Nakajima Tomohiro, Shibata Tsuyoshi, Mukawa Kei, Miura Shuhei, Arihara Ayaka, Mizuno Takakimi, Nakanishi Keitaro, Iba Yutaka, Kawaharada Nobuyoshi
Cardiovascular Surgery, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, JPN.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 31;16(7):e65822. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65822. eCollection 2024 Jul.
Aortic dissection with malperfusion necessitates emergency surgery and is associated with poor outcomes. Therefore, in this study, we analyzed patients' treatment courses from the initial management to hospital discharge in cases of acute aortic dissection (AAD) with malperfusion and investigated the risk factors associated with mortality.
We evaluated cases of AAD with malperfusion treated at our institution over a 16-year period from 2007 to 2022. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. The study's primary outcome measure was mortality during hospitalization. We collected and analyzed data encompassing preoperative patient characteristics, Stanford classification, sites of preoperative malperfusion, surgical techniques employed, and postoperative complications. These variables were examined to identify factors associated with in-hospital mortality.
During the study period, 366 patients were admitted with AAD, 102 of whom had malperfusion. There were 62 men (61%) and 40 women (39%), with a mean age of 64 ± 13 years (range: 28-87 years). According to the Stanford classification, 75 (74%) and 27 (26%) patients had type A and B aortic dissection, respectively, and 29 patients (28%) presented with shock. Preoperative malperfusion sites included the brain, coronary arteries, abdominal viscera, limbs, and spinal cord in 40 (39%), 10 (10%), 34 (33%), 52 (51%), and six (6%) patients, respectively. Eleven (11%) patients required immediate intervention in the emergency department. The treatments administered to the patients were as follows: ascending aortic replacement, 30 (29%) patients; aortic arch replacement, 34 (33%) patients; root replacement, three (3%) patients; thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), 12 (12%) patients; non-anatomic bypass, five (5%) patients; and conservative management, five (5%) patients. In-hospital mortality occurred in 23 (23%) patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified preoperative coronary malperfusion as an independent risk factor of mortality.
Preoperative coronary malperfusion is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality in patients with AAD presenting with malperfusion.
伴有灌注不良的主动脉夹层需要紧急手术,且预后较差。因此,在本研究中,我们分析了急性主动脉夹层(AAD)伴灌注不良患者从初始治疗到出院的治疗过程,并调查了与死亡率相关的危险因素。
我们评估了2007年至2022年期间在我院接受治疗的AAD伴灌注不良病例。主要终点是住院死亡率。该研究的主要结局指标是住院期间的死亡率。我们收集并分析了包括术前患者特征、斯坦福分类、术前灌注不良部位、采用的手术技术和术后并发症在内的数据。对这些变量进行检查以确定与住院死亡率相关 的因素。
在研究期间,366例患者因AAD入院,其中102例伴有灌注不良。男性62例(61%),女性40例(39%),平均年龄64±13岁(范围:28 - 8岁)。根据斯坦福分类,75例(74%)和27例(26%)患者分别患有A型和B型主动脉夹层,29例(28%)患者出现休克。术前灌注不良部位分别为脑、冠状动脉、腹部脏器、肢体和脊髓的患者有40例(39%)、10例(10%)、34例(33%)、52例(51%)和6例(6%)。11例(11%)患者在急诊科需要立即干预。给予患者的治疗如下:升主动脉置换术30例(29%);主动脉弓置换术34例(33%);根部置换术3例(3%);胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)12例(12%);非解剖旁路手术5例(5%);保守治疗5例(5%)。23例(23%)患者发生住院死亡。多因素logistic回归分析确定术前冠状动脉灌注不良是死亡率的独立危险因素。
术前冠状动脉灌注不良是AAD伴灌注不良患者住院死亡的独立危险因素。