Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 2;14(1):20408. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71611-z.
Maintaining patients' temperature during surgery is beneficial since hypothermia has been linked with perioperative complications. Laparoscopic surgery involves the insufflation of carbon dioxide (CO) into the peritoneal cavity and has become the standard in many surgical indications since it is associated with better and faster recovery. However, the use of cold and dry CO insufflation can lead to perioperative hypothermia. We aimed to assess the difference between intraperitoneal and core temperatures during laparoscopic surgery and evaluate the influence of duration and CO insufflation volume by fitting a mixed generalized additive model. In this prospective observational single-center cohort trial, we included patients aged over 17 with American Society of Anesthesiology risk scores I to III undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Anesthesia, ventilation, and analgesia followed standard protocols, while patients received active warming using blankets and warmed fluids. Temperature data, CO ventilation parameters, and intraabdominal pressure were collected. We recruited 51 patients. The core temperature was maintained above 36 °C and progressively raised toward 37 °C as pneumoperitoneum time passed. In contrast, the intraperitoneal temperature decreased, thus creating a widening difference from 0.4 [25th-75th percentile: 0.2-0.8] °C at the beginning to 2.3 [2.1-2.3] °C after 240 min. Pneumoperitoneum duration and CO insufflation volume significantly increased this temperature difference (P < 0.001 for both parameters). Core vs. intraperitoneal temperature difference increased linearly by 0.01 T °C per minute of pneumoperitoneum time up to 120 min and then 0.05 T °C per minute. Each insufflated liter per unit of time, i.e. every 10 min, increased the temperature difference by approximately 0.009 T °C. Our findings highlight the impact of pneumoperitoneum duration and CO insufflation volume on the difference between core and intraperitoneal temperatures. Implementing adequate external warming during laparoscopic surgery effectively maintains core temperature despite the use of dry and unwarmed CO gases, but peritoneal hypothermia remains a concern, suggesting the importance of further research into regional effects.Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04294758.
维持患者在手术期间的体温是有益的,因为低温与围手术期并发症有关。腹腔镜手术涉及向腹腔内注入二氧化碳(CO),并且由于与更快更好的恢复相关,已成为许多手术适应证的标准。然而,使用冷的和干燥的 CO 注入可能导致围手术期低温。我们旨在评估腹腔镜手术期间腹腔内和核心温度之间的差异,并通过拟合混合广义加性模型来评估手术时间和 CO 注入量的影响。在这项前瞻性观察性单中心队列研究中,我们纳入了年龄在 17 岁以上、美国麻醉医师协会风险评分 I 至 III 级的接受腹腔镜手术的患者。麻醉、通气和镇痛均遵循标准方案,同时患者接受毯子和加热液体的主动加热。收集温度数据、CO 通气参数和腹腔内压力。我们招募了 51 名患者。核心体温保持在 36°C 以上,并随着气腹时间的延长逐渐升高至 37°C。相比之下,腹腔内温度下降,因此从开始时的 0.4°C(25 百分位数-75 百分位数:0.2-0.8°C)到 240 分钟后扩大至 2.3°C(2.1-2.3°C)。气腹时间和 CO 注入量显著增加了这种温差(两个参数的 P 值均 < 0.001)。核心与腹腔内温度差以每分钟 0.01°C 的线性方式增加,气腹时间为 120 分钟,然后以每分钟 0.05°C 的方式增加。每单位时间注入的每升,即每 10 分钟,温差增加约 0.009°C。我们的研究结果强调了气腹时间和 CO 注入量对核心与腹腔内温度差异的影响。在腹腔镜手术期间实施足够的外部加热可有效维持核心体温,尽管使用干燥和未加热的 CO 气体,但腹膜低温仍然是一个关注点,这表明进一步研究局部区域效应的重要性。
Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT04294758。