Institute for Health and Sport (IHES), Victoria University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Nat Commun. 2024 Sep 3;15(1):7677. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50632-2.
Analyses of mitochondrial adaptations in human skeletal muscle have mostly used whole-muscle samples, where results may be confounded by the presence of a mixture of type I and II muscle fibres. Using our adapted mass spectrometry-based proteomics workflow, we provide insights into fibre-specific mitochondrial differences in the human skeletal muscle of men before and after training. Our findings challenge previous conclusions regarding the extent of fibre-type-specific remodelling of the mitochondrial proteome and suggest that most baseline differences in mitochondrial protein abundances between fibre types reported by us, and others, might be due to differences in total mitochondrial content or a consequence of adaptations to habitual physical activity (or inactivity). Most training-induced changes in different mitochondrial functional groups, in both fibre types, were no longer significant in our study when normalised to changes in markers of mitochondrial content.
对人类骨骼肌中线粒体适应性的分析主要使用整块肌肉样本,但结果可能因存在混合的 I 型和 II 型肌纤维而受到混淆。利用我们改良的基于质谱的蛋白质组学工作流程,我们深入了解了男性训练前后骨骼肌中纤维特异性线粒体差异。我们的研究结果挑战了先前关于线粒体蛋白质组纤维型特异性重塑程度的结论,并表明我们和其他人之前报告的两种纤维类型之间线粒体蛋白丰度的大多数基线差异可能是由于总线粒体含量的差异或对习惯性体力活动(或不活动)的适应的结果。当按线粒体含量标志物的变化进行归一化后,大多数不同线粒体功能群在两种纤维类型中的训练诱导变化在我们的研究中不再显著。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-1-5
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024-4-8
Nat Commun. 2025-2-19
Nucleic Acids Res. 2021-1-8
Mitochondrion. 2021-5
Nat Metab. 2020-9