• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多支动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术与女性生存率的提高相关。

Multiple arterial coronary bypass grafting is associated with greater survival in women.

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Schulich Heart Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Heart. 2021 Jun;107(11):888-894. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317737. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317737
PMID:33082174
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8055724/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Multiple arterial grafting (MAG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is associated with higher survival and freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in observational studies of mostly men. It is not known whether MAG is beneficial in women. Our objectives were to compare the long-term clinical outcomes of MAG versus single arterial grafting (SAG) in women undergoing CABG for multivessel disease.

METHODS

Clinical and administrative databases for Ontario, Canada, were linked to obtain all women with angiographic evidence of left main, triple or double vessel disease undergoing isolated non-emergent primary CABG from 2008 to 2019. 1:1 propensity score matching was performed. Late mortality and MACCE (composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularisation and death) were compared between the matched groups with a stratified log-rank test and Cox proportional-hazards model.

RESULTS

2961 and 7954 women underwent CABG with MAG and SAG, respectively, for multivessel disease. Prior to propensity-score matching, compared with SAG, those who underwent MAG were younger (66.0 vs 68.9 years) and had less comorbidities. After propensity-score matching, in 2446 well-matched pairs, there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality (1.6% vs 1.8%, p=0.43) between MAG and SAG. Over a median and maximum follow-up of 5.0 and 11.0 years, respectively, MAG was associated with greater survival (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.98) and freedom from MACCE (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76 to 0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

MAG was associated with greater survival and freedom from MACCE and should be considered for women with good life expectancy requiring CABG.

摘要

目的

在大多数为男性的观察性研究中,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)中采用多支动脉搭桥(MAG)与更高的生存率和免于主要不良心脏和脑血管事件(MACCE)相关。目前尚不清楚 MAG 是否对女性有益。我们的目的是比较 MAG 与单支动脉搭桥(SAG)在女性多支血管病变行 CABG 中的长期临床结局。

方法

将加拿大安大略省的临床和行政数据库进行链接,以获取 2008 年至 2019 年间所有经血管造影证实左主干、三支或双支血管疾病并接受择期非紧急性原发性 CABG 的女性患者的临床资料。采用 1:1 倾向评分匹配。采用分层对数秩检验和 Cox 比例风险模型比较匹配组之间的晚期死亡率和 MACCE(包括卒中和心肌梗死、再次血运重建和死亡)。

结果

2961 名女性接受 MAG 治疗,7954 名女性接受 SAG 治疗,用于多支血管疾病。在进行倾向评分匹配之前,与 SAG 相比,MAG 组患者年龄更小(66.0 岁 vs 68.9 岁)且合并症更少。在 2446 对匹配良好的患者中,MAG 与 SAG 之间 30 天死亡率无显著差异(1.6% vs 1.8%,p=0.43)。在中位和最大随访时间分别为 5.0 年和 11.0 年期间,MAG 与更好的生存率(HR 0.85,95%CI 0.75 至 0.98)和免于 MACCE(HR 0.85,95%CI 0.76 至 0.95)相关。

