Zhu Rong-Hua, Li Peng-Cheng, Zhang Jie, Song Hua-Hua
Department of General Surgery, Chongming Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai 202150, China.
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Chongming Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Science, Shanghai 202150, China.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Aug 27;16(8):2484-2493. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2484.
Gastric cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Traditional open surgery for gastric cancer is often associated with significant morbidity and prolonged recovery.
To evaluate the effectiveness of laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery as an alternative to traditional open surgery for gastric cancer, focusing on its potential to reduce trauma, accelerate recovery, and achieve comparable oncological outcomes.
This study retrospectively analyzed 203 patients with gastric cancer who underwent surgery at the Shanghai Health Medical College Affiliated Chongming Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: Minimally invasive surgery group ( = 102), who underwent laparoscopic gastrectomy, and open surgery group ( = 101), who underwent traditional open gastrectomy. We compared surgical indicators (surgical incision size, intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, and number of lymph nodes dissected), recovery parameters (time to first flatus, time to start eating, time to ambulation, and length of hospital stay), immune function (levels of IgA, IgG, and IgM), intestinal barrier function (levels of D-lactic acid and diamine oxidase), and stress response (levels of C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and procalcitonin).
The minimally invasive surgery group demonstrated significantly better outcomes in terms of surgical indicators, including smaller incisions, less blood loss, shorter surgery time, and more lymph nodes dissected ( < 0.05 for all). Recovery was also faster in the minimally invasive surgery group, with earlier return of bowel function, earlier initiation of diet, quicker mobilization, and shorter hospital stays ( < 0.05 for all). Furthermore, patients in the minimally invasive surgery group had better preserved immune function, superior intestinal barrier function, and a less pronounced stress response postoperatively ( < 0.05 for all).
Laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for gastric cancer not only provides superior surgical indicators and faster recovery but also offers advantages in preserving immune function, protecting intestinal barrier function, and mitigating the stress response compared to traditional open surgery. These findings support the broader adoption of laparoscopic techniques in the management of gastric cancer.
在全球范围内,胃癌仍然是癌症相关死亡的主要原因。传统的胃癌开放手术通常伴随着较高的发病率和较长的恢复时间。
评估腹腔镜微创手术作为胃癌传统开放手术替代方案的有效性,重点关注其减少创伤、加速恢复并实现可比肿瘤学结果的潜力。
本研究回顾性分析了2020年1月至2023年12月在上海健康医学院附属崇明医院接受手术的203例胃癌患者。患者分为两组:微创手术组(n = 102),接受腹腔镜胃切除术;开放手术组(n = 101),接受传统开放胃切除术。我们比较了手术指标(手术切口大小、术中出血量、手术时间和清扫淋巴结数量)、恢复参数(首次排气时间、开始进食时间、下床活动时间和住院时间)、免疫功能(IgA、IgG和IgM水平)、肠屏障功能(D - 乳酸和二胺氧化酶水平)以及应激反应(C反应蛋白、白细胞介素 - 6和降钙素原水平)。
微创手术组在手术指标方面表现出明显更好的结果,包括切口更小、出血量更少、手术时间更短和清扫淋巴结更多(所有P < 0.05)。微创手术组的恢复也更快,肠道功能恢复更早、饮食开始更早、活动更快且住院时间更短(所有P < 0.05)。此外,微创手术组患者术后免疫功能保存更好、肠屏障功能更优且应激反应更轻(所有P < 0.05)。
与传统开放手术相比,腹腔镜微创手术治疗胃癌不仅提供了更好的手术指标和更快的恢复,而且在保存免疫功能、保护肠屏障功能和减轻应激反应方面也具有优势。这些发现支持在胃癌治疗中更广泛地采用腹腔镜技术。