• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种使用面部评分量表评估牙科焦虑和恐惧的新型简短问卷。

A novel brief questionnaire using a face rating scale to assess dental anxiety and fear.

作者信息

Mino Takuya, Kimura-Ono Aya, Arakawa Hikaru, Tokumoto Kana, Kurosaki Yoko, Matsuka Yoshizo, Maekawa Kenji, Kuboki Takuo

机构信息

Department of Removable Prosthodontics and Occlusion, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan.

Department of Oral Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Okayama University Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Aug;16(4):244-254. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.4.244. Epub 2024 Aug 20.

DOI:10.4047/jap.2024.16.4.244
PMID:39221413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11361820/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of a four-item questionnaire using a face rating scale to measure dental trait anxiety (DTA), dental trait fear (DTF), dental state anxiety (DSA), and dental state fear (DSF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants were consecutively selected from patients undergoing scaling (S-group; n = 47) and implant placement (I-group; n = 25). The S-group completed the questionnaire both before initial and second scaling, whereas the I-group responded on the pre-surgery day (Pre-day), the day of implant placement (Imp-day), and the day of suture removal (Post-day).

RESULTS

The reliability in the S-group was evaluated using the test-retest method, showing a weighted kappa value of DTA, 0.61; DTF, 0.46; DSA, 0.67; DSF, 0.52. Criterion-related validity, assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory's trait anxiety and state anxiety, revealed positive correlations between trait anxiety and DTA/DTF (DTA, ρ = 0.30; DTF, ρ = 0.27, ρ: correlation coefficient) and between state anxiety and all four items (DTA, ρ = 0.41; DTF, ρ = 0.32; DSA, ρ = 0.25; DSF, ρ = 0.25). Known-group validity was assessed using the initial data and Imp-day data from the S-group and I-group, respectively, revealing significantly higher DSA and DSF scores in the I-group than in the S-group. Responsiveness was gauged using I-group data, showing significantly lower DSA and DSF scores on post-day compared to other days.

CONCLUSION

The newly developed questionnaire has acceptable reliability and validity for clinical use, suggesting its usefulness for research on dental anxiety and fear and for providing patient-specific dental care.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估一份使用面部评定量表的四项问卷在测量牙科特质焦虑(DTA)、牙科特质恐惧(DTF)、牙科状态焦虑(DSA)和牙科状态恐惧(DSF)方面的信度和效度。

材料与方法

连续选取接受洗牙治疗的患者(洗牙组;n = 47)和接受种植体植入的患者(种植组;n = 25)作为研究对象。洗牙组在首次洗牙前和第二次洗牙前均完成问卷填写,而种植组在手术前一天(术前日)、种植体植入当天(植入日)和拆线当天(术后日)进行作答。

结果

洗牙组的信度采用重测法进行评估,结果显示DTA的加权kappa值为0.61;DTF为0.46;DSA为0.67;DSF为0.52。使用状态-特质焦虑量表的特质焦虑和状态焦虑评估的效标关联效度显示,特质焦虑与DTA/DTF之间存在正相关(DTA,ρ = 0.30;DTF,ρ = 0.27,ρ:相关系数),状态焦虑与所有四项之间也存在正相关(DTA,ρ = 0.41;DTF,ρ = 0.32;DSA,ρ = 0.25;DSF,ρ = 0.25)。已知组效度分别使用洗牙组和种植组的初始数据以及植入日数据进行评估,结果显示种植组的DSA和DSF得分显著高于洗牙组。反应度采用种植组数据进行衡量,结果显示术后日的DSA和DSF得分显著低于其他日期。

