Hanson S R, Harker L A, Bjornsson T D
J Clin Invest. 1985 May;75(5):1591-9. doi: 10.1172/JCI111865.
To resolve questions of drug actions, efficacy, and interactions for platelet-modifying agents used clinically, we have compared the relative capacities and mechanisms of aspirin, dipyridamole, sulfinpyrazone, and dazoxiben to prevent arterial thromboembolism in a baboon model. In 136 studies the agents were given twice daily by oral administration both singly and in combination. The antithrombotic efficacy of a given therapy was determined by its capacity to interrupt steady-state platelet utilization induced by thrombogenic arteriovenous cannulae. When given alone, dipyridamole and sulfinpyrazone reduced the rate at which platelets were utilized by thrombus formation in a dose-dependent manner with essentially complete interruption by dipyridamole at 10 mg/kg per d. In contrast, neither aspirin (2-100 mg/kg per d) nor dazoxiben (20-100 mg/kg per d) decreased cannula platelet consumption detectably despite the striking reduction in the capacity of platelets to produce thromboxane B2. However, aspirin, but not dazoxiben, potentiated the antithrombotic effects of dipyridamole and sulfinpyrazone in a dose-dependent fashion without changing the pharmacokinetics for any of the agents. Complete potentiation required aspirin at 20 mg/kg per d to be given with each dose of dipyridamole. Because dazoxiben's blockade of platelet thromboxane A2 production was not associated with antithrombotic potentiation, and because complete potentiation by aspirin required a dose that fully inhibited vascular production of prostaglandin I2 (PGI2), we conclude that aspirin's potentiating effect on dipyridamole is independent of PGI2 production or inhibition of thromboxane A2 formation. In addition, because frequent repeated and synchronous dosing of aspirin was necessary, aspirin's potentiating effects appear to be produced by mechanism(s) unrelated to its potent, irreversible inhibition of platelet cyclooxygenase.
为解决临床上使用的血小板修饰剂的药物作用、疗效及相互作用问题,我们在狒狒模型中比较了阿司匹林、双嘧达莫、磺吡酮和达唑氧苯预防动脉血栓栓塞的相对能力及机制。在136项研究中,这些药物每日口服给药两次,单独给药及联合给药。特定治疗的抗血栓形成疗效通过其中断由致血栓形成的动静脉插管诱导的稳态血小板利用的能力来确定。单独给药时,双嘧达莫和磺吡酮以剂量依赖方式降低血栓形成时血小板的利用速率,双嘧达莫每日10mg/kg时基本能完全中断。相比之下,尽管血小板产生血栓素B2的能力显著降低,但阿司匹林(每日2 - 100mg/kg)和达唑氧苯(每日20 - 100mg/kg)均未检测到降低插管处血小板消耗。然而,阿司匹林而非达唑氧苯以剂量依赖方式增强双嘧达莫和磺吡酮的抗血栓形成作用,且未改变任何一种药物的药代动力学。完全增强作用需要每日20mg/kg的阿司匹林与每剂双嘧达莫同时给药。由于达唑氧苯对血小板血栓素A2产生的阻断与抗血栓形成增强作用无关,且阿司匹林的完全增强作用需要一个能完全抑制血管生成前列腺素I2(PGI2)的剂量,我们得出结论,阿司匹林对双嘧达莫的增强作用独立于PGI2的产生或血栓素A2形成的抑制。此外,由于阿司匹林需要频繁重复且同步给药,阿司匹林的增强作用似乎是由与其对血小板环氧化酶的强效、不可逆抑制无关的机制产生的。