• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Fostering a Trusting Relationship With Family in Dementia Special Care Units: A Participatory Action Research Project.在痴呆症特殊护理单元中与家庭建立信任关系:一项参与式行动研究项目。
J Adv Nurs. 2025 Apr;81(4):2039-2049. doi: 10.1111/jan.16432. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Family involvement in dementia special care units in nursing homes: A qualitative care ethical study into family experiences.养老院痴呆症特殊护理单元中的家庭参与:一项关于家庭经历的定性护理伦理研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jan;80(1):200-213. doi: 10.1111/jan.15794. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
3
Nursing home residents' perspectives on their social relationships.养老院居民对其社会关系的看法。
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Apr;29(7-8):1162-1174. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15174. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
4
Family involvement in nursing homes: an interpretative synthesis of literature.家庭参与养老院护理:文献的阐释性综合。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Sep;29(6):1530-1544. doi: 10.1177/09697330221085774. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
5
Organising general practice for care homes: a multi-method study.为养老院组织全科医疗服务:一项多方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Apr;13(11):1-68. doi: 10.3310/YNDV6358.
6
Effectiveness of interventions to improve family-staff relationships in the care of people with dementia in residential aged care: a systematic review protocol.改善老年护理机构中痴呆症患者护理中家庭与工作人员关系的干预措施的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):52-63. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2415.
7
'We, not them and us?' Views on the relationships and interactions between staff and relatives of older people permanently living in nursing homes.“我们,而非他们和我们?”关于长期居住在养老院的老年人的工作人员与亲属之间的关系及互动的观点。
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Mar;31(3):614-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01317.x.
8
How Nursing Home Nurses Who Care for Residents With Dementia Experience the Moral Distress? A Phenomenography Study.照顾痴呆症患者的养老院护士如何体验道德困扰?一项现象学研究。
Nurs Open. 2025 Mar;12(3):e70171. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70171.
9
We're on the same side: improving communication between nursing home and family.我们站在同一阵线:改善养老院与家庭之间的沟通。
Health Commun. 2009 Jan;24(1):12-20. doi: 10.1080/10410230802606950.
10
A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.一项改善养老院中晚期痴呆症患者生活质量的团体干预措施:Namaste 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(6):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta24060.

本文引用的文献

1
Temporalities of Aged Care: Time Scarcity, Care Time and Well-Being in Danish Nursing Homes.老年护理的时间性:丹麦养老院的时间稀缺、护理时间和幸福感。
Med Anthropol. 2023 Aug 18;42(6):551-564. doi: 10.1080/01459740.2023.2235066. Epub 2023 Jul 24.
2
Family involvement in dementia special care units in nursing homes: A qualitative care ethical study into family experiences.养老院痴呆症特殊护理单元中的家庭参与:一项关于家庭经历的定性护理伦理研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Jan;80(1):200-213. doi: 10.1111/jan.15794. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
3
Family involvement in nursing homes: an interpretative synthesis of literature.家庭参与养老院护理:文献的阐释性综合。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Sep;29(6):1530-1544. doi: 10.1177/09697330221085774. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
4
Interventions promoting family involvement with care homes following placement of a relative with dementia: A systematic review.干预措施促进家庭参与养老院护理:系统综述。
Dementia (London). 2022 Feb;21(2):618-647. doi: 10.1177/14713012211046595. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
5
Family Caregivers' Conceptions of Trust in Home Health Care Providers.家庭护理员对家庭医疗保健提供者的信任观念。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2021 Jul-Aug;14(4):200-210. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20210526-01. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
6
Quality Characteristics for Clinical Ethics Support in the Netherlands.荷兰临床伦理支持的质量特征
AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2022 Jan-Mar;13(1):22-32. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2021.1925776. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
7
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based guidelines in long-term care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.实施长期护理循证指南的障碍和促进因素:定性证据综合。
Implement Sci. 2021 Jul 9;16(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01140-0.
8
The Story as a Quality Instrument: Developing an Instrument for Quality Improvement Based on Narratives of Older Adults Receiving Long-Term Care.作为质量工具的故事:基于接受长期护理的老年人的叙述开发一种质量改进工具。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 9;18(5):2773. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052773.
9
Partnerships in nursing homes: How do family caregivers of residents with dementia perceive collaboration with staff?养老院中的伙伴关系:痴呆症患者的家庭照顾者如何看待与员工的合作?
Dementia (London). 2021 Jul;20(5):1631-1648. doi: 10.1177/1471301220962235. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
10
Expectations and Needs of Families in Nursing Homes: An Integrative Review.养老院中家庭的期望和需求:综合回顾。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Aug;78(4):311-325. doi: 10.1177/1077558720907183. Epub 2020 Feb 26.