结论

新开发的问卷在临床应用中具有可接受的信度和效度,表明其在牙科焦虑和恐惧研究以及提供个性化牙科护理方面具有实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53b/11361820/a98a9fcd358b/jap-16-244-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53b/11361820/1689b2506fd6/jap-16-244-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53b/11361820/813ea9febcd1/jap-16-244-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53b/11361820/a98a9fcd358b/jap-16-244-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53b/11361820/1689b2506fd6/jap-16-244-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53b/11361820/813ea9febcd1/jap-16-244-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a53b/11361820/a98a9fcd358b/jap-16-244-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
A novel brief questionnaire using a face rating scale to assess dental anxiety and fear.一种使用面部评分量表评估牙科焦虑和恐惧的新型简短问卷。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Aug;16(4):244-254. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.4.244. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
2
Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of caregiver self-assessment questionnaire. caregiver 自我评估问卷土耳其语版的有效性和可靠性。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Nov;42(22):3250-3255. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2019.1587525. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
3
Anxiety and dental fear in a group of parenteral drug addicts.一组注射吸毒者中的焦虑和牙科恐惧
Scand J Dent Res. 1986 Jun;94(3):241-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1986.tb01759.x.
4
Reliability and Validity of the Dental Anxiety Question Used With Children.儿童用牙科焦虑问卷的信度和效度。
Anesth Prog. 2022 Sep 1;69(3):13-19. doi: 10.2344/anpr-69-01-04.
5
Additional psychometric data for the Spanish Modified Dental Anxiety Scale, and psychometric data for a Spanish version of the Revised Dental Beliefs Survey.《改良牙科焦虑量表西班牙语版的附加心理计量学数据,以及修订牙科信念调查西班牙语版的心理计量学数据》。
BMC Oral Health. 2010 May 13;10:12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-10-12.
6
Reliability and validity of the Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale for Arabic-speaking children: a cross-sectional study.阿拉伯语儿童牙科恐惧调查问卷子量表对说阿拉伯语儿童的信度和效度:一项横断面研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2016 Apr 14;16:49. doi: 10.1186/s12903-016-0205-0.
7
Psychometric Assessment of the Romanian Version of the Index of Dental Anxiety and Fear (IDAF-4C).罗马尼亚版牙科焦虑和恐惧指数(IDAF-4C)的心理测量评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 26;11(15):2129. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11152129.
8
[The Fear of Negative Evaluation scale (FNE): psychometric properties of the French version].[恐惧负面评价量表(FNE):法语版的心理测量特性]
Encephale. 2004 Nov-Dec;30(6):517-24. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(04)95465-6.
9
Development and validation of the Iranian version of the Children's Experiences of Dental Anxiety Measure (CEDAM).发展并验证儿童牙科焦虑量表(CEDAM)的伊朗版本。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Feb;10(1):e830. doi: 10.1002/cre2.830.
10
[Evaluation of Post-traumatic Stress Disorder: validation of a measure, the PCLS].[创伤后应激障碍的评估:一种测量工具——创伤后应激障碍检查表(PCLS)的效度验证]
Encephale. 2003 May-Jun;29(3 Pt 1):232-8.

本文引用的文献

1
What is the gold standard of the dental anxiety scale?牙科焦虑量表的金标准是什么?
J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2023 Aug;23(4):193-212. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2023.23.4.193. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
2
Dental anxiety and oral health-related quality of life before and after non-surgical periodontal treatment.牙周非手术治疗前后的牙科焦虑和口腔健康相关生活质量。
Clin Oral Investig. 2023 Sep;27(9):5459-5474. doi: 10.1007/s00784-023-05165-1. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
3
The complexity of dental anxiety and its association with oral health-related quality of life: An exploratory study.
牙科焦虑的复杂性及其与口腔健康相关生活质量的关系:一项探索性研究。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2023 Feb;131(1):e12907. doi: 10.1111/eos.12907. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
4
Evaluating the validity of the Index of Dental Anxiety and Fear (IDAF-4C) in adults with severe dental anxiety.评估牙科焦虑和恐惧指数(IDAF-4C)在严重牙科焦虑症成人中的有效性。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2020 Oct;128(5):423-428. doi: 10.1111/eos.12731. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
5
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
6
Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for fear of falling in older persons.老年人跌倒恐惧视觉模拟量表的信度和效度
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010 Nov;58(11):2228-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03105.x.
7
Anxiety sensitivity as a predictor of anxiety and pain related to third molar removal.焦虑敏感性作为与第三磨牙拔除相关的焦虑和疼痛的预测指标。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Nov;68(11):2723-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.06.174. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
8
Differences between trait fear and trait anxiety: implications for psychopathology.特质恐惧与特质焦虑的差异:对精神病理学的影响。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2011 Feb;31(1):122-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.08.004. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
9
Psychometric evaluation of a visual analog scale for the assessment of anxiety.用于评估焦虑的视觉模拟量表的心理计量学评估。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jun 8;8:57. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-57.
10
Relationship between preoperative anxiety and postoperative satisfaction in dental implant surgery with intravenous conscious sedation.在静脉注射镇静下进行牙种植手术时,术前焦虑与术后满意度的关系。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2010 Mar 1;15(2):e379-82. doi: 10.4317/medoral.15.e379.