Mathias Simone, Amerio-Cox Marius, Jackson Toni, Douce David, McCullough Bryan, Sage Ashley, Luke Peter, Crean Carol, Sears Patrick
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, U.K.
Waters Corporation, Stamford Avenue, Wilmslow SK9 4AX, U.K.
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2024 Oct 2;35(10):2480-2489. doi: 10.1021/jasms.4c00277. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
The utilization of ambient ionization (AI) techniques for mass spectrometry (MS) has significantly grown due to their ability to facilitate rapid and direct sample analysis with minimal sample preparation. This study investigates the performance of various AI techniques, including atmospheric solids analysis probe (ASAP), thermal desorption corona discharge (TDCD), direct analysis in real time (DART), and paper spray coupled to a Waters QDa mass spectrometer. The focus is on evaluating the linearity, repeatability, and limit of detection (LOD) of these techniques across a range of analytes, including amino acids, drugs, and explosives. The results show that each AI technique exhibits distinct advantages and limitations. ASAP and DART cover high concentration ranges, which may make them suitable for semiquantitative analysis. TDCD demonstrates exceptional linearity and repeatability for most analytes, while paper spray offers surprising LODs despite its complex setup (between 80 and 400 pg for most analytes). The comparison with electrospray ionization (ESI) as a standard method shows that ambient ionization techniques can achieve competitive LODs for various compounds such as PETN (80 pg ESI vs 100 pg ASAP), TNT (9 pg ESI vs 4 pg ASAP), and RDX (4 pg ESI vs 10 pg ASAP). This study underscores the importance of selecting the appropriate ambient ionization technique based on the specific analytical requirements. This comprehensive evaluation contributes valuable insights into the selection and optimization of AI techniques for diverse analytical applications.
由于能够以最少的样品制备实现快速直接的样品分析,大气压电离(AI)技术在质谱分析(MS)中的应用显著增加。本研究调查了各种AI技术的性能,包括常压固体分析探头(ASAP)、热解吸电晕放电(TDCD)、实时直接分析(DART)以及与沃特世QDa质谱仪联用的纸喷雾。重点是评估这些技术在一系列分析物(包括氨基酸、药物和爆炸物)中的线性、重复性和检测限(LOD)。结果表明,每种AI技术都有其独特的优点和局限性。ASAP和DART覆盖高浓度范围,这可能使其适用于半定量分析。TDCD对大多数分析物表现出出色的线性和重复性,而纸喷雾尽管设置复杂(大多数分析物的LOD在80至400 pg之间),但其检测限令人惊讶。与作为标准方法的电喷雾电离(ESI)的比较表明,大气压电离技术对于各种化合物(如季戊四醇四硝酸酯(PETN),ESI的LOD为80 pg,ASAP为100 pg;三硝基甲苯(TNT),ESI为9 pg,ASAP为4 pg;黑索今(RDX),ESI为4 pg,ASAP为10 pg)可以实现具有竞争力的检测限。本研究强调了根据具体分析要求选择合适的大气压电离技术的重要性。这一全面评估为不同分析应用中AI技术的选择和优化提供了有价值的见解。