Bloomsburg University, Bloomsburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Med Philos. 2024 Nov 22;49(6):522-531. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhae033.
Simon Rippon, revising an earlier argument against kidney sales, now claims that offers involving the performance of invasive acts, when extended to people under pressure, constitute a kind of rights violation, Impermissibly Disrespectful Demands. Since offers involving kidney sales so qualify, Rippon finds prima facie reason to prohibit them. The present article levels four independent objections to Rippon's argument: the account of Impermissibly Disrespectful Demands implausibly condemns kidney donation as much as kidney sales; the normative importance of having autonomous veto control over bodily incursions does not plausibly underwrite a right to not be extended invasive offers under pressure; Impermissibly Disrespectful Demands can easily be transformed into innocuous offers; and the prohibition has greater welfare costs than Rippon acknowledges.
西蒙·里彭（Simon Rippon）修正了之前反对肾脏买卖的观点，现在声称，当涉及到有压力的人时，涉及侵入性行为的提议构成了一种侵犯权利的行为，即不可容忍的不尊重的要求。由于涉及肾脏买卖的提议符合这一定义，里彭初步有理由禁止这些提议。本文对里彭的论点提出了四点独立的反对意见：不可容忍的不尊重的要求的解释令人难以置信地谴责了肾脏捐赠和肾脏买卖；对身体入侵的自主否决控制的规范性重要性并不能合理地支持在压力下不被提出侵入性提议的权利；不可容忍的不尊重的要求很容易转化为无害的提议；以及这项禁令的福利成本比里彭承认的要高。
