Pointke Marcel, Ohlau Marlene, Risius Antje, Pawelzik Elke
Division of Quality of Plant Products, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Goettingen, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Marketing for Food and Agricultural Products, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development, University of Goettingen, 37073 Goettingen, Germany.
Foods. 2022 Aug 5;11(15):2339. doi: 10.3390/foods11152339.
Consumer acceptance and product development of sustainable, healthy, and tasty plant-based alternative products (PBAPs) are closely interlinked. However, information on consumer perceptions of the sensory profile of plant-based meat, cheese, and milk remains scarce. The study aimed to investigate German consumers' (1) sensory evaluation of PBAPs and (2) consumers´ motivations and knowledge underlying the purchase of such products. This was analyzed in relation to different dietary styles of consumers (omnivore, flexitarian, vegetarian, vegan). A sample of 159 adults completed two tasks: first, a sensory test in which participants tasted and rated three different PBAPs in two consecutive sessions, and second, a questionnaire on consumption behavior, motivation, and knowledge. Results show few differences between nutrition styles in sensory evaluation of individual product attributes. However, overall liking was rated significantly higher by vegans than by omnivores. All dietary styles reported animal welfare and environmental aspects as the main motivations for consuming PBAPs. Most participants acknowledged that meat and cheese alternatives are highly processed foods and not a fad but are not automatically healthier or more environmentally friendly than their animal-based counterparts. Future research should focus on emerging product segments such as plant-based cheeses to better understand how consumers evaluate PBAPs.
可持续、健康且美味的植物基替代产品(PBAPs)的消费者接受度与产品开发紧密相连。然而,关于消费者对植物基肉类、奶酪和牛奶感官特征的认知信息仍然匮乏。该研究旨在调查德国消费者(1)对PBAPs的感官评价,以及(2)购买此类产品背后的消费者动机和知识。针对消费者的不同饮食方式(杂食者、弹性素食者、素食者、纯素食者)进行了分析。159名成年人参与了两项任务:首先,进行感官测试,参与者在两个连续的环节中品尝并对三种不同的PBAPs进行评分;其次,填写一份关于消费行为、动机和知识的问卷。结果显示,在个体产品属性的感官评价方面,不同营养方式之间差异不大。然而,纯素食者对整体喜好度的评分显著高于杂食者。所有饮食方式都将动物福利和环境因素列为消费PBAPs的主要动机。大多数参与者承认,肉类和奶酪替代品是高度加工的食品,并非一时的潮流,但并不一定比其动物性同类产品更健康或更环保。未来的研究应聚焦于新兴产品领域,如植物基奶酪,以更好地了解消费者如何评价PBAPs。