ETH Zurich, Department of Health Science and Technology (D-HEST), Consumer Behavior, Switzerland.
ETH Zurich, Department of Health Science and Technology (D-HEST), Consumer Behavior, Switzerland.
Appetite. 2024 Dec 1;203:107658. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107658. Epub 2024 Sep 2.
Plant-based dairy alternatives have many benefits in terms of sustainability, animal welfare, and health, but they can only be successful in the market if consumers perceive them as suitable substitutes for conventional dairy. Consumers' expectations for new products are strongly influenced by the food categories into which they place these products. The present study aims to reveal consumers' categorizations of plant-based dairy products to gain insights into their potential as dairy substitutes. In a free sorting task, 100 participants from the German-speaking part of Switzerland sorted a variety of plant-based and conventional animal-based dairy products into groups, indicating their spontaneous similarity perceptions. Additionally, we assessed the participants' characteristics and attitudes toward plant-based dairy products to test potential differences in categorization strategies among consumer groups. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis showed that consumers' mental representations of plant-based dairy and conventional animal-based dairy were clearly separated across a wide range of product types. This pattern was even observed among consumers who ate less meat, had higher exposure to vegan dietary styles, and had less negative attitudes toward dairy alternatives. The results suggest that taxonomic distinctions based on plant or animal origin dominate consumers' perceptions and are likely to hinder the substitution of dairy with plant-based dairy. Nevertheless, they also imply that plant-based products that manage to emphasize shared goals and functional properties akin to conventional dairy products are more likely to form a common goal-derived category in consumers' minds and thus have better prospects as substitutes.
植物性乳制品替代品在可持续性、动物福利和健康方面具有许多优势,但只有当消费者认为它们是传统乳制品的合适替代品时,它们才能在市场上取得成功。消费者对新产品的期望受到他们将这些产品归入哪些食品类别的强烈影响。本研究旨在揭示消费者对植物性乳制品的分类,以深入了解它们作为乳制品替代品的潜力。在一项自由分类任务中,来自瑞士德语区的 100 名参与者将各种植物性和传统动物性乳制品分类成组,表明他们自发的相似感知。此外,我们评估了参与者对植物性乳制品的特征和态度,以测试消费者群体在分类策略上的潜在差异。多维尺度分析和聚类分析表明,消费者对植物性乳制品和传统动物性乳制品的心理表征在广泛的产品类型中明显分开。即使在那些吃肉较少、接触素食饮食方式较多、对乳制品替代品持较负面态度的消费者中,也观察到了这种模式。研究结果表明,基于植物或动物来源的分类区别主导了消费者的感知,可能阻碍乳制品被植物性乳制品替代。然而,这也意味着那些设法强调与传统乳制品产品相似的共同目标和功能特性的植物性产品更有可能在消费者心目中形成一个共同的基于目标的类别,从而作为替代品具有更好的前景。