Adamchic Ilya, Kantelhardt Sven R, Wagner Hans-Joachim, Burbelko Michael
Department of Radiology, Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Landsberger Allee 49, 10249, Berlin, Germany.
Department of Neurosurgery, Vivantes Hospital im Friedrichshain, Landsberger Allee 49, 10249, Berlin, Germany.
Neuroradiology. 2024 Dec;66(12):2195-2204. doi: 10.1007/s00234-024-03460-6. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic performance of commercially available AI software for intracranial aneurysm detection and to determine if the AI system enhances the radiologist's accuracy in identifying aneurysms and reduces image analysis time.
TOF-MRA clinical brain examinations were analyzed using commercially available software and by an consultant neuroradiologist for the presence of intracranial aneurysms. The results were compared with the reference standard, to measure the sensitivity and specificity of the software and the consultant neuroradiologist. Furthermore, we examined the time required for the neuroradiologist to analyze the TOF-MRA image set, both with and without use of the AI software.
In 500 TOF-MRI brain studies, 106 aneurysms were detected in 85 examinations by combining AI software with neuroradiologist readings. The neuroradiologist identified 98 aneurysms (92.5% sensitivity), while AI detected 77 aneurysms (72.6% sensitivity). Specificity and sensitivity were calculated from the combined effort as reference. Combining AI and neuroradiologist readings significantly improves detection reliability. Additionally, AI integration reduced TOF-MRA analysis time by 19 s (23% reduction).
Our findings indicate that the AI-based software can support neuroradiologists in interpreting brain TOF-MRA. A combined reading of the AI-based software and the neuroradiologist demonstrated higher reliability in identifying intracranial aneurysms as compared to reading by either neuroradiologist or software, thus improving diagnostic accuracy of the neuroradiologist. Simultaneously, reading time for the neuroradiologist was reduced by approximately one quarter.
我们研究的目的是评估市售人工智能软件用于颅内动脉瘤检测的诊断性能,并确定该人工智能系统是否能提高放射科医生识别动脉瘤的准确性并减少图像分析时间。
使用市售软件并由神经放射科顾问对TOF-MRA临床脑部检查进行分析,以确定是否存在颅内动脉瘤。将结果与参考标准进行比较,以测量软件和神经放射科顾问的敏感性和特异性。此外,我们还检查了神经放射科医生在使用和不使用人工智能软件的情况下分析TOF-MRA图像集所需的时间。
在500例TOF-MRI脑部研究中,通过将人工智能软件与神经放射科医生的读数相结合,在85次检查中检测到106个动脉瘤。神经放射科医生识别出98个动脉瘤(敏感性为92.5%),而人工智能检测到77个动脉瘤(敏感性为72.6%)。以联合结果作为参考计算特异性和敏感性。将人工智能和神经放射科医生的读数相结合可显著提高检测可靠性。此外,集成人工智能可将TOF-MRA分析时间减少19秒(减少23%)。
我们的研究结果表明,基于人工智能的软件可以支持神经放射科医生解读脑部TOF-MRA。与神经放射科医生或软件单独解读相比,基于人工智能的软件和神经放射科医生联合解读在识别颅内动脉瘤方面具有更高的可靠性,从而提高了神经放射科医生的诊断准确性。同时,神经放射科医生的解读时间减少了约四分之一。