (range 0-58.9 months).
ctDNA detection was associated with worse DFS and OS in patients with operable BC, particularly when detected after treatment and using primary tumor-informed assays. ctDNA detection has a high specificity for anticipating BC relapse.
将循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA)纳入可手术乳腺癌(BC)的管理中受到不同研究结果存在差异的阻碍。我们旨在评估 ctDNA 对可手术(非转移性)BC 患者的预后价值。
系统地检索了数据库(PubMed/Medline、Embase 和 CENTRAL)和会议记录,以确定报告 ctDNA 检测与 I-III 期 BC 患者无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)之间关联的研究。在 ctDNA 评估的每个时间点(基线、新辅助治疗后和随访时)汇总对数风险比(HRs)。ctDNA 检测法分为基于原发肿瘤的检测法和非基于肿瘤的检测法。
在确定的 3174 条记录中,有 57 项研究符合纳入 5779 例患者的标准。在单变量分析中,ctDNA 检测与基线时较差的 DFS[HR 2.98,95%置信区间(CI)1.92-4.63]、新辅助治疗后(HR 7.69,95%CI 4.83-12.24)和随访期间(HR 14.04,95%CI 7.55-26.11)较差的 DFS 相关。同样,所有时间点的 ctDNA 检测均与较差的 OS 相关(基线时:HR 2.76,95%CI 1.60-4.77;新辅助治疗后:HR 2.72,95%CI 1.44-5.14;随访时:HR 9.19,95%CI 3.26-25.90)。多变量分析也观察到了类似的 DFS 和 OS 结果。当 ctDNA 在新辅助治疗结束时或随访期间检测到,或使用基于原发肿瘤的检测法时,HR 汇总值的数值更高。ctDNA 检测对 BC 复发的敏感性和特异性范围分别为 0.31 至 1.0 和 0.7 至 1.0。从 ctDNA 检测到明显复发的平均领先时间为 10.81 个月(范围 0-58.9 个月)。
ctDNA 检测与可手术 BC 患者的较差 DFS 和 OS 相关,尤其是在治疗后检测和使用基于原发肿瘤的检测法时。ctDNA 检测对预测 BC 复发具有很高的特异性。