• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从矿区土壤中分离的细菌对铀的去除作用及其解毒物质:性能、机制和细菌群落。

Effects of Detoxifying Substances on Uranium Removal by Bacteria Isolated from Mine Soils: Performance, Mechanisms, and Bacterial Communities.

机构信息

Hunan Province Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, 421001, China.

College of Environment and Ecology, Key Laboratory of the Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400045, China.

出版信息

Microb Ecol. 2024 Sep 5;87(1):111. doi: 10.1007/s00248-024-02428-6.

DOI:10.1007/s00248-024-02428-6
PMID:39231820
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11374843/
Abstract

In this study, we investigated the effect of detoxifying substances on U(VI) removal by bacteria isolated from mine soil. The results demonstrated that the highest U(VI) removal efficiency (85.6%) was achieved at pH 6.0 and a temperature of 35 °C, with an initial U(VI) concentration of 10 mg/L. For detoxifying substances, signaling molecules acyl homoserine lactone (AHLs, 0.1 µmol/L), anthraquinone-2, 6-disulfonic acid (AQDS, 1 mmol/L), reduced glutathione (GSH, 0.1 mmol/L), selenium (Se, 1 mg/L), montmorillonite (MT, 1 g/L), and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA, 0.1 mmol/L) substantially enhanced the bacterial U(VI) removal by 34.9%, 37.4%, 54.5%, 35.1%, 32.8%, and 47.8% after 12 h, respectively. This was due to the alleviation of U(VI) toxicity in bacteria through detoxifying substances, as evidenced by lower malondialdehyde (MDA) content and higher superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) activities for bacteria exposed to U(VI) and detoxifying substances, compared to those exposed to U(VI) alone. FTIR results showed that hydroxyl, carboxyl, phosphorus, and amide groups participated in the U(VI) removal. After exposure to U(VI), the relative abundances of Chryseobacterium and Stenotrophomonas increased by 48.5% and 12.5%, respectively, suggesting their tolerance ability to U(VI). Gene function prediction further demonstrated that the detoxifying substances AHLs alleviate U(VI) toxicity by influencing bacterial metabolism. This study suggests the potential application of detoxifying substances in the U(VI)-containing wastewater treatment through bioremediation.

摘要

在这项研究中,我们研究了从矿山土壤中分离出的细菌对 U(VI)去除的解毒物质的影响。结果表明,在 pH 值为 6.0 和温度为 35°C 的条件下,初始 U(VI)浓度为 10mg/L 时,U(VI)去除效率最高(85.6%)。对于解毒物质,信号分子酰高丝氨酸内酯(AHLs,0.1µmol/L)、蒽醌-2,6-二磺酸钠(AQDS,1mmol/L)、还原型谷胱甘肽(GSH,0.1mmol/L)、硒(Se,1mg/L)、蒙脱石(MT,1g/L)和乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA,0.1mmol/L)分别将细菌 U(VI)去除率提高了 34.9%、37.4%、54.5%、35.1%、32.8%和 47.8%,分别在 12 小时后。这是因为解毒物质减轻了 U(VI)对细菌的毒性,暴露于 U(VI)和解毒物质的细菌的丙二醛(MDA)含量较低,超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)活性较高,与单独暴露于 U(VI)的细菌相比。FTIR 结果表明,羟基、羧基、磷和酰胺基团参与了 U(VI)的去除。暴露于 U(VI)后,Chryseobacterium 和 Stenotrophomonas 的相对丰度分别增加了 48.5%和 12.5%,表明它们对 U(VI)的耐受能力。基因功能预测进一步表明,解毒物质 AHLs 通过影响细菌代谢来减轻 U(VI)的毒性。这项研究表明,解毒物质在通过生物修复处理含 U(VI)废水方面具有潜在的应用前景。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/90e7c031d48a/248_2024_2428_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/ee048306277b/248_2024_2428_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/2f591ca14d91/248_2024_2428_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/ca67441cf4ff/248_2024_2428_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/2875db27d25f/248_2024_2428_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/cc40f14ad9bb/248_2024_2428_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/379f9758c5d6/248_2024_2428_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/90e7c031d48a/248_2024_2428_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/ee048306277b/248_2024_2428_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/2f591ca14d91/248_2024_2428_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/ca67441cf4ff/248_2024_2428_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/2875db27d25f/248_2024_2428_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/cc40f14ad9bb/248_2024_2428_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/379f9758c5d6/248_2024_2428_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273c/11374843/90e7c031d48a/248_2024_2428_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of Detoxifying Substances on Uranium Removal by Bacteria Isolated from Mine Soils: Performance, Mechanisms, and Bacterial Communities.从矿区土壤中分离的细菌对铀的去除作用及其解毒物质:性能、机制和细菌群落。
Microb Ecol. 2024 Sep 5;87(1):111. doi: 10.1007/s00248-024-02428-6.
2
Uranium(VI) reduction and removal by high performing purified anaerobic cultures from mine soil.高性能矿土厌氧纯化培养物对六价铀的还原与去除。
Chemosphere. 2010 Jan;78(1):52-5. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.10.026. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
3
Effect of uranium (VI) on two sulphate-reducing bacteria cultures from a uranium mine site.铀(VI)对铀矿场地中两种硫酸盐还原菌培养物的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2010 May 15;408(12):2621-8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.02.032. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
4
Anaerobic bio-removal of uranium (VI) and chromium (VI): comparison of microbial community structure.厌氧生物去除铀(VI)和铬(VI):微生物群落结构的比较。
J Hazard Mater. 2010 Apr 15;176(1-3):1065-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.149. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
5
Dynamics of microbial community composition and function during in situ bioremediation of a uranium-contaminated aquifer.原位生物修复铀污染含水层过程中微生物群落组成和功能的动态变化。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Jun;77(11):3860-9. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01981-10. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
6
Accumulation of U(VI) on the Pantoea sp. TW18 isolated from radionuclide-contaminated soils.从放射性核素污染土壤中分离出的泛菌属TW18对U(VI)的积累
J Environ Radioact. 2018 Dec;192:219-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 6.
7
Enhanced U(VI) bioreduction by alginate-immobilized uranium-reducing bacteria in the presence of carbon nanotubes and anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate.在碳纳米管和蒽醌-2,6-二磺酸盐存在下,海藻酸盐固定化的铀还原菌对U(VI)的生物还原作用增强。
J Environ Sci (China). 2015 May 1;31:68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jes.2014.11.005. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
8
Optimization of a bioremediation system of soluble uranium based on the biostimulation of an indigenous bacterial community.基于对本地细菌群落进行生物刺激的可溶性铀生物修复系统的优化
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015 Jun;22(11):8442-50. doi: 10.1007/s11356-014-3980-7. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
9
Enhanced microbial remediation of uranium tailings through red soil utilization.通过利用红壤增强铀尾矿的微生物修复。
J Environ Radioact. 2024 Jul;277:107463. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2024.107463. Epub 2024 May 29.
10
Application of a high-density oligonucleotide microarray approach to study bacterial population dynamics during uranium reduction and reoxidation.应用高密度寡核苷酸微阵列方法研究铀还原和再氧化过程中的细菌种群动态。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Sep;72(9):6288-98. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00246-06.

