Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Psychol Res. 2022 Oct;86(7):2278-2288. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1139-8. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
The reaction time-based Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) has high validity in assessing recognition of critical information. Findings on its usefulness for diagnosing face recognition in eyewitnesses are inconsistent. Experiment 1 (N = 82) tested whether closely matching the faces of the probes and irrelevants, as required for a fair lineup, undermines RT-CIT usefulness. Preregistered Experiments 2a and 2b (Ns = 48), tested the role of eyewitness cooperativeness for RT-CIT validity. All participants watched a mock crime video and then completed an RT-CIT. As expected, the usefulness of the RT-CIT was moderated by picture similarity, with better detection for non-matched faces. Unexpectedly, eyewitness cooperation (conceal vs. reveal recognition), did not affect the validity of the RT-CIT. A large CIT effect observed in Experiment 2b further suggested that-even with matched faces-the RT-CIT might be of use when encoding conditions during the crime were favorable. Cases in which witnesses are unwilling or afraid to make an explicit identification might concern another possible application.
基于反应时的隐藏信息测验(RT-CIT)在评估对关键信息的识别方面具有很高的有效性。关于其对面部识别的目击证人诊断有用性的研究结果并不一致。实验 1(N=82)检验了在进行公平阵容时是否需要匹配探针和不相关的面孔来削弱 RT-CIT 的有效性。预先注册的实验 2a 和 2b(N=48)检验了目击证人合作对 RT-CIT 有效性的作用。所有参与者观看了一段模拟犯罪视频,然后完成了 RT-CIT。正如预期的那样,RT-CIT 的有效性受到图片相似度的调节,非匹配面孔的检测效果更好。出乎意料的是,目击证人的合作(隐瞒与揭露识别)并没有影响 RT-CIT 的有效性。实验 2b 中观察到的大型 CIT 效应进一步表明,即使是匹配的面孔,当犯罪期间的编码条件有利时,RT-CIT 也可能有用。在证人不愿意或害怕进行明确识别的情况下,可能会涉及另一种可能的应用。