Suppr超能文献

改良切口高度和手术方式对倒睫手术效果的影响:最大化倒睫手术成功率(MTSS)随机试验结果。

The impact of modified incision height and surgical procedure on trichiasis surgery outcomes: Results of the maximizing trichiasis surgery success (MTSS) randomized trial.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States of America.

Orbis International Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2024 Sep 3;18(9):e0012034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0012034. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Poor surgical outcomes remain a problem in trachoma-endemic countries working to reach elimination thresholds. Methods to improve outcomes could positively impact programmatic success.

METHODS

This parallel, three-armed clinical trial conducted in Ethiopia randomized individuals with previously unoperated trachomatous trichiasis (TT) to receive surgery utilizing one of three approaches: bilamellar tarsal rotation with a 3 mm incision height (BLTR-3), BLTR with 5 mm incision height (BLTR-5) and posterior lamellar tarsal rotation (PLTR). We followed participants for one year. The primary outcome was post-operative trichiasis (PTT). Secondary outcomes were eyelid contour abnormalities (ECA) and pyogenic granulomata.

FINDINGS

We randomized and operated on 4,914 individuals with previously unoperated TT (6,940 eyes). Primary analyses include 6,815 eyes with follow-up. Overall, 1,149 (16.9%) eyes developed PTT. The risk difference for PTT was minimal comparing BLTR-3 and PLTR (adjusted risk difference [aRD] 1.8% (98.3%CI: -0.5-4.2%)), but significantly higher for BLTR-5 surgeries compared to BLTR-3 (aRD: 6.7% (3.9-9.4%)) and PLTR (aRD: 8.6% (5.9-11.3%)). BLTR-5 had the lowest ECA (6.1% versus 9.6% BLTR-3, 11.2% PLTR) and granuloma rates (5.2% versus 6.5% BLTR-3 and 7.5% PLTR). One eyelid operated with PLTR experienced an eyelid margin division; four BLTR-3 and eight BLTR-5 eyelids experienced excessive bleeding.

INTERPRETATION

We do not recommend modifying the BLTR incision height of 3 mm. Overall, we did not find a significant difference in PTT between BLTR-3 and PLTR in terms of PTT or ECA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration number: NCT03100747; ClinicalTrials.gov Full study protocol available at (https://doi.org/10.15139/S3/QHZXWD).

摘要

背景

在努力达到消除标准的沙眼流行国家,手术效果不佳仍然是一个问题。改善手术效果的方法可能会对项目的成功产生积极影响。

方法

本项在埃塞俄比亚进行的平行、三臂临床试验,将未经手术的原发性沙眼性倒睫(TT)患者随机分为三组,分别接受以下三种手术方式:双层睑板旋转术(BLTR),切口高度 3mm(BLTR-3)、BLTR,切口高度 5mm(BLTR-5)和后板层睑板旋转术(PLTR)。我们对参与者进行了为期一年的随访。主要结局是术后倒睫(PTT)。次要结局是眼睑轮廓异常(ECA)和脓性肉芽肿。

结果

我们对 4914 例未经手术的原发性 TT 患者(6940 只眼)进行了随机分组和手术。主要分析纳入了 6815 只眼的随访数据。总体而言,有 1149 只(16.9%)眼发生了 PTT。BLTR-3 和 PLTR 相比,PTT 的风险差异极小(调整后的风险差异[ARD]1.8%(98.3%CI:-0.5-4.2%)),但 BLTR-5 与 BLTR-3 (ARD:6.7%(3.9-9.4%))和 PLTR(ARD:8.6%(5.9-11.3%))相比,PTT 的风险差异显著更高。BLTR-5 的 ECA(6.1%比 BLTR-3 的 9.6%,PLTR 的 11.2%)和肉芽肿发生率(5.2%比 BLTR-3 的 6.5%和 PLTR 的 7.5%)最低。1 只接受 PLTR 手术的眼睑发生了眼睑缘分离,4 只 BLTR-3 和 8 只 BLTR-5 眼睑发生了过度出血。

解释

我们不建议修改 BLTR 切口高度 3mm。总体而言,BLTR-3 和 PLTR 在 PTT 或 ECA 方面,我们没有发现 PTT 之间有显著差异。

试验注册

注册号:NCT03100747;临床试验.gov 完整研究方案可在(https://doi.org/10.15139/S3/QHZXWD)获取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9240/11398687/4a4124bf4b70/pntd.0012034.g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验