• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“轨迹风格”儿童基本运动技能测试:高效评价系统的构建与验证。

"Track style" children's fundamental movement skills test: construction and verification of an efficient evaluation system.

机构信息

Physical Education and Sports School, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.

High School to Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 19;12:1437473. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1437473. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1437473
PMID:39228846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11369310/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to develop an efficient tool for assessing children's fundamental motor skills, the "Track style" Children's Fundamental Movement Skills Test (TCFMST), based on theories of motor development integrated with Chinese cultural context and physical education teaching situations.

METHODS

Starting from a literature analysis, the study selected items from existing fundamental movement skill (FMS) assessments, textbooks, physical education and health standards, and children's movement guidelines to construct a pool of test items. Subsequently, the items were screened and optimized using the Delphi method. Finally, the feasibility, discrimination, difficulty, reliability, and validity of the constructed test were examined using testing methods.

RESULTS

The TCFMST includes three dimensions: locomotive skills, body control skills, and manipulative skills, with a total of 10 items. The difficulty and discrimination of each item are appropriate; the correlation coefficients for retest reliability range from 0.789 to 0.943 ( < 0.01). The results of exploratory factor analysis indicate that the common factors align with the hypothesized three dimensions, indicating good structural validity of the test. The concurrent validity results show a correlation coefficient of -0.510 ( < 0.01) between the TCFMST and the total score of TGMD-3, indicating a moderate correlation between the two tests.

CONCLUSION

The TCFMST developed in this study has good difficulty, discrimination, reliability, and validity. It also features strong operability, a short duration, and high interest. It can serve as an important tool for monitoring children's fundamental motor skill levels.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在基于运动发展理论,并结合中国文化背景和体育教学实际情况,开发一种评估儿童基本运动技能的有效工具,即“Track style”儿童基本运动技能测试(TCFMST)。

方法

从文献分析入手,本研究从现有的基本运动技能(FMS)评估、教材、体育与健康标准以及儿童运动指南中选择项目,构建了一个测试项目库。随后,采用德尔菲法对项目进行筛选和优化。最后,采用测试法检验构建的测试的可行性、区分度、难度、信度和效度。

结果

TCFMST 包括三个维度:移动技能、身体控制技能和操作技能,共 10 个项目。每个项目的难度和区分度都适中;重测信度的相关系数范围为 0.789 至 0.943(<0.01)。探索性因子分析的结果表明,共同因素与假设的三个维度一致,表明测试具有良好的结构效度。同时,TCFMST 与 TGMD-3 的总分之间的相关性系数为-0.510(<0.01),表明两种测试之间存在中度相关。

