Ridolfi Alessandro
Mental Health Department, Toscana Centro Local Health Unit, Florence.
Res Psychother. 2024 Aug 26;27(2):820. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2024.820.
In the field of clinical governance, the search for progressive high-quality health interventions is accompanied by the different health values they assume for the different stakeholders involved. With increasing frequency, the value of clinical psychology and psychotherapy interventions in the public service is also supported by their ability to be appropriate and measurable in terms of their effectiveness. As such, their expected future is one of systematic inclusion within increasingly defined and specific care pathways. The challenge that this evolution poses is complex from an epistemologicalmethodological point of view because it must include the various perspectives from which one looks at the nature of these interventions. Clinical appropriateness, as a meta-level variable, and accountability go beyond the simplistic/generic cost-benefit assessment of services and are proposed as a necessary conceptual framework for an adequate determination of outcomes.
在临床治理领域,对渐进式高质量健康干预措施的探索伴随着它们为不同利益相关者所呈现的不同健康价值观。临床心理学和心理治疗干预措施在公共服务中的价值也越来越多地体现在其有效性方面的适宜性和可衡量性上。因此,它们未来的预期是被系统地纳入日益明确和具体的护理路径。从认识论 - 方法论的角度来看,这种演变带来的挑战是复杂的,因为它必须涵盖人们看待这些干预措施本质的各种视角。临床适宜性作为一个元层次变量以及问责制超越了对服务简单/一般的成本效益评估,并被提议作为充分确定结果的必要概念框架。