• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

仅子女的中年健康:三个具有全国代表性的英国队列中按同胞规模划分的慢性病指标和生物标志物。

The midlife health of only children: chronic disease indicators and biomarkers by sibship size in three nationally representative UK cohorts.

机构信息

University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 14;53(5). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyae119.

DOI:10.1093/ije/dyae119
PMID:39226470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11371166/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite persistent concerns about only children's disadvantage relative to individuals with siblings, existing health-related evidence is inconsistent. Recent evidence from Nordic countries about only children having poorer health outcomes may not apply elsewhere because selection processes differ across contexts. We investigate the midlife health of only children in the UK where one-child families tend to be socio-economically advantaged relative to large families.

METHODS

Using the 1946, 1958 and 1970 British birth cohort studies, we examine various biomarkers and self-reported measures of chronic disease by sibship size when respondents are aged in their mid-40s, mid-50s and mid-60s. We estimate separate linear probability models for each cohort, age and outcome, adjusting for childhood and early adulthood circumstances.

RESULTS

We found no evidence of only children differing from those with one, two or three or more siblings, at any age, in any of the cohorts, on: heart problems, hypertension, high triglycerides, high glycated haemoglobin or high C-reactive protein. However, compared with only children, the probability for cancer (0.019, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.002, 0.035; age 46/1970) and poor general health (0.060, CI: 0.015, 0.127; age 55/1958; and 0.110, CI: 0.052, 0.168; age 63/1946) was higher among those with three or more siblings.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consistent pattern of only child health disadvantage for midlife chronic disease outcomes across ages or cohorts in the UK. Research should focus on better understanding how sibship size differentials are contingent on context.

摘要

背景

尽管人们一直担心独生子女性别相对于有兄弟姐妹的人存在劣势,但现有的健康相关证据并不一致。北欧国家最近的证据表明,独生子女性健康状况较差,但这些证据可能不适用于其他地区,因为不同的环境下存在不同的选择过程。我们在英国调查了独生子女性健康状况,在英国,相对于大家庭,一孩家庭往往在社会经济方面具有优势。

方法

我们使用了 1946 年、1958 年和 1970 年的英国出生队列研究,当受访者年龄在 40 多岁、50 多岁和 60 多岁时,我们根据兄弟姐妹的数量检查了各种生物标志物和慢性疾病的自我报告测量结果。我们为每个队列、年龄和结果分别估计了线性概率模型,并调整了童年和成年早期的情况。

结果

我们发现,在任何年龄、任何队列中,独生子女性别与那些有一个、两个或三个或更多兄弟姐妹的人在心脏问题、高血压、高甘油三酯、高糖化血红蛋白或高 C 反应蛋白方面没有差异。然而,与独生子相比,有三个或更多兄弟姐妹的人患癌症(0.019,95%置信区间 [CI]:0.002,0.035;年龄 46/1970)和总体健康状况较差(0.060,CI:0.015,0.127;年龄 55/1958;0.110,CI:0.052,0.168;年龄 63/1946)的可能性更高。

结论

在英国,不同年龄或队列的独生子女性别在中年慢性疾病结局方面没有一致的健康劣势模式。研究应侧重于更好地了解兄弟姐妹数量的差异如何取决于背景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b37/11371166/725da43ba596/dyae119f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b37/11371166/725da43ba596/dyae119f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7b37/11371166/725da43ba596/dyae119f1.jpg

