Krause L B, Shuster S
Br J Dermatol. 1985 Apr;112(4):447-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1985.tb02319.x.
The effects of the H I receptor antagonists astemizole and chlorpheniramine on dermographism were compared in a double-blind study in sixteen patients. Both drugs resulted in a parallel and significant depression of the dermographic force-response curve and an elevation of the weal-force threshold, but the changes were greater in the patients receiving astemizole (a maximal potency shift of 74% for astemizole and 37% for chlorpheniramine). Subjective itch (10 cm line) and frequency of dermographic episodes were also reduced more by astemizole than by chlorpheniramine. The effect of astemizole was greater at 4 weeks than at 2 weeks, whereas the effect of chlorpheniramine had decreased at 4 weeks. The effect of astemizole but not chlorpheniramine was still apparent 4 weeks after treatment had been stopped. Since the degree of residual dermographism was comparable despite great differences in histamine weal inhibition a vasoactive mechanism in addition to that mediated by histamine must be involved in dermographic urticaria.
在一项针对16名患者的双盲研究中,比较了组胺H1受体拮抗剂阿司咪唑和氯苯那敏对皮肤划痕症的影响。两种药物均导致皮肤划痕力反应曲线平行且显著下降,风团力阈值升高,但接受阿司咪唑治疗的患者变化更大(阿司咪唑的最大效能变化为74%,氯苯那敏为37%)。主观瘙痒(10厘米线)和皮肤划痕发作频率也比氯苯那敏更能被阿司咪唑降低。阿司咪唑在4周时的效果比2周时更大,而氯苯那敏在4周时效果已降低。停药4周后,阿司咪唑的效果仍很明显,而氯苯那敏则不然。尽管组胺风团抑制存在很大差异,但残余皮肤划痕症的程度相当,因此除组胺介导的机制外,皮肤划痕性荨麻疹肯定还涉及一种血管活性机制。