Panicucci F, Angeloni G, Arrighi S, Bucci E, DiMambro G, Lecchini L, Pitruzzello S, Positano M
J Biol Stand. 1985 Apr;13(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/s0092-1157(85)80016-0.
Two secondary standards for use in routine assays of Factor VIII in therapeutic concentrates and in patients, plasmas, respectively, have been established in a multicenter collaborative study. In order to assess the effect of the adoption of these preparations as common Secondary Standards a comparative assay has been performed: one sample of a Factor VIII concentrate of intermediate purity and one plasma sample have been tested in two laboratories for Factor VIII:C activity using as reference, among others, the common working standard. Analysis of the results shows that with the plasma sample the differences of the estimates obtained with any of the references in our two laboratories were not statistically significant (P greater than 0.3), while with the concentrate sample the differences were always statistically significant (P less than 0.005). The study shows that the adoption of common working standards (besides the uniformity in assay method, reagents and basic equipment) is not sufficient to eliminate interlaboratory variation in the measurement of Factor VIII:C.
在一项多中心协作研究中,分别建立了两种二级标准品,用于治疗性浓缩物和患者血浆中因子 VIII 的常规检测。为了评估采用这些制剂作为通用二级标准品的效果,进行了一项比较检测:在两个实验室中,使用通用工作标准品等作为参考,对一份中等纯度的因子 VIII 浓缩物样品和一份血浆样品进行了因子 VIII:C 活性检测。结果分析表明,对于血浆样品,我们两个实验室使用任何一种参考品获得的估计值差异均无统计学意义(P>0.3),而对于浓缩物样品,差异始终具有统计学意义(P<0.005)。该研究表明,采用通用工作标准品(除了检测方法、试剂和基本设备的一致性外)不足以消除实验室间在因子 VIII:C 测量中的差异。