在痴呆症特殊护理单元中与家庭建立信任关系:一项参与式行动研究项目。

Fostering a Trusting Relationship With Family in Dementia Special Care Units: A Participatory Action Research Project.

作者信息

Hovenga Nina, Landeweer Elleke, Lesman-Leegte Ivonne, Van Twillert Sacha, Vinckers Floor, Zuidema Sytse, Leget Carlo

机构信息

Department of Primary- and Long-Term Care, University of Groningen, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Care Ethics, University of Humanistic Studies, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2025 Apr;81(4):2039-2049. doi: 10.1111/jan.16432. Epub 2024 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1111/jan.16432
PMID:39231738
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11896835/
Abstract

AIM

To explore experiences of nursing home staff in implementing self-designed interventions to foster trusting relationships with family in practice.

DESIGN

This qualitative study used a Participatory Action Research approach.

METHODS

Data collection included focus groups (n = 15), interviews (n = 28) and observations (n = 5). A holistic narrative approach was used for data analysis, resulting in co-constructed narratives representing experiences of nursing home staff in implementing four different interventions in five Dutch dementia special care units in nursing homes. The data collection period began in August 2021 and ended in April 2022.

RESULTS

Nursing home staff implemented self-designed interventions to foster trusting relationships with family, including initiating informal conversations, sharing residents' 'happy' moments, discussing mutual expectations, and being more aware of families' emotional burdens. Identified facilitators emphasise the importance of reciprocity, familiarity, transparency, realistic goal setting and empathy. Identified barriers are related to moral uncertainty in balancing competing demands, conflicting social norms, prioritising hands-on care tasks over family contact and lack of courage to act.

CONCLUSION

Nursing home staff conclude that their interventions contribute positively to building and maintaining a trusting relationship with families.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: Sharing the narratives of nursing home staff with peers would support them in implementing interventions to foster trust. Regular Moral Case Deliberations can be used to address moral uncertainty. Collective dialogue among nursing home staff can be useful in establishing new social norms that prioritise family involvement. Conversation skills training can empower nursing home staff.

IMPACT

Trust between nursing home staff and families can be improved by implementing the conducted interventions.

REPORTING METHOD

This report adheres to the standards for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contribution.

摘要

目的

探讨养老院工作人员在实践中实施自行设计的干预措施以促进与家属建立信任关系的经验。

设计

本定性研究采用参与式行动研究方法。

方法

数据收集包括焦点小组(n = 15)、访谈(n = 28)和观察(n = 5)。采用整体叙事方法进行数据分析,得出共同构建的叙事,代表养老院工作人员在荷兰五家养老院的痴呆症特殊护理单元实施四种不同干预措施的经验。数据收集期从2021年8月开始,至2022年4月结束。

结果

养老院工作人员实施自行设计的干预措施以促进与家属建立信任关系,包括开展非正式对话、分享居民的“快乐”时刻、讨论相互期望以及更加关注家属的情感负担。确定的促进因素强调互惠、熟悉、透明、现实目标设定和同理心的重要性。确定的障碍与平衡相互冲突的需求时的道德不确定性、相互冲突的社会规范、将实际护理任务置于与家属联系之上以及缺乏行动勇气有关。

结论

养老院工作人员得出结论,他们的干预措施对与家属建立和维持信任关系有积极贡献。

对专业和/或患者护理的启示:与同行分享养老院工作人员的叙事将支持他们实施促进信任的干预措施。定期进行道德案例审议可用于解决道德不确定性。养老院工作人员之间的集体对话有助于建立优先考虑家属参与的新社会规范。沟通技巧培训可增强养老院工作人员的能力。

影响

通过实施所开展的干预措施可改善养老院工作人员与家属之间的信任。

报告方法

本报告遵循定性研究报告标准(COREQ)。

患者或公众贡献

无患者或公众贡献。