Suppr超能文献

公民科学从业者的经验与实践数据集。

A dataset of citizen science practitioners' experiences and practices.

作者信息

O'Grady Michael, Mangina Eleni

机构信息

School of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

出版信息

Data Brief. 2024 Jul 31;56:110779. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110779. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

There has been renewed interest in Citizen Science (CS) in recent years as it offers an intriguing vision of enabling a scientifically literate population engage in scientific investigations and policy formation. Nonetheless, citizen scientists remain an understudied population, possibly due to the voluntary and part-time nature of their endeavours. Here, a dataset of CS practitioners' experiences collected using an online survey is presented. The survey sample comprises 100 adults (18+) active in diverse CS projects. The survey contains 47 questions designed for quantitative analysis. Questions cluster around several broad themes - participant demographics, project profiles, experience in citizen science, data collection practices, management, dissemination, knowledge of open research principles, and training received. The dataset offers the potential for further empirical research or as a baseline for subsequent surveys, and will interest anybody planning a CS initiative. The questionnaire constitutes a ready-to-deploy instrument for additional country, region, or initiative-level surveys.

摘要

近年来,公民科学(CS)重新引起了人们的兴趣,因为它提供了一个引人入胜的愿景,即让具备科学素养的人群参与科学调查和政策制定。尽管如此,公民科学家仍然是一个研究不足的群体,这可能是由于他们的工作具有自愿和兼职的性质。在此,我们展示了一个通过在线调查收集的公民科学从业者经验的数据集。该调查样本包括100名活跃于各种公民科学项目的成年人(18岁及以上)。该调查包含47个用于定量分析的问题。问题围绕几个广泛的主题展开——参与者人口统计学、项目概况、公民科学经验、数据收集实践、管理、传播、开放研究原则知识以及接受的培训。该数据集为进一步的实证研究提供了潜力,或作为后续调查的基线,并且会引起任何计划开展公民科学倡议的人的兴趣。该问卷构成了一个可随时用于其他国家、地区或倡议层面调查的工具。

相似文献

1
A dataset of citizen science practitioners' experiences and practices.
Data Brief. 2024 Jul 31;56:110779. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110779. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Modeling intrinsic factors of inclusive engagement in citizen science: Insights from the participants' survey analysis of CSI-COP.
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 28;18(11):e0294575. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294575. eCollection 2023.
4
Do biodiversity monitoring citizen science surveys meet the core principles of open science practices?
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jan 12;195(2):295. doi: 10.1007/s10661-022-10887-y.
5
A Model for Engaging Citizen Scientists: A Community-Partnered Research Collaboration to Address Inequities for Black Birthing People.
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Sep;28(9):1495-1505. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03974-8. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
8
Why the views of Latin American Scientists on Citizen Science as a Tool for Pollinator Monitoring and Conservation Matter?
Neotrop Entomol. 2020 Aug;49(4):604-613. doi: 10.1007/s13744-020-00793-8. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
10
Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Jan;25(1):2-16. doi: 10.1177/0963662515607406. Epub 2015 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Community engagement and data quality: best practices and lessons learned from a citizen science project on birdsong.
J Ornithol. 2023;164(1):233-244. doi: 10.1007/s10336-022-02018-8. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
2
The Limitations of Online Surveys.
Indian J Psychol Med. 2020 Oct 13;42(6):575-576. doi: 10.1177/0253717620957496. eCollection 2020 Nov.
3
Citizen science, public policy.
Science. 2018 Jul 13;361(6398):134-136. doi: 10.1126/science.aar8379.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验