Soldan Anja, Wang Jiangxia, Pettigrew Corinne, Davatzikos Christos, Erus Guray, Hohman Timothy J, Dumitrescu Logan, Bilgel Murat, Resnick Susan M, Rivera-Rivera Leonardo A, Langhough Rebecca, Johnson Sterling C, Benzinger Tammie, Morris John C, Laws Simon M, Fripp Jurgen, Masters Colin L, Albert Marilyn S
Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Brain Commun. 2024 Aug 14;6(5):fcae276. doi: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae276. eCollection 2024.
Reduced brain volumes and more prominent white matter hyperintensities on MRI scans are commonly observed among older adults without cognitive impairment. However, it remains unclear whether rates of change in these measures among cognitively normal adults differ as a function of genetic risk for late-onset Alzheimer's disease, including -ɛ4, -ɛ2 and Alzheimer's disease polygenic risk scores (AD-PRS), and whether these relationships are influenced by other variables. This longitudinal study examined the trajectories of regional brain volumes and white matter hyperintensities in relationship to genotypes ( = 1541) and AD-PRS ( = 1093) in a harmonized dataset of middle-aged and older individuals with normal cognition at baseline (mean baseline age = 66 years, SD = 9.6) and an average of 5.3 years of MRI follow-up (max = 24 years). Atrophy on volumetric MRI scans was quantified in three ways: (i) a composite score of regions vulnerable to Alzheimer's disease (SPARE-AD); (ii) hippocampal volume; and (iii) a composite score of regions indexing advanced non-Alzheimer's disease-related brain aging (SPARE-BA). Global white matter hyperintensity volumes were derived from fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) MRI. Using linear mixed effects models, there was an -ɛ4 gene-dose effect on atrophy in the SPARE-AD composite and hippocampus, with greatest atrophy among ɛ4/ɛ4 carriers, followed by ɛ4 heterozygouts, and lowest among ɛ3 homozygouts and ɛ2/ɛ2 and ɛ2/ɛ3 carriers, who did not differ from one another. The negative associations of -4 with atrophy were reduced among those with higher education ( < 0.04) and younger baseline ages ( < 0.03). Higher AD-PRS were also associated with greater atrophy in SPARE-AD ( = 0.035) and the hippocampus ( = 0.014), independent of -ɛ4 status. -ɛ2 status (ɛ2/ɛ2 and ɛ2/ɛ3 combined) was not related to baseline levels or atrophy in SPARE-AD, SPARE-BA or the hippocampus, but was related to greater increases in white matter hyperintensities ( = 0.014). Additionally, there was an -ɛ4 × AD-PRS interaction in relation to white matter hyperintensities ( = 0.038), with greater increases in white matter hyperintensities among -ɛ4 carriers with higher AD-PRS. and AD-PRS associations with MRI measures did not differ by sex. These results suggest that -4 and AD-PRS independently and additively influence longitudinal declines in brain volumes sensitive to Alzheimer's disease and synergistically increase white matter hyperintensity accumulation among cognitively normal individuals. Conversely, -2 primarily influences white matter hyperintensity accumulation, not brain atrophy. Results are consistent with the view that genetic factors for Alzheimer's disease influence atrophy in a regionally specific manner, likely reflecting preclinical neurodegeneration, and that Alzheimer's disease risk genes contribute to white matter hyperintensity formation.
在没有认知障碍的老年人中,磁共振成像(MRI)扫描显示脑容量减少和白质高信号更为明显。然而,尚不清楚认知正常成年人中这些指标的变化率是否因晚发性阿尔茨海默病的遗传风险而有所不同,包括-ɛ4、-ɛ2以及阿尔茨海默病多基因风险评分(AD-PRS),也不清楚这些关系是否受其他变量影响。这项纵向研究在一个基线认知正常的中老年个体(平均基线年龄 = 66岁,标准差 = 9.6)的统一数据集中,研究了区域脑容量和白质高信号与基因型(n = 1541)和AD-PRS(n = 1093)的关系,平均MRI随访时间为5.3年(最长24年)。通过三种方式对容积MRI扫描的萎缩情况进行量化:(i)易患阿尔茨海默病区域的综合评分(SPARE-AD);(ii)海马体体积;(iii)指示非阿尔茨海默病相关脑老化进展区域的综合评分(SPARE-BA)。全局白质高信号体积由液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)MRI得出。使用线性混合效应模型,-ɛ4基因剂量效应与SPARE-AD综合评分和海马体萎缩相关,ɛ4/ɛ4携带者萎缩最严重,其次是ɛ4杂合子,ɛ3纯合子、ɛ2/ɛ2和ɛ2/ɛ3携带者萎缩最轻,且他们之间无差异。在受教育程度较高者(p < 0.04)和基线年龄较小者(p < 0.03)中,-ɛ4与萎缩的负相关关系减弱。较高的AD-PRS也与SPARE-AD(p = 0.035)和海马体(p = 0.014)的更大萎缩相关,与-ɛ4状态无关。-ɛ2状态(合并ɛ2/ɛ2和ɛ2/ɛ3)与SPARE-AD、SPARE-BA或海马体的基线水平或萎缩无关,但与白质高信号的更大增加相关(p = 0.014)。此外,在白质高信号方面存在-ɛ4×AD-PRS相互作用(p = 0.038),AD-PRS较高的-ɛ4携带者白质高信号增加更大。-ɛ4和AD-PRS与MRI指标的关联在性别上无差异。这些结果表明,-ɛ4和AD-PRS独立且累加地影响对阿尔茨海默病敏感的脑容量纵向下降,并协同增加认知正常个体的白质高信号积累。相反,-ɛ2主要影响白质高信号积累,而非脑萎缩。结果与以下观点一致,即阿尔茨海默病的遗传因素以区域特异性方式影响萎缩,可能反映临床前神经退行性变,且阿尔茨海默病风险基因促成白质高信号形成。