Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit and UKCRC Centre for Diet and Activity Research (CEDAR), Institute of Public Health, Cambridge, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Nov 16;10:703. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-703.
Modifying transport infrastructure to support active travel (walking and cycling) could help to increase population levels of physical activity. However, there is limited evidence for the effects of interventions in this field, and to the best of our knowledge no study has convincingly demonstrated an increase in physical activity directly attributable to this type of intervention. We have therefore taken the opportunity presented by a 'natural experiment' in Cambridgeshire, UK to establish a quasi-experimental study of the effects of a major transport infrastructural intervention on travel behaviour, physical activity and related wider health impacts.
The Commuting and Health in Cambridge study comprises three main elements: a cohort study of adults who travel to work in Cambridge, using repeated postal questionnaires and basic objective measurement of physical activity using accelerometers; in-depth quantitative studies of physical activity energy expenditure, travel and movement patterns and estimated carbon emissions using household travel diaries, combined heart rate and movement sensors and global positioning system (GPS) receivers; and a longitudinal qualitative interview study to elucidate participants' attitudes, experiences and practices and to understand how environmental and social factors interact to influence travel behaviour, for whom and in what circumstances. The impacts of a specific intervention - the opening of the Cambridgeshire Guided Busway - and of other changes in the physical environment will be examined using a controlled quasi-experimental design within the overall cohort dataset.
Addressing the unresolved research and policy questions in this area is not straightforward. The challenges include those of effectively combining different disciplinary perspectives on the research problems, developing common methodological ground in measurement and evaluation, implementing robust quantitative measurement of travel and physical activity behaviour in an unpredictable 'natural experiment' setting, defining exposure to the intervention, defining controls, and conceptualising an appropriate longitudinal analytical strategy.
改变交通基础设施以支持积极出行(步行和骑行)可以帮助提高人群的身体活动水平。然而,这一领域干预措施的效果证据有限,据我们所知,没有研究令人信服地证明这种类型的干预措施可直接增加身体活动。因此,我们利用英国剑桥郡的“自然实验”提供的机会,开展了一项关于重大交通基础设施干预措施对出行行为、身体活动和相关更广泛健康影响的准实验研究。
通勤与剑桥健康研究包括三个主要部分:一项针对在剑桥工作的成年人的队列研究,使用重复的邮寄问卷和基本的身体活动加速计客观测量;使用家庭出行日记、组合心率和运动传感器以及全球定位系统(GPS)接收器深入研究身体活动能量消耗、出行和运动模式以及估计的碳排放;以及一项纵向定性访谈研究,以阐明参与者的态度、经验和做法,并了解环境和社会因素如何相互作用影响出行行为、对谁以及在什么情况下产生影响。将使用整个队列数据集中的对照准实验设计来检查特定干预措施(剑桥引导巴士专用道的开通)以及物理环境中的其他变化的影响。
解决这一领域未解决的研究和政策问题并不简单。挑战包括如何有效地结合研究问题的不同学科视角,在测量和评估方面发展共同的方法基础,在不可预测的“自然实验”环境中对出行和身体活动行为进行稳健的定量测量,定义干预措施的暴露,定义对照,并概念化适当的纵向分析策略。