相似文献
1
Citizen science, public policy.
Science. 2018 Jul 13;361(6398):134-136. doi: 10.1126/science.aar8379.
2
Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science?
Public Underst Sci. 2016 Jan;25(1):2-16. doi: 10.1177/0963662515607406. Epub 2015 Oct 7.
3
A Science Products Inventory for Citizen-Science Planning and Evaluation.
Bioscience. 2018 Jun 1;68(6):436-444. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biy028. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
4
A Science Products Inventory for Citizen-Science Planning and Evaluation.
Bioscience. 2018 Jun 1;68(6):436-444. doi: 10.1093/bioscience/biy028. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
5
Citizen science or scientific citizenship? Disentangling the uses of public engagement rhetoric in national research initiatives.
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Jun 4;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0117-1.
6
Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions.
Public Underst Sci. 2014 Jan;23(1):107-20. doi: 10.1177/0963662513497324. Epub 2013 Aug 27.
7
Citizen science: a new direction in canine behavior research.
Behav Processes. 2015 Jan;110:125-32. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2014.10.014. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
8
Crowdsourcing conservation: The role of citizen science in securing a future for seagrass.
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Sep;134:210-215. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.11.005. Epub 2017 Nov 12.
9
A framework for evaluating and designing citizen science programs for natural resources monitoring.
Conserv Biol. 2016 Jun;30(3):456-66. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12697. Epub 2016 Apr 25.
10
Understanding the (inter)disciplinary and institutional diversity of citizen science: A survey of current practice in Germany and Austria.
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 27;12(6):e0178778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178778. eCollection 2017.
引用本文的文献
1
A dataset of citizen science practitioners' experiences and practices.
Data Brief. 2024 Jul 31;56:110779. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110779. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Crowdsourcing smartphone data for biomedical research: Ethical and legal questions.
Digit Health. 2023 Oct 3;9:20552076231204428. doi: 10.1177/20552076231204428. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
3
Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study.
Biosocieties. 2023 Mar 28:1-22. doi: 10.1057/s41292-023-00301-2.
4
An Ethics Framework for Evaluating Ownership Practices in Biomedical Citizen Science.
Citiz Sci. 2022;7(1). doi: 10.5334/cstp.537. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
5
Citizen science: How to extend reciprocal benefits from the project community to the broader socio-ecological system.
Quant Plant Biol. 2022 Oct 3;3:e20. doi: 10.1017/qpb.2022.16. eCollection 2022.
6
Core values of genomic citizen science: results from a qualitative interview study.
Biosocieties. 2022 Jun;17(2):203-228. doi: 10.1057/s41292-020-00208-2. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
7
"A cohort of pirate ships": biomedical citizen scientists' attitudes toward ethical oversight.
Citiz Sci. 2021;6(1). doi: 10.5334/cstp.360. Epub 2021 May 20.
8
Demonstrating an approach for evaluating synthetic geospatial and temporal epidemiologic data utility: results from analyzing >1.8 million SARS-CoV-2 tests in the United States National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C).
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 Jul 12;29(8):1350-1365. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac045.
9
Measuring epistemic success of a biodiversity citizen science program: A citation study.
PLoS One. 2021 Oct 11;16(10):e0258350. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258350. eCollection 2021.
10
A best-worst scaling experiment to prioritize concern about ethical issues in citizen science reveals heterogeneity on people-level v. data-level issues.
Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 27;11(1):19119. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96743-4.
本文引用的文献
1
Citizen Science on Your Smartphone: An ELSI Research Agenda.
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Winter;43(4):897-903. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12327.
2
Rise of the citizen scientist.
Nature. 2015 Aug 20;524(7565):265. doi: 10.1038/524265a.
3
Research conducted using data obtained through online communities: ethical implications of methodological limitations.
PLoS Med. 2012;9(10):e1001328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001328. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
4
Advocacy groups as research organizations: the PXE International example.
Nat Rev Genet. 2007 Feb;8(2):157-64. doi: 10.1038/nrg1991.
Zotero 插件