• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响糖尿病前期患者生存的因素:Cox 比例风险模型与随机生存森林方法的比较。

Factors affecting the survival of prediabetic patients: comparison of Cox proportional hazards model and random survival forest method.

机构信息

Social Determinants in Health Promotion Research Center, Hormozgan Health Institute, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.

Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02648-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02648-3
PMID:39227824
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11373449/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The worldwide prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults is experiencing a rapid increase. This study aimed to identify the factors affecting the survival of prediabetic patients using a comparison of the Cox proportional hazards model (CPH) and the Random survival forest (RSF).

METHOD

This prospective cohort study was performed on 746 prediabetics in southwest Iran. The demographic, lifestyle, and clinical data of the participants were recorded. The CPH and RSF models were used to determine the patients' survival. Furthermore, the concordance index (C-index) and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were employed to compare the performance of the Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model and the random survival forest (RSF) model.

RESULTS

The 5-year cumulative T2DM incidence was 12.73%. Based on the results of the CPH model, NAFLD (HR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.06, 2.85), FBS (HR = 1.008, 95% CI: 1.005, 1.012) and increased abdominal fat (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.04) were directly associated with diabetes occurrence in prediabetic patients. The RSF model suggests that factors including FBS, waist circumference, depression, NAFLD, afternoon sleep, and female gender are the most important variables that predict diabetes. The C-index indicated that the RSF model has a higher percentage of agreement than the CPH model, and in the weighted Brier Score index, the RSF model had less error than the Kaplan-Meier and CPH model.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that the incidence of diabetes was alarmingly high in Iran. The results suggested that several demographic and clinical factors are associated with diabetes occurrence in prediabetic patients. The high-risk population needs special measures for screening and care programs.

摘要

背景

全球成年人 2 型糖尿病的患病率正在迅速增加。本研究旨在通过比较 Cox 比例风险模型(CPH)和随机生存森林(RSF)来确定影响糖尿病前期患者生存的因素。

方法

本前瞻性队列研究在伊朗西南部对 746 名糖尿病前期患者进行了研究。记录了参与者的人口统计学、生活方式和临床数据。使用 Cox 比例风险(CPH)模型和随机生存森林(RSF)模型来确定患者的生存情况。此外,还使用一致性指数(C 指数)和时间依赖性接受者操作特征(ROC)曲线来比较 Cox 比例风险(CPH)模型和随机生存森林(RSF)模型的性能。

结果

5 年累积 T2DM 发生率为 12.73%。基于 CPH 模型的结果,NAFLD(HR=1.74,95%CI:1.06,2.85)、FBS(HR=1.008,95%CI:1.005,1.012)和腹部脂肪增加(HR=1.02,95%CI:1.01,1.04)与糖尿病前期患者的糖尿病发生直接相关。RSF 模型表明,FBS、腰围、抑郁、NAFLD、下午睡眠和女性等因素是预测糖尿病的最重要变量。C 指数表明,RSF 模型的一致性百分比高于 CPH 模型,在加权 Brier 评分指数中,RSF 模型的错误率低于 Kaplan-Meier 和 CPH 模型。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,伊朗的糖尿病发病率非常高。研究结果表明,一些人口统计学和临床因素与糖尿病前期患者的糖尿病发生有关。高危人群需要采取特殊的筛查和护理计划。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/00b218a767a2/12911_2024_2648_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/3af464be0b32/12911_2024_2648_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/c91b18e7cf83/12911_2024_2648_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/a0b5949f1475/12911_2024_2648_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/279b0866b51d/12911_2024_2648_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/1952332160aa/12911_2024_2648_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/00b218a767a2/12911_2024_2648_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/3af464be0b32/12911_2024_2648_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/c91b18e7cf83/12911_2024_2648_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/a0b5949f1475/12911_2024_2648_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/279b0866b51d/12911_2024_2648_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/1952332160aa/12911_2024_2648_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/024e/11373449/00b218a767a2/12911_2024_2648_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors affecting the survival of prediabetic patients: comparison of Cox proportional hazards model and random survival forest method.影响糖尿病前期患者生存的因素:Cox 比例风险模型与随机生存森林方法的比较。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02648-3.
2
Risk factors associated with major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events following percutaneous coronary intervention: a 10-year follow-up comparing random survival forest and Cox proportional-hazards model.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要不良心脑血管事件的相关危险因素:一项比较随机生存森林模型和Cox比例风险模型的10年随访研究
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Jan 18;21(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01834-1.
3
A Comparison Study of Machine Learning (Random Survival Forest) and Classic Statistic (Cox Proportional Hazards) for Predicting Progression in High-Grade Glioma after Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.机器学习(随机生存森林)与经典统计学(Cox比例风险模型)预测质子和碳离子放疗后高级别胶质瘤进展的比较研究
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 30;10:551420. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.551420. eCollection 2020.
4
The development of a prediction model based on random survival forest for the prognosis of non- Hodgkin lymphoma: A prospective cohort study in China.基于随机生存森林的非霍奇金淋巴瘤预后预测模型的构建:一项中国的前瞻性队列研究。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 19;10(12):e32788. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32788. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
5
Prognosis prediction of extremity and trunk wall soft-tissue sarcomas treated with surgical resection with radiomic analysis based on random survival forest.基于随机生存森林的放射组学分析预测手术切除治疗肢体和躯干壁软组织肉瘤的预后。
Updates Surg. 2022 Feb;74(1):355-365. doi: 10.1007/s13304-021-01074-8. Epub 2021 May 18.
6
Random Survival Forest in practice: a method for modelling complex metabolomics data in time to event analysis.实践中的随机生存森林:一种在时间-事件分析中对复杂代谢组学数据进行建模的方法。
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Oct;45(5):1406-1420. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw145. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
7
Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease predicts type 2 diabetes mellitus, but not prediabetes, in Xi'an, China: a five-year cohort study.中国西安的一项为期五年的队列研究:非酒精性脂肪性肝病可预测2型糖尿病,但不能预测糖尿病前期。
Liver Int. 2015 Nov;35(11):2401-7. doi: 10.1111/liv.12851. Epub 2015 May 5.
8
Resting heart rate and the risk of incident type 2 diabetes mellitus among non-diabetic and prediabetic Iranian adults: Tehran lipid and glucose study.静息心率与伊朗非糖尿病和糖尿病前期成年人 2 型糖尿病发病风险的关系:德黑兰血脂和血糖研究。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 27;23(1):2112. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17022-7.
9
A prediction model based on random survival forest analysis of the overall survival of elderly female papillary thyroid carcinoma patients: a SEER-based study.基于随机生存森林分析的老年女性甲状腺乳头状癌患者总生存预测模型:一项基于 SEER 的研究。
Endocrine. 2024 Sep;85(3):1252-1260. doi: 10.1007/s12020-024-03797-1. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
10
A comparison of machine learning models and Cox proportional hazards models regarding their ability to predict the risk of gastrointestinal cancer based on metabolic syndrome and its components.基于代谢综合征及其组成部分,对机器学习模型和Cox比例风险模型预测胃肠道癌症风险的能力进行比较。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 2;13:1049787. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1049787. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