结论

本研究开发的 TCFMST 具有良好的难度、区分度、信度和效度。它还具有很强的可操作性、较短的测试时间和较高的趣味性,可以作为监测儿童基本运动技能水平的重要工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0868/11369310/bd1b75002dee/fpubh-12-1437473-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0868/11369310/771f6d82d24d/fpubh-12-1437473-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0868/11369310/df9e6e537e0f/fpubh-12-1437473-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0868/11369310/bd1b75002dee/fpubh-12-1437473-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0868/11369310/771f6d82d24d/fpubh-12-1437473-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0868/11369310/df9e6e537e0f/fpubh-12-1437473-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0868/11369310/bd1b75002dee/fpubh-12-1437473-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
"Track style" children's fundamental movement skills test: construction and verification of an efficient evaluation system.“轨迹风格”儿童基本运动技能测试:高效评价系统的构建与验证。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 19;12:1437473. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1437473. eCollection 2024.
2
The development of a short form of the Test of Gross Motor Development-2 in Brazilian children: Validity and reliability.巴西儿童粗大运动发育测试 -2 简版的编制:效度与信度
Child Care Health Dev. 2018 Sep;44(5):759-765. doi: 10.1111/cch.12598. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
3
Validity and reliability of a pictorial instrument for assessing perceived motor competence in Portuguese children.一种用于评估葡萄牙儿童感知运动能力的图片工具的效度和信度。
Child Care Health Dev. 2016 Sep;42(5):666-74. doi: 10.1111/cch.12359. Epub 2016 Jun 7.
4
Fundamental Movement Skills Are More than Run, Throw and Catch: The Role of Stability Skills.基本运动技能不止于跑、投和接球:稳定技能的作用。
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 15;10(10):e0140224. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140224. eCollection 2015.
5
Bifactor structure and model reliability of the Test of Gross Motor Development - 3rd edition.《测试运动发育-第三版》的双因素结构和模型可靠性。
J Sci Med Sport. 2021 Jan;24(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.08.009. Epub 2020 Sep 5.
6
The effect of planned active play on the fundamental movement skills of preschool children.计划性主动游戏对学龄前儿童基本运动技能的影响。
Hum Mov Sci. 2024 Aug;96:103241. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2024.103241. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
7
Examining construct validity of a new naturalistic observational assessment of hand skills for preschool- and school-age children.检验一种针对学龄前和学龄儿童手部技能的新型自然观察评估方法的结构效度。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2012 Apr;59(2):108-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2012.00997.x. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
8
Investigation of the motor skills assessments of typically developing preschool children in China.中国正常发展学龄前儿童运动技能评估的研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2022 Feb 11;22(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-03098-w.
9
Psychometric proprieties of the Test of Gross Motor Development-Third Edition in a large sample of Italian children.《粗大运动发育测试第三版》在意大利大样本儿童中的心理测量特性。
J Sci Med Sport. 2020 Sep;23(9):860-865. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2020.02.014. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
10
Face validity and reliability of a pictorial instrument for assessing fundamental movement skill perceived competence in young children.一种用于评估幼儿基本运动技能感知能力的图片工具的表面效度和信度。
J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Jan;18(1):98-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.12.004. Epub 2014 Jan 2.

本文引用的文献

1
The fus test: a promising tool for evaluating fundamental motor skills in children and adolescents.跗舟试验:评估儿童和青少年基本运动技能的有前途工具。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Oct 3;23(1):1912. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16843-w.
2
Effects of fundamental movement skills on health-related quality of life in Chinese school-age children: the mediating role of physical fitness level.基本运动技能对中国学龄儿童健康相关生活质量的影响:身体素质水平的中介作用。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 3;11:1023662. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1023662. eCollection 2023.
3
Development of an Assessment of Ethics for Chinese Physical Education Teachers: A Study Using the Delphi and Expert Ranking Methods.
开发中国体育教师伦理评估工具:德尔菲法和专家评分法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 21;19(19):11905. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191911905.
4
An Intervention-Related Comparison of Preschoolers' Scores on the TGMD-2 and TGMD-3.基于干预的学龄前儿童 TGMD-2 和 TGMD-3 得分比较。
Percept Mot Skills. 2021 Aug;128(4):1354-1372. doi: 10.1177/00315125211013217. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
Exploring the relationships between fundamental movement skills and health related fitness components in children.探讨儿童基本运动技能与健康相关体能成分之间的关系。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2022 Feb;22(2):171-181. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2020.1847201. Epub 2020 Dec 17.
6
Investigating the Age-Related Association between Perceived Motor Competence and Actual Motor Competence in Adolescence.探讨青少年感知运动能力与实际运动能力之间的年龄相关性关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 1;17(17):6361. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17176361.
7
The validity and reliability of observational assessment tools available to measure fundamental movement skills in school-age children: A systematic review.观察评估工具在测量学龄儿童基本运动技能方面的有效性和可靠性:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 25;15(8):e0237919. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237919. eCollection 2020.
8
Validity and reliability evidence for motor competence assessments in children and adolescents: A systematic review.儿童和青少年运动能力评估的有效性和可靠性证据:系统评价。
J Sports Sci. 2020 Aug;38(15):1717-1798. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2020.1756674. Epub 2020 Jul 1.
9
The Development of Chinese Assessment and Evaluation of Physical Literacy (CAEPL): A Study Using Delphi Method.中文体质健康素养评估与评价工具(CAEPL)的研制:德尔菲法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 16;17(8):2720. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082720.
10
Results from Canada's 2018 Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth.加拿大《2018年儿童与青少年身体活动成绩单》的结果。
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Nov 1;15(S2):S328-S330. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2018-0454.