本文引用的文献

1
Several lines of antioxidant defense against oxidative stress: antioxidant enzymes, nanomaterials with multiple enzyme-mimicking activities, and low-molecular-weight antioxidants.抗氧化防御系统应对氧化应激的几种途径:抗氧化酶、具有多种酶模拟活性的纳米材料和低分子量抗氧化剂。
Arch Toxicol. 2024 May;98(5):1323-1367. doi: 10.1007/s00204-024-03696-4. Epub 2024 Mar 14.
2
Updated RDP taxonomy and RDP Classifier for more accurate taxonomic classification.更新了RDP分类法和RDP分类器,以实现更准确的分类学分类。
Microbiol Resour Announc. 2024 Apr 11;13(4):e0106323. doi: 10.1128/mra.01063-23. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
3
Leaching behaviour and mechanism of U, Ra and Pb from uranium tailings at different pH conditions.
不同 pH 值条件下铀尾矿中 U、Ra 和 Pb 的浸出行为和机理。
J Environ Radioact. 2023 Dec;270:107300. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2023.107300. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
4
Synergy of surface adsorption and intracellular accumulation for removal of uranium with Stenotrophomonas sp: Performance and mechanisms.嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌通过表面吸附和细胞内积累协同作用去除铀:性能与机制
Environ Res. 2023 Mar 1;220:115093. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.115093. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
5
Preparation of phosphorus-modified biochar for the immobilization of heavy metals in typical lead-zinc contaminated mining soil: Performance, mechanism and microbial community.用于固定典型铅锌污染矿区土壤中重金属的磷改性生物炭的制备:性能、机制及微生物群落
Environ Res. 2023 Feb 1;218:114769. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.114769. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
6
AQDS Activates Extracellular Synergistic Biodetoxification of Copper and Selenite via Altering the Coordination Environment of Outer-Membrane Proteins.AQDS 通过改变外膜蛋白的配位环境激活铜和亚硒酸盐的细胞外协同生物解毒作用。
Environ Sci Technol. 2022 Oct 4;56(19):13786-13797. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c04130. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
7
Mutual effects of Shewanella putrefaciens-montmorillonite and their impact on uranium immobilization.希瓦氏菌-蒙脱石的相互作用及其对铀固定化的影响。
Chemosphere. 2022 Sep;303(Pt 1):135096. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135096. Epub 2022 May 23.
8
Insights into sorption speciation of uranium on phlogopite: Evidence from TRLFS and DFT calculation.金云母对铀的吸附形态研究:来自时间分辨激光荧光光谱法和密度泛函理论计算的证据
J Hazard Mater. 2022 Apr 5;427:128164. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.128164. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
9
Microbial reduction and resistance to selenium: Mechanisms, applications and prospects.微生物还原与硒抗性:机制、应用与前景。
J Hazard Mater. 2022 Jan 5;421:126684. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126684. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
10
Uranium bioremediation with U(VI)-reducing bacteria.铀的微生物还原修复。
Sci Total Environ. 2021 Dec 1;798:149107. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149107. Epub 2021 Jul 17.