Taha Dina M
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Doha Institute for Graduate Studies, Doha, Qatar.
Centre for Refugee Studies, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Br J Sociol. 2025 Jan;76(1):34-49. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.13145. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
Drawing on fieldwork data among Syrian refugee women marrying Egyptian men amid forced migration, I explore how displacement reshapes the meaning and purpose of marriage. Many such unions, often customary or polygamous, provoke comparisons to forced marriage and gender-based violence. Bypassing the reductive exploitation and static narratives, I ask: How does displacement alter refugee women's perceptions of marriage's purpose? And can marriage serve as a strategic tool for (self)resettlement? This investigation urges us to reevaluate the existing range of resettlement options and criteria, offering fresh perspectives on marital strategies post-displacement. Rather, similar marriages often stem from both affective and practical considerations, challenging colonial dichotomies (e.g., agent/victim) and reinstating the role of factors such as social capital in the trajectories of the uprooted. This study expands understanding of gendered and Othered refugee experiences, highlighting marriage's transformative role in forced displacement and resettlement. It contributes to ongoing discussions on marriage, displacement, and resettlement, urging a nuanced approach that acknowledges the complexities of refugee agency and adaptation.
基于对叙利亚难民妇女在被迫迁移过程中与埃及男子结婚的实地调查数据,我探讨了流离失所如何重塑婚姻的意义和目的。许多这样的结合,通常是习俗婚姻或一夫多妻制,引发了人们将其与强迫婚姻和基于性别的暴力进行比较。绕过简化的剥削和静态的叙述,我提出问题:流离失所如何改变难民妇女对婚姻目的的认知?婚姻能否成为(自我)重新安置的战略工具?这项调查促使我们重新评估现有的重新安置选择和标准范围,为流离失所后的婚姻策略提供新的视角。相反,类似的婚姻往往源于情感和实际两方面的考虑,挑战了殖民二分法(如施动者/受害者),并恢复了诸如社会资本等因素在流离失所者轨迹中的作用。本研究扩展了对性别化和他者化难民经历的理解,突出了婚姻在强迫流离失所和重新安置中的变革作用。它为正在进行的关于婚姻、流离失所和重新安置的讨论做出了贡献,敦促采取一种细致入微的方法,承认难民能动性和适应的复杂性。