Li Vivian, Frasier Kelly, Vinagolu-Baur Julia, Chapman Olivia, Loperfito Alexandra, Daly Kathleen, Taranto Viktoria
Nuvance Health, Vassar Brothers Medical Center, Poughkeepsie, NY 12601, USA.
State University of New York, Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY 13210, USA.
J Skin Cancer. 2024 Aug 27;2024:2167176. doi: 10.1155/2024/2167176. eCollection 2024.
Melanoma in challenging anatomical locations such as the face, acral surfaces, and mucosal areas presents unique hurdles for surgical excision. This review examines alternative nonsurgical treatment modalities in the context of these complexities, addressing the gaps in current guidelines and the varied efficacy of existing therapies. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases. The review focuses on peer-reviewed articles discussing nonsurgical treatment options for melanoma in complex anatomical locations. Articles were screened by three independent researchers, ensuring a broad analysis of topical agents, immunotherapies, radiotherapies, and targeted therapies. The review highlights significant advancements in localized treatments such as imiquimod and intralesional therapy with talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), which show promise in managing nonexcisable melanomas. BRAF and MEK inhibitors, as well as checkpoint inhibitors targeting CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways, demonstrate improved survival rates but pose challenges with resistance and systemic side effects. Radiotherapy serves as an adjunctive strategy due to melanoma's inherent radioresistant properties. Despite advancements, there is a notable absence of comprehensive, evidence-based protocols to guide the treatment of melanoma in these critical areas. This paper underscores the need for standardized treatment guidelines that account for the efficacy, side effects, and psychosocial impacts of therapies. Future research should focus on refining existing treatments and exploring innovative modalities to enhance patient outcomes in the management of nonexcisable melanomas. Comprehensive guidelines and long-term efficacy studies are essential to optimize care and improve the quality of life for patients afflicted with melanoma in challenging anatomical locations.
在面部、肢端和黏膜区域等具有挑战性的解剖部位发生的黑色素瘤,给手术切除带来了独特的障碍。本综述在这些复杂性背景下研究了替代性非手术治疗方式,探讨了当前指南中的空白以及现有疗法的不同疗效。使用PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库进行了全面的文献检索。该综述重点关注讨论复杂解剖部位黑色素瘤非手术治疗选择的同行评议文章。由三位独立研究人员筛选文章,确保对局部用药、免疫疗法、放射疗法和靶向疗法进行广泛分析。该综述强调了咪喹莫特和瘤内注射talimogene laherparepvec(T-VEC)等局部治疗的重大进展,这些疗法在治疗无法切除的黑色素瘤方面显示出前景。BRAF和MEK抑制剂以及靶向CTLA-4和PD-1/PD-L1通路的检查点抑制剂显示出生存率提高,但存在耐药性和全身副作用的挑战。由于黑色素瘤固有的抗辐射特性,放射疗法作为一种辅助策略。尽管取得了进展,但明显缺乏全面的、基于证据的方案来指导这些关键部位黑色素瘤的治疗。本文强调需要制定标准化治疗指南,考虑到疗法的疗效、副作用和社会心理影响。未来的研究应侧重于改进现有治疗方法并探索创新模式,以提高无法切除黑色素瘤管理中的患者结局。全面的指南和长期疗效研究对于优化护理和改善在具有挑战性解剖部位患黑色素瘤患者的生活质量至关重要。