相似文献

1
The midlife health of only children: chronic disease indicators and biomarkers by sibship size in three nationally representative UK cohorts.仅子女的中年健康:三个具有全国代表性的英国队列中按同胞规模划分的慢性病指标和生物标志物。
Int J Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 14;53(5). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyae119.
2
Sibling group size and BMI over the life course: Evidence from four British cohort studies.同胞群体规模与一生的体重指数:来自四项英国队列研究的证据。
Adv Life Course Res. 2022 Sep;53:100493. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100493. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
3
Cohort Trends in the Association Between Sibship Size and Educational Attainment in 26 Low-Fertility Countries.队列研究:26 个低生育率国家中兄弟姐妹数量与教育程度的关联趋势
Demography. 2020 Jun;57(3):1035-1062. doi: 10.1007/s13524-020-00885-5.
4
Siblings and childhood mental health: evidence for a later-born advantage.兄弟姐妹和儿童心理健康:后生优势的证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(12):2061-2069. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.03.009. Epub 2010 Mar 23.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Association of Early-Life Mental Health With Biomarkers in Midlife and Premature Mortality: Evidence From the 1958 British Birth Cohort.早年心理健康与中年生物标志物及过早死亡的关联:来自1958年英国出生队列的证据。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 1;78(1):38-46. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.2893.
7
Midlife health in Britain and the United States: a comparison of two nationally representative cohorts.英国和美国的中年健康状况:两个具有全国代表性队列的比较。
Int J Epidemiol. 2024 Aug 14;53(5). doi: 10.1093/ije/dyae127.
8
Long-term psychological distress trajectories and the COVID-19 pandemic in three British birth cohorts: A multi-cohort study.长期心理困扰轨迹与三个人群队列中的 COVID-19 大流行:一项多人群队列研究。
PLoS Med. 2023 Apr 4;20(4):e1004145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004145. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
Do early life cognitive ability and self-regulation skills explain socio-economic inequalities in academic achievement? An effect decomposition analysis in UK and Australian cohorts.早期生活认知能力和自我调节技能能否解释学业成就中的社会经济不平等?对英国和澳大利亚队列的效应分解分析。
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Sep;165:108-118. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.016. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
10
Exploring the role of early-life circumstances, abilities and achievements on well-being at age 50 years: evidence from the 1958 British birth cohort study.探讨早年生活环境、能力和成就对 50 岁时幸福感的影响:来自 1958 年英国出生队列研究的证据。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 20;10(2):e031416. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031416.

本文引用的文献

1
Is only-child status associated with a higher blood pressure in adolescence? An observational study.独生子女身份是否与青少年时期的高血压有关?一项观察性研究。
Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Mar;182(3):1377-1384. doi: 10.1007/s00431-022-04800-5. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
2
Sibling group size and BMI over the life course: Evidence from four British cohort studies.同胞群体规模与一生的体重指数:来自四项英国队列研究的证据。
Adv Life Course Res. 2022 Sep;53:100493. doi: 10.1016/j.alcr.2022.100493. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
3
Health outcomes of only children across the life course: An investigation using Swedish register data.
独生子女一生的健康状况:一项基于瑞典登记数据的调查。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2023 Mar;77(1):71-90. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2021.2020886. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
Association between Number of Siblings and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Childhood and in Adulthood: The Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study.兄弟姐妹数量与儿童和成年期心血管危险因素的关系:芬兰年轻人心血管风险研究。
J Pediatr. 2021 Oct;237:87-95.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.05.058. Epub 2021 Jun 1.
5
Sibling rank and sibling number in relation to cardiovascular disease and mortality risk: a nationwide cohort study.同胞排行和同胞数量与心血管疾病和死亡风险的关系:一项全国性队列研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 25;11(6):e042881. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042881.
6
Missing at random assumption made more plausible: evidence from the 1958 British birth cohort.随机缺失假设更合理:来自 1958 年英国出生队列的证据。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;136:44-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.019. Epub 2021 Feb 27.
7
Fewer Siblings, More Wealth? Sibship Size and Wealth Attainment.兄弟姐妹越少,财富越多?家庭规模与财富积累
Eur J Popul. 2019 Jan 17;35(5):959-986. doi: 10.1007/s10680-018-09512-x. eCollection 2019 Dec.
8
Birth order and number of siblings and their association with overweight and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.出生顺序和兄弟姐妹数量及其与超重和肥胖的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutr Rev. 2018 Feb 1;76(2):117-124. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nux060.
9
The effect of number of siblings on adult mortality: Evidence from Swedish registers for cohorts born between 1938 and 1972.兄弟姐妹数量对成人死亡率的影响:来自瑞典1938年至1972年出生队列登记册的证据。
Popul Stud (Camb). 2017 Mar;71(1):43-63. doi: 10.1080/00324728.2016.1260755. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
10
25 by 25: Achieving Global Reduction in Cardiovascular Mortality.25×25:实现全球心血管疾病死亡率降低
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2016 Jan;18(1):10. doi: 10.1007/s11886-015-0679-4.