Alto Neuroscience Inc, Los Altos, California.
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 1;81(11):1142-1147. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2553.
Advancing precision psychiatry, where treatments are based on an individual's biology rather than solely their clinical presentation, requires attention to several key attributes for any candidate biomarker. These include test-retest reliability, sensitivity to relevant neurophysiology, cost-effectiveness, and scalability. Unfortunately, these issues have not been systematically addressed by biomarker development efforts that use common neuroimaging tools like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). Here, the critical barriers that neuroimaging methods will need to overcome to achieve clinical relevance in the near to intermediate term are examined.
Reliability is often overlooked, which together with sensitivity to key aspects of neurophysiology and replicated predictive utility, favors EEG-based methods. The principal barrier for EEG has been the lack of large-scale data collection among multisite psychiatric consortia. By contrast, despite its high reliability, structural MRI has not demonstrated clinical utility in psychiatry, which may be due to its limited sensitivity to psychiatry-relevant neurophysiology. Given the prevalence of structural MRIs, establishment of a compelling clinical use case remains its principal barrier. By contrast, low reliability and difficulty in standardizing collection are the principal barriers for functional MRI, along with the need for demonstration that its superior spatial resolution over EEG and ability to directly image subcortical regions in fact provide unique clinical value. Often missing, moreover, is consideration of how these various scientific issues can be balanced against practical economic realities of psychiatric health care delivery today, for which embedding economic modeling into biomarker development efforts may help direct research efforts.
EEG seems most ripe for near- to intermediate-term clinical impact, especially considering its scalability and cost-effectiveness. Recent efforts to broaden its collection, as well as development of low-cost turnkey systems, suggest a promising pathway by which neuroimaging can impact clinical care. Continued MRI research focused on its key barriers may hold promise for longer-horizon utility.
推进精准精神病学,即根据个体的生物学特征而非仅基于其临床表现来制定治疗方案,需要关注任何候选生物标志物的几个关键属性。这些属性包括测试-重测可靠性、对相关神经生理学的敏感性、成本效益和可扩展性。不幸的是,使用磁共振成像(MRI)和脑电图(EEG)等常见神经影像学工具的生物标志物开发工作并未系统地解决这些问题。在此,探讨了神经影像学方法在近期至中期内实现临床相关性所需克服的关键障碍。
可靠性往往被忽视,而与神经生理学关键方面的敏感性和可复制的预测实用性相结合,则有利于基于 EEG 的方法。EEG 的主要障碍是缺乏多中心精神科联盟的大规模数据收集。相比之下,尽管 MRI 的可靠性很高,但在精神病学中尚未显示出临床实用性,这可能是由于其对与精神病学相关的神经生理学的敏感性有限。鉴于结构性 MRI 的普遍性,建立一个有说服力的临床应用案例仍然是其主要障碍。相比之下,低可靠性和难以标准化采集是功能磁共振成像的主要障碍,还需要证明其优于 EEG 的空间分辨率和直接成像皮质下区域的能力实际上提供了独特的临床价值。此外,通常还缺乏考虑如何在今天的精神卫生保健提供的实际经济现实中平衡这些各种科学问题,在生物标志物开发工作中嵌入经济建模可能有助于指导研究工作。
考虑到 EEG 的可扩展性和成本效益,它似乎最适合在近期至中期内产生临床影响。最近扩大其采集范围的努力,以及低成本交钥匙系统的开发,为神经影像学如何影响临床护理提供了一个有前途的途径。持续关注 MRI 研究的关键障碍可能对更长期的应用有希望。