结论

MAG 与更好的生存率和免于 MACCE 相关,对于预期寿命较长且需要 CABG 的女性应考虑采用。

相似文献

1
Multiple arterial coronary bypass grafting is associated with greater survival in women.多支动脉冠状动脉旁路移植术与女性生存率的提高相关。
Heart. 2021 Jun;107(11):888-894. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2020-317737. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
Multiple Arterial Grafting Is Associated With Better Outcomes for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients.多支动脉搭桥术与冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的更好结局相关。
Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138(19):2081-2090. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034464.
3
Long-Term Survival After Surgical or Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes and Multivessel Coronary Disease.糖尿病合并多支血管病变患者行血运重建治疗后的长期生存情况。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 8;76(10):1153-1164. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.052.
4
Long-term Outcomes of Multiple Arterial Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Population-Based Study of Patients in British Columbia, Canada.多支冠状动脉旁路移植术的长期结果:加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省患者的基于人群研究。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;2(11):1187-1196. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3705.
5
Multiple Versus Single Arterial Coronary Bypass Graft Surgery for Multivessel Disease.多支血管病变的冠状动脉旁路移植术:单支与多支动脉。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Sep 10;74(10):1275-1285. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.06.067.
6
Multiple arterial grafting confers survival advantage compared to percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents in multivessel coronary artery disease: A propensity score adjusted analysis.在多支冠状动脉疾病中,与药物洗脱支架经皮介入治疗相比,多动脉血管移植术具有生存优势:一项倾向评分调整分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2015;189:153-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.04.059. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
7
Long-term Outcomes Associated With Total Arterial Revascularization vs Non-Total Arterial Revascularization.全动脉血运重建与非全动脉血运重建相关的长期结局。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1;5(5):507-514. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.6104.
8
[Comparison on the long-term outcomes post percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting for bifurcation lesions in unprotected left main coronary artery].[经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗无保护左主干冠状动脉分叉病变的长期预后比较]
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017 Jan 25;45(1):19-25. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3758.2017.01.005.
9
Efficacy of multiple arterial coronary bypass grafting in patients with diabetes mellitus.糖尿病患者多动脉冠状动脉搭桥术的疗效
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Sep;50(3):520-7. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw138. Epub 2016 Apr 24.
10
Multiple arterial versus single arterial grafting in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥手术中多支动脉与单支动脉移植的比较。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jan 28;13:119-135. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.01.010. eCollection 2023 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparative Analysis of Single Versus Multiple Arterial Grafts in Coronary Arterial Bypass Grafting: Initial Experience in Iraq.冠状动脉搭桥术中单支与多支动脉移植物的比较分析:伊拉克的初步经验
Cureus. 2024 Aug 2;16(8):e66009. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66009. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting in robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: 10-year outcomes.机器人辅助不停跳全胸腔镜冠状动脉搭桥术中双侧胸廓内动脉移植:10年结果
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jul 31;13(4):354-363. doi: 10.21037/acs-2024-rcabg-0016. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
3
Multiple arterial versus single arterial grafting in patients with diabetes undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Meta-Analysis Comparing Multiple Arterial Grafts Versus Single Arterial Graft for Coronary-Artery Bypass Grafting.多动脉移植物与单动脉移植物在冠状动脉旁路移植术中的比较的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;130:46-55. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.06.012. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
2
Association of Radial Artery Graft vs Saphenous Vein Graft With Long-term Cardiovascular Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后桡动脉桥与隐静脉桥对患者长期心血管结局的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2020 Jul 14;324(2):179-187. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8228.
3
糖尿病患者冠状动脉搭桥手术中多支动脉与单支动脉移植的比较。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jan 28;13:119-135. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.01.010. eCollection 2023 Mar.
4
Long-Term Survival of Multiple Versus Single Arterial Coronary Bypass Grafting in Elderly Patients.老年患者多支与单支冠状动脉搭桥术的长期生存情况
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 30;12(7):2594. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072594.
5
Late Clinical Outcomes of Total Arterial Revascularization or Multiple Arterial Grafting Compared to Conventional Single Arterial with Saphenous Vein Grafting for Coronary Surgery.与冠状动脉手术中传统单动脉加隐静脉移植相比,全动脉血运重建或多动脉移植的晚期临床结果。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 27;12(7):2516. doi: 10.3390/jcm12072516.
6
Reconstruction Technique Options for Achieving Total Arterial Revascularization and Multiple Arterial Grafting.实现全动脉血运重建和多动脉搭桥的重建技术选择
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 15;12(6):2275. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062275.
7
Differences in long-term survival outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting using single vs multiple arterial grafts: a meta-analysis with reconstructed time-to-event data and subgroup analyses.单支与多支动脉旁路移植术治疗冠状动脉旁路移植术后长期生存结局的差异:一项使用重建时间事件数据和亚组分析的荟萃分析。
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Feb;71(2):77-89. doi: 10.1007/s11748-022-01891-7. Epub 2022 Nov 17.
8
Coronary artery bypass with single versus multiple arterial grafts in women: A meta-analysis.冠状动脉旁路移植术中单支与多支动脉移植物在女性中的应用:一项荟萃分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Mar;165(3):1093-1098. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2021.07.047. Epub 2021 Aug 10.
Effect of Skeletonization of Bilateral Internal Thoracic Arteries on Deep Sternal Wound Infections.
双侧胸廓内动脉骨骼化对深部胸骨伤口感染的影响。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 Feb;111(2):600-606. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.05.044. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
4
Sex differences after coronary artery bypass grafting with a second arterial conduit.冠状动脉旁路移植术后使用第二种动脉移植物的性别差异。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Feb;163(2):686-695.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.04.058. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
5
Long-term Outcomes Associated With Total Arterial Revascularization vs Non-Total Arterial Revascularization.全动脉血运重建与非全动脉血运重建相关的长期结局。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1;5(5):507-514. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.6104.
6
Sex Differences in Long-Term Survival After Major Cardiac Surgery: A Population-Based Cohort Study.性别对重大心脏手术后长期生存的影响:基于人群的队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 3;8(17):e013260. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013260. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
7
Importance of Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease in the Prognosis of Patients With Heart Failure.非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病对心力衰竭患者预后的重要性。
JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;7(6):493-501. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2019.02.014. Epub 2019 May 8.
8
Bilateral versus Single Internal-Thoracic-Artery Grafts at 10 Years.双侧与单根胸廓内动脉桥在 10 年时的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 31;380(5):437-446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1808783.
9
Multiple Arterial Grafting Is Associated With Better Outcomes for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients.多支动脉搭桥术与冠状动脉旁路移植术患者的更好结局相关。
Circulation. 2018 Nov 6;138(19):2081-2090. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034464.
10
Prevalence and Long-Term Survival After Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Women and Men With Heart Failure and Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction.心力衰竭伴射血分数保留与降低的女性和男性患者行冠状动脉旁路移植术的患病率和长期生存情况。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 16;7(12):e008902. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008902.