• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伦敦和卢顿儿童健康(CHILL)队列研究:超低排放区对儿童上下学交通方式影响的 12 个月自然实验研究

Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL) cohort: a 12-month natural experimental study of the effects of the Ultra Low Emission Zone on children's travel to school.

机构信息

MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Box 285, Cambridge, UK.

Centre for Primary Care, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 5;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7
PMID:39232801
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11375866/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Ultra-Low Emission Zone (ULEZ), introduced in Central London in April 2019, aims to enhance air quality and improve public health. The Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL) study evaluates the impact of the ULEZ on children's health. This analysis focuses on the one-year impacts on the shift towards active travel to school.

METHODS

CHILL is a prospective parallel cohort study of ethnically diverse children, aged 6-9 years attending 84 primary schools within or with catchment areas encompassing London's ULEZ (intervention) and Luton (non-intervention area). Baseline (2018/19) and one-year follow-up (2019/20) data were collected at school visits from 1992 (58%) children who reported their mode of travel to school 'today' (day of assessment). Multilevel logistic regressions were performed to analyse associations between the introduction of the ULEZ and the likelihood of switching from inactive to active travel modes, and vice-versa. Interactions between intervention group status and pre-specified effect modifiers were also explored.

RESULTS

Among children who took inactive modes at baseline, 42% of children in London and 20% of children in Luton switched to active modes. For children taking active modes at baseline, 5% of children in London and 21% of children in Luton switched to inactive modes. Relative to the children in Luton, children in London were more likely to have switched from inactive to active modes (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.21-10.92). Children in the intervention group were also less likely to switch from active to inactive modes (OR 0.11, 0.05-0.24). Moderator analyses showed that children living further from school were more likely to switch from inactive to active modes (OR 6.06,1.87-19.68) compared to those living closer (OR 1.43, 0.27-7.54).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of clean air zones can increase uptake of active travel to school and was particularly associated with more sustainable and active travel in children living further from school.

摘要

背景

超低排放区(ULEZ)于 2019 年 4 月在伦敦市中心推出,旨在改善空气质量和公众健康。伦敦和卢顿儿童健康(CHILL)研究评估了 ULEZ 对儿童健康的影响。本分析重点关注 ULEZ 对儿童上学转向积极出行的一年影响。

方法

CHILL 是一项针对不同种族儿童的前瞻性平行队列研究,年龄在 6-9 岁,在伦敦 ULEZ(干预区)和卢顿(非干预区)的 84 所小学就读或其招生范围内。在学校访问中收集了 1992 名(58%)儿童的基线(2018/19 年)和一年随访(2019/20 年)数据,这些儿童报告了他们“今天”(评估日)上学的出行方式。使用多水平逻辑回归分析 ULEZ 引入与从非活跃交通方式向活跃交通方式转变的可能性之间的关联,反之亦然。还探索了干预组状况与预先指定的效应修饰符之间的交互作用。

结果

在基线时采用非活跃模式的儿童中,伦敦有 42%的儿童和卢顿有 20%的儿童转为活跃模式。对于基线时采用活跃模式的儿童,伦敦有 5%的儿童和卢顿有 21%的儿童转为非活跃模式。与卢顿的儿童相比,伦敦的儿童更有可能从非活跃模式转变为活跃模式(OR3.64,95%CI1.21-10.92)。干预组的儿童也不太可能从活跃模式转为非活跃模式(OR0.11,0.05-0.24)。调节分析显示,与住在较近的儿童相比,住在较远的儿童更有可能从非活跃模式转变为活跃模式(OR6.06,1.87-19.68)。

