Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.
Orbis International Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Sep 3;18(9):e0012034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012034. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Poor surgical outcomes remain a problem in trachoma-endemic countries working to reach elimination thresholds. Methods to improve outcomes could positively impact programmatic success.
This parallel, three-armed clinical trial conducted in Ethiopia randomized individuals with previously unoperated trachomatous trichiasis (TT) to receive surgery utilizing one of three approaches: bilamellar tarsal rotation with a 3 mm incision height (BLTR-3), BLTR with 5 mm incision height (BLTR-5) and posterior lamellar tarsal rotation (PLTR). We followed participants for one year. The primary outcome was post-operative trichiasis (PTT). Secondary outcomes were eyelid contour abnormalities (ECA) and pyogenic granulomata.
We randomized and operated on 4,914 individuals with previously unoperated TT (6,940 eyes). Primary analyses include 6,815 eyes with follow-up. Overall, 1,149 (16.9%) eyes developed PTT. The risk difference for PTT was minimal comparing BLTR-3 and PLTR (adjusted risk difference [aRD] 1.8% (98.3%CI: -0.5-4.2%)), but significantly higher for BLTR-5 surgeries compared to BLTR-3 (aRD: 6.7% (3.9-9.4%)) and PLTR (aRD: 8.6% (5.9-11.3%)). BLTR-5 had the lowest ECA (6.1% versus 9.6% BLTR-3, 11.2% PLTR) and granuloma rates (5.2% versus 6.5% BLTR-3 and 7.5% PLTR). One eyelid operated with PLTR experienced an eyelid margin division; four BLTR-3 and eight BLTR-5 eyelids experienced excessive bleeding.
We do not recommend modifying the BLTR incision height of 3 mm. Overall, we did not find a significant difference in PTT between BLTR-3 and PLTR in terms of PTT or ECA.
Registration number: NCT03100747; ClinicalTrials.gov Full study protocol available at (https://doi.org/10.15139/S3/QHZXWD).
在努力达到消除标准的沙眼流行国家,手术效果不佳仍然是一个问题。改善手术效果的方法可能会对项目的成功产生积极影响。
本项在埃塞俄比亚进行的平行、三臂临床试验,将未经手术的原发性沙眼性倒睫(TT)患者随机分为三组,分别接受以下三种手术方式:双层睑板旋转术(BLTR),切口高度 3mm(BLTR-3)、BLTR,切口高度 5mm(BLTR-5)和后板层睑板旋转术(PLTR)。我们对参与者进行了为期一年的随访。主要结局是术后倒睫(PTT)。次要结局是眼睑轮廓异常(ECA)和脓性肉芽肿。
我们对 4914 例未经手术的原发性 TT 患者(6940 只眼)进行了随机分组和手术。主要分析纳入了 6815 只眼的随访数据。总体而言,有 1149 只(16.9%)眼发生了 PTT。BLTR-3 和 PLTR 相比,PTT 的风险差异极小(调整后的风险差异[ARD]1.8%(98.3%CI:-0.5-4.2%)),但 BLTR-5 与 BLTR-3 (ARD:6.7%(3.9-9.4%))和 PLTR(ARD:8.6%(5.9-11.3%))相比,PTT 的风险差异显著更高。BLTR-5 的 ECA(6.1%比 BLTR-3 的 9.6%,PLTR 的 11.2%)和肉芽肿发生率(5.2%比 BLTR-3 的 6.5%和 PLTR 的 7.5%)最低。1 只接受 PLTR 手术的眼睑发生了眼睑缘分离,4 只 BLTR-3 和 8 只 BLTR-5 眼睑发生了过度出血。
我们不建议修改 BLTR 切口高度 3mm。总体而言,BLTR-3 和 PLTR 在 PTT 或 ECA 方面,我们没有发现 PTT 之间有显著差异。
注册号:NCT03100747;临床试验.gov 完整研究方案可在(https://doi.org/10.15139/S3/QHZXWD)获取。