The efficacy and safety of PI3K and AKT inhibitors for patients with cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND

Inhibiting PI3K/AKT pathway activation may hinder the occurrence and progression of cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PI3K/AKT inhibitors and determine the most appropriate inhibitor for different cancer types.

METHODS

Electronic databases up to June 2024 were used to examine the efficacy and safety of PI3K inhibitors (alpelisib, copanlisib, duvelisib, and idelalisib) and AKT inhibitors (capivasertib, ipatasertib and MK-2206) for the treatment of cancer. Data was assessed with a random-effect pairwise and network meta-analysis. Randomized controlled trials and retrospective studies were eligible if they compared PI3K or AKT inhibitors with non-PI3K/AKT controls with no restriction.

RESULTS

The results were based on 34 studies from 34 published articles and 6 online registration trials (6710 patients). According to pairwise meta-analysis, PI3K/AKT inhibitors showed to be highly effective, especially for treating mutant cancers, but had poor safety profiles. According to our network meta-analysis, PI3K/AKT inhibitors, especially the AKT inhibitor capivasertib, are effective for treating solid cancers such as breast cancer (BC). Moreover, PI3K inhibitors, especially idelalisib, were effective for treating hematologic cancers such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL).

CONCLUSIONS

The PI3K/AKT inhibitors are effective in patients with genetic mutations. For solid cancers such as BC, capivasertib was efficacy and safety. For hematological cancers represented by CLL, idelalisib was efficacy and safety. The above studies can be used when recommending appropriate targeted therapies for patients with different cancer types.