• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于模糊 TOPSIS 的高密度住宅区低影响开发方法优先级排序方法。

A fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach for prioritizing low-impact development methods in high-density residential areas.

机构信息

Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture Technology (Aburaihan), College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran E-mail:

Department of Water Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture Technology (Aburaihan), College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Water Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;89(2):484-503. doi: 10.2166/wst.2024.006.

DOI:10.2166/wst.2024.006
PMID:39219143
Abstract

The study successfully implemented six low-impact development (LID) methods to manage surface runoff in urban areas: green roof, infiltration trench, bio retention cell, rain barrel, green roof combined with infiltration trench, and rain barrel combined with bio-retention cell. Each method has unique benefits in mitigating surface runoff effects in urban environments. The following four indicators were used to evaluate the methods: runoff volume reduction, peak runoff flow rate reduction, economic sustainability, and social sustainability. The study, which lasted approximately 4 months, was conducted in an eastern Tehran metropolis residential area with a mix of old and new buildings. The SWMM model determined runoff volume and peak flow values, and a price analysis list determined the economic index. Local experts completed 25 questionnaires to evaluate the social index. Fuzzy TOPSIS multi-indicator decision criteria were used to prioritize LID methods, and the Rain barrel + Bio retention cell combined scenario emerged as the best option based on all four criteria. The method reduced peak runoff flow by 23.1-66.1% under rainfall with 10-year return periods. The green roof + infiltration trench method had the highest percentage reduction of 2,737 m, while the infiltration trench had the lowest reduction of 273 m.

摘要

该研究成功实施了六种低影响开发(LID)方法来管理城市地区的地表径流:绿色屋顶、渗透沟渠、生物滞留池、雨水桶、绿色屋顶与渗透沟渠结合以及雨水桶与生物滞留池结合。每种方法在减轻城市环境中地表径流影响方面都具有独特的优势。以下四个指标用于评估这些方法:径流量减少、峰值径流量减少、经济可持续性和社会可持续性。这项为期约 4 个月的研究在德黑兰东部一个新旧建筑混合的大都市住宅区进行。SWMM 模型确定了径流量和峰值流量值,价格分析清单确定了经济指标。当地专家完成了 25 份问卷,以评估社会指数。模糊 TOPSIS 多指标决策标准用于对 LID 方法进行优先级排序,根据所有四个标准,雨水桶+生物滞留池联合方案是最佳选择。该方法在降雨重现期为 10 年的情况下,将峰值径流量减少了 23.1-66.1%。绿色屋顶+渗透沟渠法的减少百分比最高,为 2,737 立方米,而渗透沟渠的减少百分比最低,为 273 立方米。

相似文献

1
A fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach for prioritizing low-impact development methods in high-density residential areas.基于模糊 TOPSIS 的高密度住宅区低影响开发方法优先级排序方法。
Water Sci Technol. 2024 Jan;89(2):484-503. doi: 10.2166/wst.2024.006.
2
[Comparison on the stormwater runoff effects of roof greening in different urban functional areas].不同城市功能区屋顶绿化对雨水径流影响的比较
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2023 Feb;34(2):491-498. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202303.019.
3
An integrated framework for the comprehensive evaluation of low impact development strategies.低影响开发策略综合评价的集成框架。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Sep 15;294:113023. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113023. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
4
Assessment of low impact development (LID) strategies under different land uses in an urban sub-catchment in the Philippines.评估菲律宾城市子流域不同土地利用下的低影响开发(LID)策略。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Oct;369:122328. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122328. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
5
Simulating the effects of low impact development approaches on urban flooding: a case study from Tehran, Iran.模拟低影响开发措施对城市内涝的影响:来自伊朗德黑兰的案例研究。
Water Sci Technol. 2019 Oct;80(8):1591-1600. doi: 10.2166/wst.2019.412.
6
Enhancing the SWAT model for creating efficient rainwater harvesting and reuse strategies to improve water resources management.增强 SWAT 模型以制定高效的雨水收集和再利用策略,改善水资源管理。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Aug;366:121829. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121829. Epub 2024 Jul 16.
7
Cost-effectiveness analysis of extensive green roofs for urban stormwater control in response to future climate change scenarios.应对未来气候变化情景的城市雨水控制用大面积绿色屋顶的成本效益分析。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 15;856(Pt 1):159127. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159127. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
8
Rainwater runoff retention on an aged intensive green roof.雨水在老旧密集型绿色屋顶上的滞留。
Sci Total Environ. 2013 Sep 1;461-462:28-38. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.04.085. Epub 2013 May 24.
9
Integrated approach for low impact development locating in dense residential areas based on sustainable development criteria.基于可持续发展标准的密集住宅区低影响开发的综合方法。
Water Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;86(6):1590-1612. doi: 10.2166/wst.2022.290.
10
Effectiveness of low impact development practices in two urbanized watersheds: retrofitting with rain barrel/cistern and porous pavement.低影响开发实践在两个城市化流域中的有效性:通过雨水桶/蓄水池和多孔路面进行改造。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Apr 15;119:151-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.019. Epub 2013 Mar 8.