• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿创伤中心骨折复位中鼻内芬太尼与吗啡的比较

Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Morphine in Fracture Reduction in a Pediatric Trauma Center.

作者信息

Bisso Raoul, Tielli Alexandra, Lopes Anne-Aurelie

机构信息

From the Emergency Department, Paris Saint-Joseph Hospital Group (Bisso), the Paediatric Emergency Department, AP-HP, Robert Debre Hospital University, Paris University (Tielli), and the Paediatric Emergency Department, AP-HP, Necker-Enfants-Malades University Hospital, Paris University, Paris, France (Lopes).

出版信息

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Dec 15;32(24):e1280-e1288. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00231. Epub 2024 Aug 30.

DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00231
PMID:39226541
Abstract

PURPOSE

Pain management in orthopaedic manipulation in the emergency department (ED) is crucial to decrease fracture reduction performed in the operating room. This study compared intranasal fentanyl (INF) with oral morphine in time of care and effectiveness on pain during the reduction of bone fractures in a pediatric trauma center.

METHODS

A before-and-after INF implementation study was conducted in a pediatric ED with a trauma center on children with a confirmed displaced closed fracture on radiographs with reduction and casting performed in the ED. The time of care, time for sufficient analgesia, effectiveness on pain, and tolerance were compared between both analgesics in 3 consecutive phases.

RESULTS

77 children were included: 31 children received oral morphine and 46 INF. The time of care was shorter in the INF group (150 [111 to 193] minutes versus 215 [155 to 240], P = 0.01) as the time for sufficient analgesia (10 [9 to 13] minutes versus 80 [53 to 119], P < 0.001) with a higher pain reduction after a dose of INF (3 [0 to 4] versus 6 [3 to 7], P < 0.001) and less dose requirement ( P = 0.002). Although pain scores were similar at arrival in both groups ( P = 0.15), the pain was significantly lower before and during the procedure in the INF group and equivalent after the procedure (2 [0 to 4] versus 3 [0 to 5], P = 0.02, 3 [1 to 5] versus 7 [3 to 9], P < 0.001, and 1 [0 to 2] in both groups, P = 0.87, respectively). Keeping pain levels low during the procedure in the INF group allowed the extension to lower limb fracture reductions ( P = 0.04). No serious adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

INF reduces the time to obtain sufficient analgesia and time of care, with good effectiveness maintained during the procedure in fracture reduction, allowing the extension to lower limb fractures. Thus, this rapid and efficient analgesia facilitates orthopaedic care in the pediatric ED that would otherwise require to be reduced in the operating room under general anesthesia.

摘要

目的

急诊科骨科手法操作中的疼痛管理对于减少在手术室进行的骨折复位至关重要。本研究在一家儿科创伤中心比较了鼻内给予芬太尼(INF)和口服吗啡在骨折复位时的护理时间及对疼痛的缓解效果。

方法

在一家设有创伤中心的儿科急诊科开展了一项INF应用前后的研究,研究对象为经X线片确诊为闭合性移位骨折且在急诊科进行复位和石膏固定的儿童。在连续3个阶段比较了两种镇痛药的护理时间、达到充分镇痛的时间、对疼痛的缓解效果及耐受性。

结果

共纳入77名儿童:31名儿童接受口服吗啡,46名接受INF。INF组的护理时间更短(150[111至193]分钟对215[155至240]分钟,P = 0.01),达到充分镇痛的时间也更短(10[9至13]分钟对80[53至119]分钟,P < 0.001),一剂INF后的疼痛缓解程度更高(3[0至4]对6[3至7],P < 0.001)且剂量需求更少(P = 0.002)。尽管两组到达时的疼痛评分相似(P = 0.15),但INF组在操作前和操作期间的疼痛明显更低,操作后相当(分别为2[0至4]对3[0至5],P = 0.02;3[1至5]对7[3至9],P < 0.001;两组均为1[0至2],P = 0.87)。INF组在操作期间将疼痛水平维持在较低水平,使得下肢骨折复位的范围得以扩大(P = 0.04)。未报告严重不良事件。

结论

INF可缩短获得充分镇痛的时间和护理时间,在骨折复位操作过程中保持良好的效果,使下肢骨折复位范围得以扩大。因此,这种快速有效的镇痛方法有助于儿科急诊科的骨科护理,否则这些操作需要在全身麻醉下于手术室进行。

相似文献

1
Intranasal Fentanyl Versus Morphine in Fracture Reduction in a Pediatric Trauma Center.小儿创伤中心骨折复位中鼻内芬太尼与吗啡的比较
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2024 Dec 15;32(24):e1280-e1288. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00231. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
2
A randomized controlled trial comparing intranasal fentanyl to intravenous morphine for managing acute pain in children in the emergency department.一项比较鼻内给予芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡用于急诊科儿童急性疼痛管理的随机对照试验。
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Mar;49(3):335-40. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Oct 25.
3
Comparative review of the clinical use of intranasal fentanyl versus morphine in a paediatric emergency department.鼻内芬太尼与吗啡在儿科急诊临床应用的比较评价。
Emerg Med Australas. 2008 Dec;20(6):515-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01138.x.
4
Evaluation of an oral analgesia protocol for upper-limb fracture reduction in the paediatric emergency department: Prospective study of 101 patients.儿科急诊上肢骨折复位口服镇痛方案的评估:101 例患者的前瞻性研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Oct;105(6):1199-1204. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
5
Intranasal fentanyl for the management of acute pain in children.鼻内给予芬太尼用于儿童急性疼痛的管理。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 10;2014(10):CD009942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009942.pub2.
6
Pediatric emergency department triage-based pain guideline utilizing intranasal fentanyl: Effect of implementation.儿科急诊分诊为基础的疼痛指南利用鼻腔芬太尼:实施效果。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Sep;36(9):1603-1607. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.042. Epub 2018 Jan 16.
7
Expedited Delivery of Pain Medication for Long-Bone Fractures Using an Intranasal Fentanyl Clinical Pathway.使用鼻内芬太尼临床路径加速长骨骨折疼痛药物的递送。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2015 Aug;31(8):560-3. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000435.
8
Evaluating the Implementation Barriers of an Intranasal Fentanyl Pain Pathway for Pediatric Long-Bone Fractures.评估小儿长骨骨折鼻内芬太尼疼痛治疗路径的实施障碍。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2018 Jul;34(7):473-478. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000001375.
9
Intranasal fentanyl is an equivalent analgesic to oral morphine in paediatric burns patients for dressing changes: a randomised double blind crossover study.对于小儿烧伤患者换药,鼻内给予芬太尼与口服吗啡镇痛效果相当:一项随机双盲交叉研究。
Burns. 2005 Nov;31(7):831-7. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2005.05.001. Epub 2005 Jul 6.
10
IF IM in a crisis: Intranasal fentanyl versus intravenous morphine in adult vaso-occlusive crisis.如果我处于危机中:成人血管闭塞性危机中鼻内芬太尼与静脉注射吗啡的比较。
Am J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb;64:86-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2022.11.026. Epub 2022 Nov 21.