1
The Concordance Index decomposition: A measure for a deeper understanding of survival prediction models.一致性指数分解:一种更深入理解生存预测模型的方法。
Artif Intell Med. 2024 Feb;148:102781. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102781. Epub 2024 Jan 17.
2
The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression Among Individuals with Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.糖尿病患者抑郁症认知行为疗法的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Curr Diab Rep. 2023 Sep;23(9):245-252. doi: 10.1007/s11892-023-01517-z. Epub 2023 Jun 17.
3
A comparison of machine learning models and Cox proportional hazards models regarding their ability to predict the risk of gastrointestinal cancer based on metabolic syndrome and its components.
基于代谢综合征及其组成部分,对机器学习模型和Cox比例风险模型预测胃肠道癌症风险的能力进行比较。
Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 2;13:1049787. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1049787. eCollection 2023.
4
Machine learning for optimized individual survival prediction in resectable upper gastrointestinal cancer.机器学习在可切除上消化道癌症个体化生存预测中的应用。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 May;149(5):1691-1702. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04063-5. Epub 2022 May 26.
5
Random forest approach for determining risk prediction and predictive factors of type 2 diabetes: large-scale health check-up data in Japan.用于确定2型糖尿病风险预测及预测因素的随机森林方法:日本大规模健康检查数据
BMJ Nutr Prev Health. 2021 Mar 11;4(1):140-148. doi: 10.1136/bmjnph-2020-000200. eCollection 2021.
6
A comparison of time to event analysis methods, using weight status and breast cancer as a case study.使用体重状况和乳腺癌作为案例研究比较生存时间分析方法。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jul 7;11(1):14058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92944-z.
7
Beyond weight loss: current perspectives on the impact of calorie restriction on healthspan and lifespan.超越减肥:限制热量摄入对健康寿命和寿命影响的最新观点。
Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2021 May;16(3):95-108. doi: 10.1080/17446651.2021.1922077. Epub 2021 May 7.
8
Exploratory study on classification of diabetes mellitus through a combined Random Forest Classifier.基于随机森林分类器的糖尿病分类探索性研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Mar 20;21(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01471-4.
9
Type 2 diabetes is more predictable in women than men by multiple anthropometric and biochemical measures.多项人体测量学和生物化学指标表明,女性 2 型糖尿病比男性更具可预测性。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 15;11(1):6062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-85581-z.
10
A Comparison Study of Machine Learning (Random Survival Forest) and Classic Statistic (Cox Proportional Hazards) for Predicting Progression in High-Grade Glioma after Proton and Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.机器学习(随机生存森林)与经典统计学(Cox比例风险模型)预测质子和碳离子放疗后高级别胶质瘤进展的比较研究
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 30;10:551420. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.551420. eCollection 2020.