Suppr超能文献

结肠镜检查中肠道准备不充分的危险因素:一项全面的系统评价和Meta分析

Risk Factors for Inadequate Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Beran Azizullah, Aboursheid Tarek, Ali Adel Hajj, Albunni Hashem, Mohamed Mouhand F, Vargas Alejandra, Hadaki Nwal, Alsakarneh Saqr, Rex Douglas K, Guardiola John J

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Department of Internal Medicine, Ascension Saint Francis Hospital, Evanston, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 1;119(12):2389-2397. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003073. Epub 2024 Sep 3.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Inadequate bowel preparation (IBP) before colonoscopy remains a common problem. This meta-analysis aimed to assess the risk factors associated with IBP.

METHODS

We searched multiple databases for studies that assessed risk factors for IBP after adjustment and reported the data as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Meta-analyses were conducted using a random-effects model, and pooled adjusted odds ratios for risk factors reported in ≥ 3 studies were constructed.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-four studies with 358,257 participants were included. We analyzed 48 unique risk factors. Sociodemographic predictors of IBP were Medicaid insurance, obesity, current tobacco use, age ≥ 65 years, Black race, low education level, male sex, and unmarried status. Comorbidity-related predictors of IBP were any psychiatric disease, cirrhosis, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class ≥ 3, poor functional status, constipation, diabetes, previous abdominopelvic surgery, and hematochezia. Medication-related predictors of IBP were tricyclic antidepressants, antidepressants, opioids, nontricyclic antidepressants, and calcium channel blockers. Preparation/procedure-related predictors of IBP were brown liquid rectal effluent, any incomplete bowel preparation (BP) intake, lack of split-dose BP, increased BP-to-defecation interval, any nonadherence to dietary instructions, increased BP-to-colonoscopy interval, any BP intolerance, previous IBP, and inpatient status. Although afternoon colonoscopy was a predictor of IBP, subgroup analysis of prospective studies revealed no significant association.

DISCUSSION

Our meta-analysis focused on adjusted risk factors to provide precise estimates of the most important risk factors for IBP. Our findings could help develop a validated prediction model to identify high-risk patients for IBP, improve colonoscopy outcomes, reduce the need for repeat colonoscopies, and reduce associated healthcare costs.

摘要

引言

结肠镜检查前肠道准备不充分(IBP)仍是一个常见问题。本荟萃分析旨在评估与IBP相关的危险因素。

方法

我们在多个数据库中搜索了评估调整后IBP危险因素的研究,并将数据报告为具有95%置信区间的调整后比值比。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并构建了≥3项研究所报告危险因素的合并调整后比值比。

结果

纳入了154项研究,共358257名参与者。我们分析了48个独特的危险因素。IBP在社会人口统计学方面的预测因素包括医疗补助保险、肥胖、当前吸烟、年龄≥65岁、黑人种族、低教育水平、男性和未婚状态。IBP在合并症相关方面的预测因素包括任何精神疾病、肝硬化、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分级≥3、功能状态差、便秘、糖尿病、既往腹部盆腔手术和便血。IBP在药物相关方面的预测因素包括三环类抗抑郁药、抗抑郁药、阿片类药物、非三环类抗抑郁药和钙通道阻滞剂。IBP在准备/操作相关方面的预测因素包括棕色液体直肠流出物、任何不完全肠道准备(BP)摄入、缺乏分剂量BP、BP至排便间隔时间延长、任何不遵守饮食指导、BP至结肠镜检查间隔时间延长、任何BP不耐受、既往IBP和住院状态。虽然下午进行结肠镜检查是IBP的一个预测因素,但前瞻性研究的亚组分析未发现显著关联。

讨论

我们的荟萃分析聚焦于调整后的危险因素,以精确估计IBP最重要的危险因素。我们的研究结果有助于开发一个经过验证的预测模型,以识别IBP的高危患者,改善结肠镜检查结果,减少重复结肠镜检查的需求,并降低相关医疗成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验