Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang, South Korea.
Tech Coloproctol. 2024 Sep 2;28(1):117. doi: 10.1007/s10151-024-02992-6.
India ink has been a popular choice for a tattooing agent in preoperative endoscopic localization but often results in unfavorable effects. Subsequently, autologous blood tattooing has arisen as an alternative option. Due to the limited availability of comparative studies on the matter, we conducted a study to compare the perioperative outcomes associated with India ink tattooing versus autologous blood tattooing.
A total of 96 patients who underwent minimally invasive surgical procedures for left-sided colonic neoplasm following preoperative endoscopic localization were included in the study. These patients were categorized into two groups: 36 patients who received India ink tattooing and 60 patients who underwent autologous blood tattooing. The perioperative outcomes including procedure-related outcomes and postoperative outcomes were compared between the two groups.
There was no significant difference in visibility and spillage of tattooing agent between India ink group and autologous blood group. However, India ink group showed a higher incidence of post-tattooing fever, higher level of postoperative C-reactive protein level, longer time to first flatus, resumption of surgical soft diet, and duration of hospital stay, and a higher occurrence of postoperative complications including ileus and surgical site infection compared with the autologous blood group. In the multivariate analysis, India ink tattooing was significantly associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. In the subgroup analysis involving patients with intraperitoneal spillage, the autologous blood group demonstrated significantly favorable perioperative outcomes compared with India ink group.
Autologous blood tattooing demonstrated comparable visibility and enhanced safety, establishing it as a potential alternative to India ink for preoperative endoscopic localization.
印度墨水一直是术前内镜定位中纹身剂的热门选择,但往往会产生不利影响。随后,自体血纹身作为一种替代选择出现。由于关于这个问题的比较研究有限,我们进行了一项研究,比较印度墨水纹身和自体血纹身与围手术期结果的关系。
共有 96 例接受微创外科手术治疗左半结肠肿瘤的患者,这些患者在术前内镜定位后纳入研究。这些患者分为两组:36 例接受印度墨水纹身,60 例接受自体血纹身。比较两组患者的围手术期结果,包括手术相关结果和术后结果。
印度墨水组和自体血组在纹身剂的可见性和渗漏方面无显著差异。然而,印度墨水组术后发热、术后 C 反应蛋白水平较高、首次排气时间、恢复外科软食时间和住院时间较长,术后并发症(包括肠梗阻和手术部位感染)发生率较高。多因素分析显示,印度墨水纹身与术后并发症的发生显著相关。在涉及腹腔内渗漏的患者亚组分析中,自体血组的围手术期结果明显优于印度墨水组。
自体血纹身具有相似的可见性和更高的安全性,是术前内镜定位中印度墨水的潜在替代选择。