Sehatpour Pejman, Kantrowitz Joshua T
New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York; College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York; Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, New York.
New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, New York; College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York; Nathan Kline Institute, Orangeburg, New York.
Biol Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 15;97(2):128-138. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2024.08.019. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) and related deficits in learning (plasticity) are among the leading causes of disability in schizophrenia. Despite this, there are no Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for CIAS, and the development of treatments has been limited by numerous phase 2/3 failures of compounds that showed initial promise in small-scale studies. NMDA-type glutamate receptors (NMDARs) have been proposed to play an important role in schizophrenia; moreover, the NMDAR has a well-characterized role in cognition, learning, and neuroplasticity. We review previously published clinical trials in CIAS that focused on NMDAR modulator treatments, focusing on published and recent developments of the use of novel NMDAR-modulating treatments for CIAS both alone and combined with plasticity/learning paradigms to enhance learning. We use this discussion of previous studies to highlight the importance of incorporating pharmacodynamic target engagement biomarkers early in treatment development, which can help predict which compounds will succeed or fail in phase 3. A range of direct and indirect NMDAR modulators are covered, including D-serine, D-cycloserine, memantine, and glycine and first-generation glycine transport inhibitors (e.g., sarcosine and bitopertin), as well as recent positive studies of iclepertin, a novel glycine transport inhibitor, and luvadaxistat, a D-amino acid oxidase inhibitor that increases brain D-serine levels, and indirect noninvasive brain stimulation NMDAR-modulating treatments. Several examples of successful use of pharmacodynamic target engagement biomarkers for dose/drug discovery are emphasized, including the mismatch negativity, auditory steady state, and time-frequency event-related potential approaches.
与精神分裂症相关的认知障碍(CIAS)及相关学习缺陷(可塑性)是精神分裂症致残的主要原因之一。尽管如此,美国食品药品监督管理局尚未批准用于治疗CIAS的药物,且治疗药物的研发因众多化合物在2/3期试验失败而受限,这些化合物在小规模研究中曾展现出初步前景。N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)型谷氨酸受体(NMDARs)被认为在精神分裂症中起重要作用;此外,NMDAR在认知、学习和神经可塑性方面的作用已得到充分认识。我们回顾了此前发表的针对CIAS的临床试验,这些试验聚焦于NMDAR调节剂治疗,重点关注新型NMDAR调节治疗单独使用以及与可塑性/学习范式联合使用以增强学习能力在CIAS治疗中的已发表及最新进展。我们通过对先前研究的讨论,强调在治疗开发早期纳入药效学靶点参与生物标志物的重要性,这有助于预测哪些化合物将在3期试验中成功或失败。文中涵盖了一系列直接和间接的NMDAR调节剂,包括D-丝氨酸、D-环丝氨酸、美金刚、甘氨酸以及第一代甘氨酸转运抑制剂(如肌氨酸和比特培南),还有新型甘氨酸转运抑制剂iclepertin和可提高脑内D-丝氨酸水平的D-氨基酸氧化酶抑制剂鲁伐达西他的近期阳性研究,以及间接非侵入性脑刺激NMDAR调节治疗。文中强调了药效学靶点参与生物标志物在剂量/药物发现中成功应用的几个例子,包括失配负波、听觉稳态和时频事件相关电位方法。