MRC Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 2;21(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01647-x.
Encouraging alternatives to the car such as walking, cycling or public transport is a key cross-sector policy priority to promote population and planetary health. Individual travel choices are shaped by individual and environmental contexts, and changes in these contexts - triggered by key events - can translate to changes in travel mode. Understanding how and why these changes happen can help uncover more generalisable findings to inform future intervention research. This study aimed to identify the mechanisms and contexts facilitating changes in travel mode.
Prospective longitudinal qualitative cohort study utilising semi-structured interviews at baseline (in 2021), three- and six-month follow up. Participants were residents in a new town in Cambridgeshire, UK, where design principles to promote walking, cycling and public transport were used at the planning stage. At each interview, we followed a topic guide asking participants about previous and current travel patterns and future intentions. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. Data analysis used the framework approach based on realist evaluation principles identifying the context and mechanisms described by participants as leading to travel behaviour change.
We conducted 42 interviews with 16 participants and identified six mechanisms for changes in travel mode. These entailed increasing or reducing access, reliability and financial cost, improving convenience, increasing confidence and raising awareness. Participants described that these led to changes in travel mode in contexts where their existing travel mode had been disrupted, particularly in terms of reducing access or reliability or increasing cost, and where there were suitable alternative travel modes for their journey. Experiences of the new travel mode played a role in future travel intentions.
Applying realist evaluation principles to identify common mechanisms for changes in travel mode has the potential to inform future intervention strategies. Future interventions using mechanisms that reduce access to, reduce reliability of, or increase the financial cost of car use may facilitate modal shift to walking, cycling and public transport when implemented in contexts where alternative travel modes are available and acceptable.
鼓励步行、骑自行车或乘坐公共交通工具等替代汽车出行是促进人口和地球健康的跨部门政策重点。个人出行选择受到个人和环境背景的影响,而这些背景的变化——由关键事件引发——可以转化为出行方式的变化。了解这些变化是如何发生的以及为什么会发生,可以帮助揭示更具普遍性的发现,为未来的干预研究提供信息。本研究旨在确定促进出行方式改变的机制和背景。
前瞻性纵向定性队列研究,在基线(2021 年)、三个月和六个月随访时使用半结构式访谈。参与者是英国剑桥郡一个新城镇的居民,在规划阶段采用了促进步行、骑自行车和乘坐公共交通工具的设计原则。在每次访谈中,我们都遵循一个主题指南,询问参与者之前和当前的出行模式以及未来的意图。所有访谈均进行录音并转录。数据分析采用基于真实评估原则的框架方法,确定参与者描述的导致出行行为变化的背景和机制。
我们对 16 名参与者进行了 42 次访谈,确定了六种出行方式改变的机制。这些机制包括增加或减少可达性、可靠性和经济成本,提高便利性,增加信心和提高认识。参与者描述说,这些机制在他们现有的出行模式受到干扰的情况下,特别是在减少可达性或可靠性或增加成本的情况下,以及在有适合他们行程的替代出行模式的情况下,导致了出行方式的改变。对新出行方式的体验在未来的出行意图中发挥了作用。
应用真实评估原则来确定出行方式改变的常见机制有可能为未来的干预策略提供信息。在替代出行模式可用且可接受的情况下,未来使用减少汽车可达性、降低汽车可靠性或增加汽车经济成本的机制的干预措施,可能会促进向步行、骑自行车和乘坐公共交通工具的模式转变。