Zhou Rui, Cao Yuansheng, Chen Xuemeng, Peng Yanhua, Xiong Chao, Zhai Wenhu, Zhang Xianjie, Zhou Yukai, Xiong Lize
Shanghai Key Laboratory of Anesthesiology and Brain Functional Modulation, Translational Research Institute of Brain and Brain-Like Intelligence, Clinical Research Center for Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Shanghai Fourth People's Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, No. 1279, Sanmen Road, Hongkou District, Shanghai 200434, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Deyang People's Hospital, No. 173, Section 1 of North Taishan North Road, Deyang 618000, China.
Postgrad Med J. 2025 Jan 23;101(1192):116-122. doi: 10.1093/postmj/qgae116.
To compare the speed of achieving painless uterine contractions in parturients undergoing epidural analgesia at different lumbar puncture levels.
This study is a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary A hospital with a history of over 80 years in Sichuan Province, China. Parturients aged 22-40 years old scheduled for vaginal delivery under epidural analgesia were recruited. Eligible patients were randomly allocated into lumbar 2-3 (L2-3) or lumbar 3-4 (L3-4) groups. Epidural analgesia was performed through the interspaces according to grouping. The primary outcome was the percentage of painless uterine contractions 15 min after the initiation of analgesia. The secondary outcomes included the percentage of painless status at 5 and 10 min, sensory block plane, motor block evaluation, adverse events of parturients, epidural analgesic consumption, Apgar score, and the parturients' evaluation of analgesia.
Between April 2023 and August 2023, a total of 150 women were finally recruited, and 136 of them were analyzed (68 in each group). In comparison with the L3-4 groups, there was a significantly larger proportion of painless uterine contractions at 5, 10, and 15 min after analgesia initiation in the L2-3 group (20.6% vs. 7.4%, 52.9% vs. 26.5%, and 80.9% vs. 64.7%, P = .026, .002, and .034, respectively). Similarly, the pain scores were lower in the L2-3 group at 5, 10, and 15 min than that in the L3-4 group (5(4,7) vs. 6(5,7), 3(2,5) vs. 4(3,6), and 2(1,3) vs. 3(2,5), P = .006, .004, and .020, respectively). Furthermore, puncturing through the L2-3 interspace contributed to a higher evaluation of parturients to the analgesia procedure (9(8,9) vs. 8(8,9), P < .001). However, there was no significant difference in sensory block, motor block, or adverse events between the two groups.
Puncturing through the L2-3 interspace is associated with faster pain relief and a better experience for parturients. These findings present a superior option for anesthesiologists when conducting epidural labor analgesia. Key messages What is already known on this topic? Epidural analgesia is an effective way to relieve labor pain. What this study adds? Puncturing via lumbar 2-3 interspace induces more rapid onset of epidural analgesia. How this study might affect research, practice or policy? Lumbar 2-3 interspace is a superior option in terms of the speed of pain relief and satisfaction of parturients when conducting epidural labor analgesia.
比较不同腰椎穿刺水平行硬膜外镇痛的产妇实现无痛子宫收缩的速度。
本研究是在中国四川省一所拥有80多年历史的三级甲等医院进行的一项随机对照试验。招募计划在硬膜外镇痛下行阴道分娩的22至40岁产妇。符合条件的患者被随机分为腰2 - 3(L2 - 3)组或腰3 - 4(L3 - 4)组。根据分组通过椎间隙进行硬膜外镇痛。主要结局是镇痛开始后15分钟时无痛子宫收缩的百分比。次要结局包括5分钟和10分钟时无痛状态的百分比、感觉阻滞平面、运动阻滞评估、产妇不良事件、硬膜外镇痛药物用量、阿氏评分以及产妇对镇痛的评价。
2023年4月至2023年8月,最终共招募150名女性,其中136名被纳入分析(每组68名)。与L3 - 4组相比,L2 - 3组在镇痛开始后5分钟、10分钟和15分钟时无痛子宫收缩的比例显著更高(分别为20.6%对7.4%,52.9%对26.5%,80.9%对64.7%,P分别为0.026、0.
002和0.034)。同样,L2 - 3组在5分钟、10分钟和15分钟时的疼痛评分低于L3 - 4组(分别为5(4,7)对6(5,7),3(2,5)对4(3,6),2(1,3)对3(2,5),P分别为0.006、0.004和0.020)。此外,通过L2 - 3椎间隙穿刺使产妇对镇痛过程的评价更高(9(8,9)对8(8,9),P < 0.001)。然而,两组在感觉阻滞、运动阻滞或不良事件方面无显著差异。
通过L2 - 3椎间隙穿刺可使产妇更快缓解疼痛且体验更佳。这些发现为麻醉医生进行硬膜外分娩镇痛提供了一个更好的选择。关键信息 关于该主题已了解什么?硬膜外镇痛是缓解分娩疼痛的有效方法。本研究补充了什么?通过腰2 - 3椎间隙穿刺可使硬膜外镇痛起效更快。本研究可能如何影响研究、实践或政策?在进行硬膜外分娩镇痛时,就缓解疼痛速度和产妇满意度而言,腰2 - 3椎间隙是更好的选择。