结论

清洁空气区的实施可以增加儿童上学的积极出行率,特别是与住在较远的儿童更可持续和积极的出行方式相关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2c/11375866/dc7630bb5d09/12966_2024_1621_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2c/11375866/f5d8c712881f/12966_2024_1621_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2c/11375866/f43aafa03d72/12966_2024_1621_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2c/11375866/dc7630bb5d09/12966_2024_1621_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2c/11375866/f5d8c712881f/12966_2024_1621_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2c/11375866/f43aafa03d72/12966_2024_1621_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d2c/11375866/dc7630bb5d09/12966_2024_1621_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Children's Health in London and Luton (CHILL) cohort: a 12-month natural experimental study of the effects of the Ultra Low Emission Zone on children's travel to school.伦敦和卢顿儿童健康(CHILL)队列研究:超低排放区对儿童上下学交通方式影响的 12 个月自然实验研究
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2024 Sep 5;21(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01621-7.
2
Investigating the impact of London's ultra low emission zone on children's health: children's health in London and Luton (CHILL) protocol for a prospective parallel cohort study.调查伦敦超低排放区对儿童健康的影响:伦敦和卢顿儿童健康(CHILL)方案——一项前瞻性平行队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Nov 4;23(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04384-5.
3
The effect of a School Street intervention on children's active travel, satisfaction with their street, and perception of road safety: a natural experimental evaluation.学校街道干预对儿童主动出行、对街道的满意度以及道路安全认知的影响:一项自然实验评估。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):2207. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23236-8.
4
Parent training interventions for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) in children aged 5 to 18 years.针对5至18岁儿童注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Dec 7;2011(12):CD003018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003018.pub3.
5
Stakeholder perspectives on the effects of environmental and socio-economic factors on children's health and learning: a qualitative study in Greater Manchester, England.利益相关者对环境和社会经济因素对儿童健康与学习影响的看法:英国大曼彻斯特地区的一项定性研究
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 18;13:1550439. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1550439. eCollection 2025.
6
The risks, benefits, and resource implications of different diets in gastrostomy-fed children: The YourTube mixed method study.胃造口喂养儿童不同饮食的风险、益处及资源影响:YouTube混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(25):1-21. doi: 10.3310/RRREF7741.
7
School-based education programmes for the prevention of unintentional injuries in children and young people.针对儿童和青少年预防意外伤害的校本教育项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 27;12(12):CD010246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010246.pub2.
8
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
9
Strategies for enhancing the implementation of school-based policies or practices targeting risk factors for chronic disease.加强针对慢性病风险因素的校本政策或实践实施的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 29;11(11):CD011677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011677.pub2.
10
Primary school-based behavioural interventions for preventing caries.基于小学的预防龋齿行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;2013(5):CD009378. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009378.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Health and economic benefits of energy, urban planning, and food interventions that lower greenhouse gas emissions.降低温室气体排放的能源、城市规划和食品干预措施所带来的健康和经济效益。
Environ Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 1;9(4):e404. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000404. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
London's Ultra Low Emission Zone and active travel to school: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of children, families and teachers.伦敦超低排放区与步行或骑车上学:一项探索儿童、家庭和教师经历的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 3;15(3):e091929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091929.

本文引用的文献

1
Investigating the impact of London's ultra low emission zone on children's health: children's health in London and Luton (CHILL) protocol for a prospective parallel cohort study.调查伦敦超低排放区对儿童健康的影响:伦敦和卢顿儿童健康(CHILL)方案——一项前瞻性平行队列研究。
BMC Pediatr. 2023 Nov 4;23(1):556. doi: 10.1186/s12887-023-04384-5.
2
Health effects of low emission and congestion charging zones: a systematic review.低排放和拥堵收费区对健康的影响:系统评价。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Jul;8(7):e559-e574. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(23)00120-2.
3
Study Protocol. Evaluating the life-course health impact of a city-wide system approach to improve air quality in Bradford, UK: A quasi-experimental study with implementation and process evaluation.
研究方案。评估英国布拉德福德市改善空气质量的全市系统方法对生命历程健康的影响:一项具有实施和过程评估的准实验研究。
Environ Health. 2022 Dec 5;21(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12940-022-00942-z.
4
Shifting towards healthier transport: carrots or sticks? Systematic review and meta-analysis of population-level interventions.转向更健康的交通方式:胡萝卜还是大棒?基于人群干预措施的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Nov;6(11):e858-e869. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00220-0.
5
12-Year Trends in Active School Transport across Four European Countries-Findings from the Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) Study.12 年来四个欧洲国家积极上学交通方式的变化趋势——基于青少年健康行为调查(HBSC)的研究结果
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 22;18(4):2118. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042118.
6
Lifelong exposure to air pollution and greenness in relation to asthma, rhinitis and lung function in adulthood.终生暴露于空气污染与成年期哮喘、鼻炎和肺功能的关系。
Environ Int. 2021 Jan;146:106219. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106219. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
7
Role of Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in the Mental Health of Preschoolers, Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.体力活动和久坐行为对学龄前儿童、儿童和青少年心理健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sports Med. 2019 Sep;49(9):1383-1410. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01099-5.
8
Interventions promoting active transport to school in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.促进儿童主动上学的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:232-241. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.030. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
9
Impact of London's low emission zone on air quality and children's respiratory health: a sequential annual cross-sectional study.伦敦低排放区对空气质量和儿童呼吸健康的影响:一项连续年度的横断面研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jan;4(1):e28-e40. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30202-0. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
10
Systematic review of interventions for promoting active school transport.系统评价促进积极上学交通的干预措施。
Prev Med. 2018 Jun;111:115-134. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2018.02.010. Epub 2018 Feb 26.