Calogeras R C
Psychoanal Rev. 1985 Spring;72(1):31-53.
In this paper I have tried to show how certain early object-relations conflicts in marital interaction had their principal source in the rapprochement phase of the separation-individuation process. The clinical material suggested that only a tenuous separation from the early mother had been achieved, and now the spouse (be it husband or wife) had become the new maternal representation; the early mother-child interaction was being recapitulated once again between husband and wife. It was the conflicts and vicissitudes of the rapprochement crisis which were instrumental in shaping the patient's infantile neurosis and not just the oedipal struggle of the infantile neurosis prototype. The clinical material furthers confirmation of marriage as a viable developmental phase. Considering such marital interaction from the point of view of our analytic technique, it provided a unique occurrence where the infantile neurosis, the adult neurosis (i.e., the pathological marital union) and the transference neurosis came together. Two issues were thrown into clearer focus by this confluence: first, the repetition compulsion principle was distinctly demonstrated; and second, support for recovery of experience from preverbal and semiverbal stages of early object relations was forthcoming.
在本文中，我试图展示婚姻互动中某些早期客体关系冲突如何在分离-个体化过程的和解阶段有其主要根源。临床资料表明，与早期母亲的分离仅勉强实现，现在配偶（无论是丈夫还是妻子）已成为新的母亲表征；早期的母婴互动在夫妻之间再次重演。正是和解危机的冲突与变迁塑造了患者的婴儿期神经症，而不仅仅是婴儿期神经症原型的俄狄浦斯冲突。临床资料进一步证实了婚姻是一个可行的发展阶段。从我们的分析技术角度考虑这种婚姻互动，它提供了一个独特的情况，即婴儿期神经症、成人神经症（即病态的婚姻结合）和移情神经症同时出现。这种融合使两个问题更加清晰地凸显出来：第一，明显证明了重复强迫原则；第二，为从早期客体关系的前语言和半语言阶段恢复经验提供了支持。
